Yes, but I was just being facetious.
Obviously, which is why I thought it was worth pointing out that it's not just a joke scenario, it's something that actually does happen.
Yep. Especially since the first two movies were set in Victorian times before the series moved to Universal.
And they were actually the exceptions. It's weird -- in the first half of the 20th century, nearly all Sherlock Holmes screen adaptations were set in the then-present day. After all, the stories were still coming out as late as the 1920s, so they were an ongoing series when the first silent film adaptations were made, and so Hollywood got into the habit of treating them as a present-day series, with only a few exceptions like the 1916 William Gilette silent film and the first two Rathbone-Bruce films (and the radio series that spun off from them). So the modernized setting of the Universal Holmes films was the norm rather than the exception. Yet after 1950, as if a switch had been thrown, suddenly every screen adaptation of Holmes treated him as a period character from the Victorian Era. It wasn't until Sherlock and Elementary that we got a modernized Holmes again, more than 60 years after the last one.
I swear, the world was a happier place before fandom discovered the word "canon."![]()
Although it was Sherlock Holmes fans and critics who invented that usage of the word -- the "Doyle canon" as distinct from the Gilette play and other adaptations and pastiches.