Just because no fault had been known previously to be there doesn't necessarily mean there isn't one. Quakes happen on previously-unknown branches of faults quite commonly; it's often how they're discovered in the first place. Looking at the historical seismicity map, though, it appears that the most active area is to the south and west of OKC (Meers fault?) rather than the southeast.Seeing as I pretty much missed yesterday and only suffered broken dishes due to the shaking that apparently took place in my neighborhood, I'm not qualified to comment. Truthfully, I'm bummed that I missed it.The local geologists are saying they believe the increased natural gas production and drilling in Oklahoma for the past two years played a definitive role in the quake yesterday. They reiterated--no known fault line runs under Norman or near Lake Thunderbird, which was the epicenter. No proof as of yet. The Meers fault is nearer to Jones, which has had the rash of tiny tremors for the past 2 years.
I'm not sure I buy the saltwater-injections explanation, but I'm not overly knowledgeable about that or natural-gas mining. It just seems unlikely that it would be the thing to trigger anything as large as a magnitude 5.1 quake.