Does Star Trek even provide a message that anyone cares about in the modern day?
I even see enough on these boards how much people dislike GR's vision of the future in regards to existentialism and egalitarianism. They just like the fun and action. For Star Trek to move forward it has to evolve in to that and lose its core values; which it is doing with the films quite effectively.
Unforetunately, I have to agree with SubCommander-I wouldn't be surprised if there was never again a television Trek.
The largest gap in live action Trek was the decade between TOS and TMP. If there is to be a (likely TOS) television reboot, I wouldn't be surprised if there would be a similar gap between JJTrek and the TV reboot.
Now, will anybody care about Trek but an aging, shrinking fan base? Maybe younger people who enjoyed JJTrek?
I would love to be wrong and hope I am, but right now, that is how I see it.
I even see enough on these boards how much people dislike GR's vision of the future in regards to existentialism and egalitarianism. They just like the fun and action. For Star Trek to move forward it has to evolve in to that and lose its core values; which it is doing with the films quite effectively.
They don't and haven't lost anything. I still see people getting along. But at the same time, you have to actually entertain your audience. If you don't do that, your audience will find something else that does entertain them.
I even see enough on these boards how much people dislike GR's vision of the future in regards to existentialism and egalitarianism. They just like the fun and action. For Star Trek to move forward it has to evolve in to that and lose its core values; which it is doing with the films quite effectively.
They don't and haven't lost anything. I still see people getting along. But at the same time, you have to actually entertain your audience. If you don't do that, your audience will find something else that does entertain them.
As someone who recognizes the existentialist themes in early Star Trek. I respectfully disagree.
We are both entitled to our opinions though.![]()
I would love to be wrong and hope I am, but right now, that is how I see it.
After seven hundred episodes, I think I'm okay if it never comes back to TV. A movie every few years scratched the itch for new Trek sufficiently.
They don't and haven't lost anything. I still see people getting along. But at the same time, you have to actually entertain your audience. If you don't do that, your audience will find something else that does entertain them.
As someone who recognizes the existentialist themes in early Star Trek. I respectfully disagree.
We are both entitled to our opinions though.![]()
Much of this stuff is definitely in the eye of the beholder.![]()
I agree with both BillJ and SubCommander.I would love to be wrong and hope I am, but right now, that is how I see it.
After seven hundred episodes, I think I'm okay if it never comes back to TV. A movie every few years scratched the itch for new Trek sufficiently.
It's down to personal preference I suppose, but if Star Trek did return to TV, I would watch it: Kirk & Spock reboot, or another crew that is interesting wouldn't matter to me. The important thing would be quality.
I think an annual mini-series format, or a short season (no more than 10 episodes) might work best. That would cut down on filler episodes, at least.
Thing is, a big part of the audience is not following forums, buying merchandise and going to cons. They are people who like the show, follow it every week, then watch something else. Most of these people want something relatable.
Often the alien characters are more interesting and diverse than the human ones, I definitely prefer many of them to a lot of the human ones.I don't think there ought to be an issue with not having a human in the centre seat - it's possible to identify with non-human characters in the other shows (Kira, Worf, Kes - even characters like Garak and Nog to a degree) so I don't see why the audience would have a problem with it!
Ferengi first mate. Maybe the Federation Council has seen just a little too much high-minded principle upholding and a little too little acquisition of cool stuff, so an oversight committee hands Starfleet a few "recommendations." Hence, a first mate with some ingrained ideas on what's "good" that the captain WILL hear.
Doesn't have to be crazy talk like ditching the PD (but, in time, that has to come up). Just viewing some missions more as opportunities.
Ferengi first mate. Maybe the Federation Council has seen just a little too much high-minded principle upholding and a little too little acquisition of cool stuff, so an oversight committee hands Starfleet a few "recommendations." Hence, a first mate with some ingrained ideas on what's "good" that the captain WILL hear.
Doesn't have to be crazy talk like ditching the PD (but, in time, that has to come up). Just viewing some missions more as opportunities.
I'd just like to retcon the Ferengi right out of existence.
Also, ditching the PD would be very un Trek.
Spend less on space battles and big explosions so the focus is more on the people, that would help balance the books.The problem I see is one of money. The cost of makeup for the star of the show would put a drain on the budget, since the Captain is pretty much going to be the center of attention and likely in every episode. That brings several hours per day of shooting as extra paid time just to get the actor made up into whatever species they come up with, as most take at least and hour to put the makeup on for a skilled team, and half that to take it off.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.