• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A new golden era of fandom?

Warped9

Admiral
Admiral
Have we entered a golden era of fandom?

A case could be made that the ‘80s or ‘90s were a golden era for Star Trek fandom. Many older fans can look back with nostalgia even to the 1970s when the only new Star Trek available was the animated series and the occasional original novel from Bantam Books, a time which finally culminated in 1979 with the release of TMP. While it was something of a scarce time in terms of new Star Trek it was also a time of dedicated fandom that wrote fan fiction, attended conventions, bought tie-in merchandise and kept watching the same original seventy-nine episodes over and over and over again. And Star Trek also gained new fans as newer viewers came to the show and it grew in popularity far beyond the audience it initially drew in 1966-69.

In the ‘80s we started to get a semi-regular serving of new Trek in the form of a feature film every few years. But it can be said that Trek’s popularity exploded in the late ‘80s with the arrival of TNG. Older viewers tuned in (and some not) and a new generation of fans developed as well. With new Trek on the big screen and a regular serving of Trek on television for the next eighteen years, and the original series still being aired, fans could OD on Trek. The arrival of the internet also allowed fans to connect with each and share their interests instantly with anyone around the world far faster and in greater numbers than could ever have been imagined. Back in the ‘70s Trek related news was shared by telephone, snail mail, at conventions and by magazines. And the news you received could be at best weeks to months old. The internet changed everything so that the latest news could be shared everywhere almost instantly. Along with the internet the introduction of ever advancing home computers also helped fans generate ever more polished fan projects. In the ‘70s fans began drawing familiar and new ship designs by hand. The introduction of drawing and image manipulating software allowed fans create ever more sophisticated designs and drawings. Then the availablility of 3D modelling took the technical aspects of fan made Trek to a level that could rival professional work.

The 21st century introduced a whole other level of fandom expressing itself: fan made features and web series. Essentially fans could now not only write new Star Trek stories, but with the means, evolving resources and falling cost of technology dedicated fans can now produce their own features and episodes. If they don’t like what Hollywood is offering them or if they just want to emulate or expand upon what already exists they can do it. Resources today allow fans to bring their own stories, their fan fiction to life. And the quality of those works, much like any fan projects since Star Trek debuted, varies from mostly enthusiastic to near professional standard in polished production. In turn viewers can even donate and help fund the projects that most interest them.

So has fandom entered a golden age or has that age passed?
 
I think it's a good time to be a fan of Star Trek, whether that is a golden era, I don't know. I wasn't around in the 60s and 70s, or really the 80s. I remember my fandom really in the 90s. It was there (1997-98) that I started using the internet and found out what a fan board was. I got pictures of my favorite characters printed off the internet. I found out about the story arc of the war for DS9. I watched trailers online.

With the advent of the computer, in my jammies, I can network with Star Trek fans in a way I never could before. That continues on this site. Because of the technology, Star Trek is coming to Blu-Ray, and episodes of Next Generation have been on the big screen. We are seeing it like we've never seen it before. It renews interest in it and we have Youtube to see actual convention footage (FOR FREE!). Star Trek collectors around the world have actual set pieces now.

We have a whole new universe to explore now with the movies. The new movies have allowed me to romanticize the Star Trek that came before it. Being older than 10 or 13 or 16, when Star Trek in the 90s was in its heyday, I can look back now and everything is new again. I have a larger world to draw from than I did when I was a teenager.

So, personally, this is my golden era. I enjoy Star Trek, it's not moving so fast I can't keep up, but it's still viable. Time of fatigue is over. I am more mature. And Star Trek is still alive. :)

EDIT: I forgot to mention Netflix and the rise of binges. In the 1990s, you had to pay 15 dollars for an episode. Today, you can get a season for 65 on Amazon, and it can be as low as 35. This encourages people to watch it.
 
Last edited:
It's a great time to be a fan, although without a new series there's not much for that fan to watch. The quality of the novels has increased exponentially. The writing style is far superior than in the past; the average novel now is better than the best novels of the 70s 80s or 90s (including Diane Duane's novels that sold so well).
 
