Nope.Serenity!![]()

Nope.Serenity!![]()
By the way, it means a great deal that so many people have expressed a desire for me to be writing Trek fiction again, especially given that my last Trek novel came out almost a decade ago. Thank you guys.
![]()
By the way, it means a great deal that so many people have expressed a desire for me to be writing Trek fiction again, especially given that my last Trek novel came out almost a decade ago. Thank you guys.
![]()
By the way, it means a great deal that so many people have expressed a desire for me to be writing Trek fiction again, especially given that my last Trek novel came out almost a decade ago. Thank you guys.
![]()
Some of which were quite cool (baby Boyce bouncing on "Jack" Archer's knee, "T'Pol's World") and some were as awkward as possible (trying to reconcile early ENT mind melding with TOS before the show itself finished that arc). Disco hasn't has been subtle as a sledgehammer with references (I half expected Admiral Cornwell to turn to the camera and say "That was the episode 'Broken Bow' everybody) so I guess we'll see.Some writers did that when Enterprise started airing.
Suddenly references to a Captain Archer and a older Enterprise started popping up in the early 2000s.
I wondered if this means the rumoured future Picard tv series is officially off the table now
I've been re-reading a lot of Trek lately, and often what happens is I'll be in the mood for a certain author. So I read Articles Of The Federation and A Singular Destiny back to back a few months ago. It made me realize how much we owe you for a starting this whole new look at the Federation, with focusing on politics and the workings of the Federation government. I still love those two books so much.
By the way, it means a great deal that so many people have expressed a desire for me to be writing Trek fiction again, especially given that my last Trek novel came out almost a decade ago. Thank you guys.
![]()
Thanks for the shout-out, Allyn. (The piece is here, btw.) I hadn't thought about it as applied to Discovery, partially because Discovery hasn't fallen victim to it as much as other serialized, streaming narratives, but you do have a point. I thought Discovery did a better job than most: episodes 5-9 were all reasonably standalone. On the other hand, characters are often in their "lanes": Ash has no real interactions with anyone who's not Michael or Lorca.There was a perceptive piece written by Steve Mollmann on his blog a few months ago about a problem with heavily serialized television, that even with an ensemble that has lots of interesting character stories to tell, the ensemble and their permutations are chained to the needs of the serial, and other ways of exploring the characters, through standalone episodes, fall by the wayside. He was writing about Stranger Things, but I thought that applied to things like Discovery as well. Maybe in season two the producers can strike a balance between serving the metaplot and telling standalone "strange new worlds" stories. Certainly, the novels and comics could do that as well, though, as you say, there really needs to be "space" between episodes for such stories to slot in.
Now that season one is over, I think you could slot a nice standalone novel somewhere between "Choose Your Pain" and "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum." Lorca, Michael, Saru, Tilly, Ash, Stamets, and Hugh all on Discovery, fighting the good fight against the Klingons, but clearly still with the time to do a single, standalone adventure with that in the background.
That's interesting! Have you followed the news about the show, or have you avoided it?But actually in a way for me, who outside the premiere on CBS, has not seen the show yet it's actually working out quite well. Eventually when it comes out on Blu-Ray (I hope sooner rather than later) I'll have a pretty good familiarity with the characters. I have a good feel so far for Burnham, Lorca and Saru at this point (and some of the other characters as well) and the books have been well written. Thus far I haven't felt not seeing the show has impacted my enjoyment of the books.
That's interesting! Have you followed the news about the show, or have you avoided it?
Thanks! Maybe you have and I haven't noticed, but I'd be curious to see your reviews (in the appropriate threads, I guess) for each of the novels in turn from that perspective. Like, who are Michael/Lorca/Georgiou/Saru to you?Production stuff I've sort of kept up on. And I'm familiar with some very general plot points. Like I know Mudd has made an appearance, that they end up in the mirror universe at some point, things like that. But I've avoided most specific plot points. I don't know what Mudd is doing, how they end up in the mirror universe or what happens there.
I avoid spoilers, but something like Christopher's comment above is fine since it's mostly time frames and episode names and very general information.
I was initially back and forth about reading the novels. Should I since I wouldn't see the show right away? Once I read the synopsis I realized I wasn't going to be ruining anything for when I see the show but I wondered if I would like them since they were characters from the show that I wasn't yet watching.
But then I thought of all the novels I already read with a lot of original characters like New Frontier, Titan and even all the original characters on the relaunches that were never featured on screen and realized that would not be a problem.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.