Let's Revisit the History of the Starfleet Insignia
https://www.startrek.com/news/lets-revisit-the-history-of-the-starfleet-insignia
https://www.startrek.com/news/lets-revisit-the-history-of-the-starfleet-insignia
Hasn't that been conclusively disproven in some unearthed memos from the 60's? The idea each ship had its own symbol was kind of a mistake which carried on through various manuals and ended up giving us a new symbol in "In a Mirror, Darkly" where none was needed.Seems odd that such a current article wouldn't include the Picard-era Starfleet badge, it also omits that for a time in the 23rd century, the arrowhead didn't represent all of Starfleet.
Hasn't that been conclusively disproven in some unearthed memos from the 60's? The idea each ship had its own symbol was kind of a mistake which carried on through various manuals and ended up giving us a new symbol in "In a Mirror, Darkly" where none was needed.
We see Starfleet personnel not of the Enterprise in TOS wearing the arrowhead insignia (Starbase 11, the original Defiant etc) so it makes it all kinda muddy. I think the old Star Fleet Technical Manual explained it by implying the TOS ships with other symbols were working under different branches of Starfleet from the main one (which it called "The Star Fleet Armed Forces", which I guess shows how dated that book is) but to be honest it's such a mess at this point any interpretation can be made with the contradictory evidence at hand.Yeah, but what is onscreen trumps memos.
We see Starfleet personnel not of the Enterprise in TOS wearing the arrowhead insignia (Starbase 11, the original Defiant etc) so it makes it all kinda muddy. I think the old Star Fleet Technical Manual explained it by implying the TOS ships with other symbols were working under different branches of Starfleet from the main one (which it called "The Star Fleet Armed Forces", which I guess shows how dated that book is) but to be honest it's such a mess at this point any interpretation can be made with the contradictory evidence at hand.
Perhaps they went though a phase of unique flag officer emblems, with arrowheads on the lower ranks? Disco has their unique flag officer arrowhead. I dunno.Except none of the flag officers we see wear the arrowhead. They all wear the starburst insignia, except Decker in “The Doomsday Machine”.
Hasn't that been conclusively disproven in some unearthed memos from the 60's? The idea each ship had its own symbol was kind of a mistake which carried on through various manuals and ended up giving us a new symbol in "In a Mirror, Darkly" where none was needed.
My thoughts are that Kirk's era was a transition period from unique insignias to a single insignia. By the time of the movies it was mostly all transitioned.
What the memo said was that the Enterprise badge was supposed to be for all starships. It said the Tracey/Exeter badge was a mistake, and was silent on the Matt Decker badge. But even if those two were incorrect, it's clear that in TOS not all parts of Starfleet wore the same insignia. Unless starbases, outposts, Academy cadets and possibly transports are not part of Starfleet.
I think Enterprise was trying to play on the idea from TMP back there were different insignias for each ship because on Enterprise each ship had it's own shoulder patch. I think they were assuming the different ships-different insignias was there at from the beginning and only changed to the familiar insignia by the time of TWOK, probably in honor of their most famous starship and crew.
Of course Star Trek (2009) and Discovery blew that out of the water.
Actually, now with Discovery, TOS is the outlier and the arrowhead was the fleet wide symbol both before and after.
I'm talking about Star Trek though.
Behind-the-scenes errors notwithstanding, from an in-universe standpoint, the Exeter and Constellation insignia are significant visual variations that can't be written off as errors on Starfleet's part.
Wonky replicator. The new one was to be installed on Tuesday. Sadly both ships were destroyed on a Monday.Yeah I agree. Whether Enterprise, Constellation and Exeter were in different fleets or squadrons or regional or functional commands is anyone's guess. But there must have been some (in-universe) difference between them.
The original Star Trek is definitely the odd man out in this brave new world. I hope someday we get a sequel based off of the original 79 episodes.
The original Star Trek is definitely the odd man out in this brave new world. I hope someday we get a sequel based off of the original 79 episodes.
My thoughts are that Kirk's era was a transition period from unique insignias to a single insignia. By the time of the movies it was mostly all transitioned.
I think Enterprise was trying to play on the idea from TMP back there were different insignias for each ship because on Enterprise each ship had it's own shoulder patch. I think they were assuming the different ships-different insignias was there at from the beginning and only changed to the familiar insignia by the time of TWOK, probably in honor of their most famous starship and crew.
Of course Star Trek (2009) and Discovery blew that out of the water.
Behind-the-scenes errors notwithstanding, from an in-universe standpoint, the Exeter and Constellation insignia are significant visual variations that can't be written off as errors on Starfleet's part. It's reasonable to say that some ships use the arrowhead, and some ships use different symbols, and as you mention, other facilities use yet other symbols. That's what we actually saw on screen in the canon.
ENT even gave the Defiant from TOS its own unique chest insignia in IAMD, even though the dead officers in "The Tholian Web" were wearing the arrowhead insignia (at least the ones that we could see).
Kor
Yeah I agree. Whether Enterprise, Constellation and Exeter were in different fleets or squadrons or regional or functional commands is anyone's guess. But there must have been some (in-universe) difference between them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.