owever, Space: 1999 never made any pretense at realism. Rather, in its first season it was consciously surreal, painting outer space as a profoundly alien and philosophically challenging realm in which our conventional expectations about the universe break down completely and anything is possible. The fact that we didn't understand why and how the Moon's journey happened was the whole point, and it was implied that there was some cosmic force of destiny driving their journey. Another way to solicit the willing suspension of disbelief is to make the mystery and inexplicability part of the thematic point and message of the story rather than simply an oversight.
With all the reconstruction that would have to be done with the premise, a name change wouldn't pose a problem for Space: 1999. Any new version would likely bare little resemblance to the 1970's TV show.
No the biggest problem is likely figuring out how to get the Moon blown out into space without destroying it.
I never picked up the second season, did they lose the weirdness go standard space opera?
I'm right there with you when it comes to the current fetish for faux realism, but even when I was fourteen I cringed at the Moon being flung out of orbit-- apparently at superluminal speed.It's called "suspension of disbelief". At least it used to be. I think it's unfortunate that we've lost that in favor of "realism".
It's been years since I read 3001, but I recall about half the book being just a tour of the the marvels of the 31st century. Then it belatedly kicks off into some plot about the monolith turning against earth, which is resolved in a really half-assed way.
So yeah it was a sequel for the sake of a sequel, with lots of admittedly interesting world building but not enough decent storytelling. I'm not exactly full of anticipation for this.
All these years later my biggest takeaways from it are:
Raptor gardeners
Poole's circumcised penis freaking people out
Killer monoliths
Space elevators
Space elevators actually make a fair bit of sense, don't they?
Space elevators actually make a fair bit of sense, don't they?
It wasn't a big part of the story (sorry Poole). I just remembered it sticking out (there's no way not to sound like you're making puns here) to me as funny when the nurse or doctor gasped at seeing his circumcised dick.
That's quite a detail to remember. I read it recently and I don't even remember it.It wasn't a big part of the story (sorry Poole). I just remembered it sticking out (there's no way not to sound like you're making puns here) to me as funny when the nurse or doctor gasped at seeing his circumcised dick.
It's a lot like the first half of 2001, with the apes. Except the 31st century was actually interesting.It's been years since I read 3001, but I recall about half the book being just a tour of the the marvels of the 31st century. Then it belatedly kicks off into some plot about the monolith turning against earth, which is resolved in a really half-assed way.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.