I've been to all of them!
Finally made it to Antarctica this past January. Been to Africa, Australia and Asia once each, South America twice, Europe seven times and I live in North America.
A few fucking idiots don't.
I'm not entirely sure I share your somewhat hostile sentiments. Is Greenland part of North America? How about Cuba? Is Japan truly a part of Asia? How about Africa and Madagascar? It really depends on how you look at it.A few fucking idiots don't.
fixed your post.
Is Greenland part of North America?
How about Cuba?
Yes.Is Japan truly a part of Asia?
Yes.How about Africa and Madagascar?
No. It's basic geography actually.It really depends on how you look at it.
I've been to all of them!
Finally made it to Antarctica this past January. Been to Africa, Australia and Asia once each, South America twice, Europe seven times and I live in North America.
No. It's basic geography actually.
Just remember that Oceania is at war with Eurasia and all will be fine.No. It's basic geography actually.
I'm not sure I agree. This discussion about continents, like the discussion about the "southern ocean" in the other similar thread, isn't a matter of pure science when it comes to common usage. The terms we use, while ostensibly having definitions approved by independent scientific organisations, get used much more widely in a highly geopoliticised manner.
I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing, nor that the only "correct" definition should be the scientific one. After all, for most people and certainly to national governments, the sociopolitical definitions are far more important albeit more malleable/indistinct.
How do you figure? What makes it such an absolute?Is Greenland part of North America?
Not sure.
How about Cuba?
Absolutely
Yes.
Yes.How about Africa and Madagascar?
No. It's basic geography actually.It really depends on how you look at it.
Just remember that Oceania is at war with Eurasia and all will be fine.No. It's basic geography actually.
I'm not sure I agree. This discussion about continents, like the discussion about the "southern ocean" in the other similar thread, isn't a matter of pure science when it comes to common usage. The terms we use, while ostensibly having definitions approved by independent scientific organisations, get used much more widely in a highly geopoliticised manner.
I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing, nor that the only "correct" definition should be the scientific one. After all, for most people and certainly to national governments, the sociopolitical definitions are far more important albeit more malleable/indistinct.
![]()
I've been to all of them!
Finally made it to Antarctica this past January. Been to Africa, Australia and Asia once each, South America twice, Europe seven times and I live in North America.
How long were you there? What did you do while you were there? Is Antarctica weather in January much more tolerable than in June?
Nice one! You are now the Michael Palin of the TrekBBS.
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.