• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

26 Hour Days...

Farscape One

Admiral
Admiral
DS9 did something many of us only dream of... have more hours in the day.

And it's fun to think they had a 13 O'Clock...

But I do wonder about the logistics of this. You can't divide it equally by 3 or 4, so that might make duty shifts seem longer or shorter than other Starfleet postings.
 
When it comes to work I suspect many of us would prefer shorter days. But on a 4 shift pattern each shift would be 6.5 hours long.
 
I'm wondering just now... could our bodies adapt to a 26 hour day/night cycle? Or is our biology hardwired to 24 hrs?
 
I'm wondering just now... could our bodies adapt to a 26 hour day/night cycle? Or is our biology hardwired to 24 hrs?

I don't believe so. I think as long as a similar ratio of "work v rest" was preserved then they would adapt (probably with some initial tiredness).
 
i always wonder how those extra two hours count in the lives of the human/SF people. Are any events scheduled to take place at 2500, or are those 26 hours divided into 24 equal units? Are shifts 1/13th longer, or does everyone just get 2 extra hours every day to listen to Morn prattle on? How does the Federation organization of time compare to the Bajoran work/rest cycle--do Bajorans think working under the Federation is too restful?
 
i always wonder how those extra two hours count in the lives of the human/SF people. Are any events scheduled to take place at 2500, or are those 26 hours divided into 24 equal units?

No specific info either way, but I would assume the former (so a 3-shift system would give 8.67 hours (8h40m), whereas a 4-shift system would give 6h30m shifts).
 
My interpreation is the Bajoran day is 26 Bajoran hours long. Not earth hours.
 
Yes, a Bajoran day is 26 hours. I just always wondered how humans adapted to that.

Come to think of it, how about other species? Klingons? Ferengi? Vulcans?
 
My interpreation is the Bajoran day is 26 Bajoran hours long. Not earth hours.

Yes, a Bajoran day is 26 hours. I just always wondered how humans adapted to that.

Come to think of it, how about other species? Klingons? Ferengi? Vulcans?
I interpret hours as being a paticularly human unit of time, and day as being a flexibly, but ultimately local, period of time. When Nog tells Vic his program can run 26 hours a day, Nog (through the UT) is saying that humans would measure the Bajoran day in 26 of their hours.
 
Agreed that the hours are likely to be Earth ones. An hour is short enough a unit to be relevant for deadlines: if something is going to happen in "72 hours", our human heroes must know it's more or less exactly 72 Earth hours and not, say, ca. 69 Earth hours which matches 72 local hours (as the only real way to get around the potential for confusion would be to call the Bajoran units of time by some other name, preferably the local one, and we never get that). The same goes double for minutes and triple for seconds.

OTOH, a month may well be a local unit of time more often than not, and a year could easily be that without saying. Nobody's lives would depend on the heroes getting the "wrong" type of year at first, because there would by definition be plenty of time to get it straightened out. Also, years and often also months would be defined by local astronomical phenomena - "once around the star", "the (biggest, brightest, whatever) moon goes around once" - rather than arbitrarily related to Earth units.

By these tokens, it's extremely unlikely that the Bajoran day is exactly 26 hours long, given that it's Bajor and those are Earth hours - but also unlikely that it would significantly differ from 26 Earth hours or else there would be complications that would warrant the occasional bit of dialogue. Also, I guess humans would have the nicest sort of precedent from having operated with the Martian day cycle that differs minimally from Earth's but nevertheless differs!

As for humans adapting, there's plenty of data on slightly longer work/rest cycles being okay with human physiology and psyche, and of daylight/darkness cycles being essentially irrelevant. We also know that 4 hours of rest followed by 4 hours of work is okay, as sailors of yore have lived by such "day cycles" easily enough. What remains to be seen is how long a cycle we could adapt to, given enough adaptation time and the proper chemical aids.

Timo Saloniemi
 
There is also the option of putting shift lengths out of sync with the length of the day so personnel gradually rotate through the day and night cycles, avoiding a difficult switch. That what would happen on Earth if you went to a longer length "day".
 
There is also the option of putting shift lengths out of sync with the length of the day so personnel gradually rotate through the day and night cycles, avoiding a difficult switch. That what would happen on Earth if you went to a longer length "day".
Or get the crew addicted to raktajino. :klingon:
 
I think it'd be easier for humans to adapt to a slightly longer day than a slightly shorter day. Human bodies prefer around a 24 hour day, but it's not exact. If you went to sleep at 11 PM, you won't be awake and alert until 10:59 then suddenly need to go to bed. Just maybe over the long run you'd need a little more sleep per day.

It's an interesting thought experiment how they hadn't different species with different circadian rhythms. How you put people on an 8 hour cycle on the same ship as people with 72 hour cycle. They might just avoid that or they may have some system where different people have different length shifts.

Also I don't know if there's some astrophysics related reason that planets that support life must have a rotational period in a certain range.

I guess if we accept we live in a universe where all the planets in a galaxy full of six billion year old stars all industrialized within the same four thousand year span, we can accept that all those planets also have similar rotational periods.
 
Indeed, most of the Class M planets in the Trek Milky Way might be Class M because they were terraformed by a succession of humanlike species: whenever a species radically different from humans tried to ascend to galactic dominance and disrupt the succession, it had to start at a disadvantage against humanlike species who already had plenty of planets ready for the taking, and who would add to that total with their own terraforming.

I wouldn't sweat synchonicity in Trek, either. We have seen that cultures that industrialize early can "ascend" out of the way of newcomers, so if Earth finds friends and opponents at its own level, this needn't indicate a lack of more mature cultures - at most a disinterest in them. And it's mutual, really.

Timo Saloniemi
 
I'm wondering just now... could our bodies adapt to a 26 hour day/night cycle? Or is our biology hardwired to 24 hrs?

Naps. The siesta is a solar system wide concept in Bajor. Short nap after lunch, another short nap when you get home from work.

Those people that don't nap drink more raktajino.
 
I guess it'd be a bit like living in those places on Earth where the sun doesn't set at certain times of year. Humans have a great capacity for finding ways to adapt even though our biorhythms are geared towards a 'normal' day/night cycle.
 
I'm sure that by the 24th century, human Starfleet crews have become so used to serving on various alien worlds, that adapting to the Bajoran 26-hour day wouldn't be that hard.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top