Resources today allow fans to bring their own stories, their fan fiction to life. And the quality of those works, much like any fan projects since Star Trek debuted, varies from mostly enthusiastic to near professional standard in polished production. In turn viewers can even donate and help fund the projects that most interest them.

This is certainly a development I find striking, and in this sense I don't think fandom has yet entered a golden age but that one is possibly in the offing. Something like Cawley's operation would have been unthinkable in the Nineties and what it has produced is astonishing -- and holds out the possibility and even likelihood of low-budget fan-made content that could be really watchable by a larger audience. We're not there yet, but it seems possible now in a way I would never have thought ten years ago.

OTOH there's a question of what "fandom" is really focused around when the franchise in question is producing little new (official) product.
 
In my opinion it's a golden age because TOS novels are coming out regularly, the array of TOS-related fan films has never been greater (and there are some of amazing quality), and there is merchandise on sale now that I have dreamed about owning since I was five years old, like screen accurate TWOK uniforms, TMP toy phasers, you name it.

The Trekbbs allows me to communicate with hundreds of fellow fans whereas in the 80's, I literally thought I was the only Trek fan in Australia, if not the whole world! My Twitter is full of people half my age who have discovered Trek thanks to the eye candy of the new JJ crew. Whether they stick around or not, it's too early to tell, but I am thrilled so many young people are giving Star Trek a look.

Yes, it's a golden era for me as a Trek fan personally, but also I am conscious that we are going to be farewelling some beloved actors over the next few years, so I want to enjoy these good times as much as possible, and accordingly I am determined to get to a US convention this year to celebrate TOS, my favourite show of all time.
 
I can only read about the fandom of the '60s because I was a child and not yet aware of Star Trek. But from what I've read it didn't sound too different from the fandom of the '70s.

I started watching late '69 or early '70 when I was about 11. Throughout the much of the decade I felt mostly alone in my interest with very few friends also into the show. It wasn't until I read David Gerrold's book The World Of Star Trek that I began to learn how widespread Trek's fandom was and how many others were interested in very much that same things that interested me. I also started to read Starlog magazine which also was a reflection of the impact Star Trek was having. Through those sources I began to learn that while some were experiencing a similar solitary experience as me others were experiencing the show with groups of friends and fellow fans. It has to be said that I have a measure of being a loner and I didn't really experience shared fandom until the mid '80s to early '90s.

In the '70s and '80s any little new thing like tie-in merchandise could be akin to gold because it felt rare and special. Today the amount of stuff available is mind boggling. Being able to own the shows and films you like in a convenient form of media and being able to watch whatever you want whenever you want would have been unimaginable in the '70s. The quality of some of today's merchandise is also incredible. In the day you had to make your own uniform. Today you can buy a uniform that looks just as good as what you see onscreen.

The TrekBBS is a venue no one could have envisioned in the '70s. To some extent it renders some of the sources we relied upon in the '70s and '80s redundant. You certainly don't have to feel alone anymore even if you're the only one in your area who is a fan because you have hundreds to thousands to millions of like minded fans just a mouse click away. When I used to attend Toronto Trek conventions I really enjoyed the panel discussions, but with forums like the TrekBBS you can participate in such discussions 24/7 and 365 days of the year.
 
Actually I think its a dark age for trek fans.

TOS-only fans are aging, and I really don't see many fans of TOS under 35.

As for the TNG-ENT era, it seems not only do the TOS-only fans who never accepted that era seem to delight in ripping on TNG, so do the Abramsverse fans. More so for VOY and ENT, and to some lesser extent for DS9. It even seems sometimes former fans of these shows have turned on this era and eat their own. Which is sad, really, because I personally think most of that era was good to great, and really, when taken as a whole, that is a combined 25 seasons of Trek. Maybe it is just the culture here at this site, but I see a LOT of negativity towards this era, and it seems almost fashionable to hate on this era, here.

As to the newer Abrams movies, eh, I don't see a large following. There are a few hardcore fans of the new movies, but I really don't see many NEW trek fans. I think the majority of the fans of Abramsverse trek were existing fans who were on board because it was Trek, and because they felt it revitalized an ailing franchise. Oh, sure, there were a lot of people who saw the new movies that never saw other incarnations of trek, but are they fans? I think not. They were mostly casual movie goers who wanted a popcorn flick, which is what they got. They view the movies as blockbuster movies that they could take a sequel or leave it but not passionate either way, and not much more.
 
tumblr.

Go there. Search Trek topics, characters etc..

Be amazed. Youth loves Star Trek. And it loves it with a lot more humour that past generations have mustered.
 
... the average novel now is better than the best novels of the 70s 80s or 90s (including Diane Duane's novels that sold so well).
Opinions on the better of modern novels in comparison to pre-"relaunch" novels varies, to say the least.

In terms of the top twenty bestselling Star Trek books, aren't all of them from before the turn of the century?

(Glad you like the new ones)

:)
 
I think fandom is more than what series or films are being put out by the studio. I think it is largely what is reflected back by the fans in their engagement to not only collect stuff, but also to discuss, debate (and argue) and express and share their interests and enthusiasm through their own projects.

Star Wars developed a fandom that sustained itself for years based on only three films and some books and tie-in merchandise. All of that based off only about six hours of material onscreen until the next trilogy of films arrived as well as The Clone Wars series.

Star Trek had over a hundred hours of screen time with TOS and then TAS to feed off until the film era began in 1979. Certainly in terms of the sheer amount of material onscreen Star Wars cannot compete with Star Trek even without taking into account the followup films and series.

And as I said in my OP we have reached a point where fans no longer need to wait for Hollywood to give them new filmed stories. Fans can now create their own fully realized episodes. This is a level of expression that simply was unimaginable even little more than a decade ago. Whether one is interested or not it is an indication of dedicated interest and enthusiasm.
 
STAR TREK Fan Films are inferior imitators and it shows. Especially when "real" talent is involved, seeing veteran STAR TREK actors like Tim Russ and Walter Keonig with egg on their face(s) is just embarassing. I know these projects have a surprising amount of support from a certain percentage of the fanbase. I also know that they're not always so comically inept at trying to get such a picture made. But they're bad. The CGI effects look like an XBox game and the stories are often corny. The cinematography is often uninteresting, at best and the make-ups tend to be really bad, bordering on unphotogenic. On the Plus Side, though, they are often made with Love and I really wish a lot of Hollywood would make movies with that kind of investment. But otherwise, the notion that general audiences might actually consider these Fan Films as a viable alternative to CBS produced STAR TREK is Ludacris!
 
^^ I agree to a large extent and the exposure they have online is substantially smaller than what would be seen in television or film. They also have limited promotion beyond word-of-mouth. But there are indications of narrowing the gap. I don't offer up fan films as a widespread replacement for studio made Trek, but as an expression of fan engagement.
 
It's a great time to be a fan, although without a new series there's not much for that fan to watch. The quality of the novels has increased exponentially. The writing style is far superior than in the past; the average novel now is better than the best novels of the 70s 80s or 90s (including Diane Duane's novels that sold so well).


A matter of opinion, only.

ME
 
STAR TREK Fan Films are inferior imitators and it shows. Especially when "real" talent is involved, seeing veteran STAR TREK actors like Tim Russ and Walter Keonig with egg on their face(s) is just embarassing. I know these projects have a surprising amount of support from a certain percentage of the fanbase. I also know that they're not always so comically inept at trying to get such a picture made. But they're bad. The CGI effects look like an XBox game and the stories are often corny. The cinematography is often uninteresting, at best and the make-ups tend to be really bad, bordering on unphotogenic. On the Plus Side, though, they are often made with Love and I really wish a lot of Hollywood would make movies with that kind of investment. But otherwise, the notion that general audiences might actually consider these Fan Films as a viable alternative to CBS produced STAR TREK is Ludacris!

. . . in your opinion.

ME
 
It's often a case of "be careful what you wish for..."

I joined active Trek fandom in 1980, having just seen ST:TMP (about five times) on the big screen and, although Trek had not had a decent rerun on TV in Sydney, Australia, we were so lucky to have monthly marathons of six, later five, TOS episodes on the big screen. The two intermissions gave plenty of time to meet new friends and swap Trek gossip. I had also revisited TAS in full colour on daily breakfast TV, having previously only viewing then in b/w in the 70s.

It was interesting how some older fans - so-called TOS originals - saw TMP fans as newbie interlopers that would threaten The Way Things Were. That fear aspect of social groups is regularly played out with each new Trek incarnation.

The next few years - of collecting every shred of news and rumor about STs II, III and IV - were wonderful. Each new film brought a host of new members, but each change to Trek brought about tantrums from older members, who often stomped off in disgust. (Nothing new under the sun.) We had to create sealed sections in our newsletters - "Spoilers!" - but the announcement of TNG going into production was bittersweet. The new series went to direct rental home video in Australia first, two episodes per month, so we tried to source American penpals to supply off-air tapes for meetings to meet demand and expectation. But showing said tapes at meetings, of course, was blatant copyright infringement (we did get special permission to show some videos!), but our ranks had swelled from ten to twenty people at a monthly meeting to a hundred or so!

Running a club for 200+ members, of which 10% attend meetings, becomes almost a full time career when you have 1000+ members and 10% of those attend monthly meetings. It's also a lot of leftover food if you cater for 100 and only 20 show up for some reason. No longer could we meet in a member's lounge room. Room hire, equipment hire, prepaid tickets... The newsletter went from a monthly eight-page simple thing to a bimonthly 50-pager with photos, artwork and gossip. Three out of every four weekends per month went into newsletter production for a team of volunteers.

It was a golden age for fan activity and creativity in the late 80s and early 90s - costuming, latex-mask workshops, fanzines, filksongs, and fan films on Super 8 and then home video, but Very Hard Work that often went unappreciated by many members who had no idea what was required to keep that non-profit engine running.

And then, in the midst of DS9 and Voyager came the demise of the mighty "Starlog", the rise of interactive virtual bulletin boards that made fan news and zines instantaneous - and seemingly free - and a professionally-licensed local version of the Official Fan Club, which instructed Paramount Australia to send out "Cease and Desist" letters to many old Aussie fan clubs that had been raising funds for charity for decades.

The Internet has been wonderful for celebrating the international nature of fandom. Amusing how often Facebook pages and BBSs forget that fandom goes beyond USA. But you can't beat the immediacy that fans have when news travels, such as my friend live-tweeting "Into Darkness" gossip from her cinema seat at the gala premiere in Sydney.
 
Youth loves Star Trek. And it loves it with a lot more humour that past generations have mustered.
The majority of serious trek fans that I know personally are mid-teens through early thirties, and then there are my parent's trekkie friends who tend more to their own age (mid sixties).

Of those around my own age, I would say I know about thirty people with more than a casual interest in Star Trek. And that just me, one person.

:)
 
And then, in the midst of DS9 and Voyager came the demise of the mighty "Starlog", the rise of interactive virtual bulletin boards that made fan news and zines instantaneous - and seemingly free - and a professionally-licensed local version of the Official Fan Club, which instructed Paramount Australia to send out "Cease and Desist" letters to many old Aussie fan clubs that had been raising funds for charity for decades.

I heard that happened. I really find it hard to believe that the owners of Star Trek demanded fan clubs to be dissolved.
Is that even legal? If I were to start a fan club 3000 km from my nearest official one would the Federal Police arrest me for it?
Seems mighty ridiculous.

Is that Paramount/CBS's current view, do you know?
 
Is that even legal?
CBS does own it, meaning they can control authorized use or shut down any unauthorized use, and they determine what is "unauthorized."

The shutting down of fan clubs make little sense, it a form of free advertizing, and encourages the purchasing of merchandizing.

It's like when they eliminated the marketing of FASA role playing games.

Make you wonder how much longer Star Trek Online is going to be allowed to continue before it is shut down?

:)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top