• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

20 producers in Discovery opening credits, seriously?

I remember the name of Frank Siracusa from all the way back to Due South. He's worked on several major "made in Canada for Canadian audiences" projects over the decades, several with Paul Gross also of the aforementioned Due South. This isn't his first ride in "cult favourite series" territory.

Is he indeed also working on The Handmaid's Tale?

If so, he's bouncing between extremes in terms of science fiction tone here.
 
Eh. As long as the show gets better as it goes on they can have 30 producers every week and one of them can be Cosmo Kramer. Just crank out watchable and entertaining episodes and you can slap any name in the opening credits you want.
 
I was intrigued to see Jesse Alexander listed as a producer. I dimly remember getting some notes from him back when I was working on the ALIAS novels.
 
Funny, Gabriel Charles Koerner (ENT, BSG, ORV) gave a review of Discovery on fb and he mentioned the producers:

Its single biggest problem right now is that it plays like a show that has more Executive Producers than cast members. Probably because it IS a show that has more Executive Producers than cast members.

Like they had an army of dozens of producers that all had to be listened to about their notions of "what they want this show to be" and it feels like a lot of different pieces of a lot of different shows without being one creative showrunner's vision of one show.

I could see a lot of Bryan's ideas in the pilot. But Akiva "Batman & Robin" Goldsman's rewrites ("Trek delta in the sand! They're gonna CHEER at that I tell ya!") and David Semel's limp flaccid direction (the Binary Stars battle had all the excitement of The Edge's guitar playing for U2 - yknow, the kind of Rock that sounds like its trying not to take up a baby) kind of buried them.

And the dramatic impetus for WHY the show was set in "The Cage" era was totally lost when Bryan was shoved out.

So we have a show that's set just-pre-TOS for no reason. And they coulda saved a LOT of grief by taking literally the same show, same designs, same sets, same uniforms, same premise, same actors, same characters and set it post-Nemesis and had to change NOTHING. Sarek becomes some new Vulcan mentor, that's about it.

All the TOS-ish time period does now is just let them dust off old names to drop because according to Marketing, people know "Mr. Spock" but they don't know "Kira, Bashir, Neelix, Reed, Tucker etc... which is kinda true I guess.

Or they could have said its an alternate reality version of a variation of the prime timeline.

But they chose to Half Commit.

https://www.facebook.com/gabekoerner/posts/10215458028350804
 
Those Klingon ships are serious dog shit design work. Like I said before its like someone hit the clone brush tool while in the middle of having a massive stroke.

Those Klingon ship designs are so bad, I kept wondering, "Does the Binary Stars Battle look like it was shot through murky toilet water because they're underlighting those ships to minimize how bad the designs are, or is it that the designs are so bad they don't take light well and therefore have no identifiable silhouettes?" and I decided it was both.

Yep.
 
Yeah, there is simply no excuse for most of these Klingon ship designs, at least none that don't involve a vapid producer or CBS suit saying something along the lines of "the kids and young viewers will think these look so cool!"
 
It has a million producers because it's a big budget production. I just hope it doesn't turn out to be all sizzle and no steak.
 
.. the fact that the producers are multiplying like tribbles, who thought it was a good idea to put them in the opening.
That funny. There's probably a producer of the 'fuck' word, one for the prominent display of black T-shirts with 'Disco' on it. There'll be one for the freshness of Lorca's fortune cookies. One to alternately make sure Tilly and Michael have either primped or crimped hair. Much is happening.
 
It is a "troubled production" as soon as they miss their deadline by almost a year. That stuff has monetary costs, and believe me, no one is happy about that.

Would the quality of the show actually have been better if it weren't a troubled production? Nobody knows. It's equally possible that all the added time payed off big-time, and the finished product we see now is actually a lot better than the original Fuller draft. We really don't know. And besides that, "troubled production" really don't means "bad". TNG had a famously troubled production during it's first two(!) years! I think TNG turned out quite well, and I like even the first two seasons a lot.
If you think ST: D was ever a 'troubled production' then you really don't know how the Entertainment business works. dates slip ALL THE TIME and the only reason it made news here was it was related to a 50+ year popular franchise with rabid fans who get overwrought over minor details (myself included occasionally BTW. ;))

Bur ST: D was never a 'troubled' or 'about to be cancelled before in began' production. IF the Studio REALLY wanted/needed it 'ready to air' by a certain date - it would have aired on that date. That the studio listened to the Production team and gave them more time to produce the show should be an indication of how well they thought of the work going into the show.
 
If you think ST: D was ever a 'troubled production' then you really don't know how the Entertainment business works. dates slip ALL THE TIME and the only reason it made news here was it was related to a 50+ year popular franchise with rabid fans who get overwrought over minor details (myself included occasionally BTW. ;))

Bur ST: D was never a 'troubled' or 'about to be cancelled before in began' production. IF the Studio REALLY wanted/needed it 'ready to air' by a certain date - it would have aired on that date. That the studio listened to the Production team and gave them more time to produce the show should be an indication of how well they thought of the work going into the show.

DIS was HELL of a troubled production. Missing your deadline, firing your producer midway, all are things that shouldn't happen, and cost a lot of money, and create lot's and lot's of headaches for the people behind the scenes. More than just delivering a "bad" product.

"about to be cancelled before in began' production" is a stupid lie you just repeated here, and has NOTHING to do with a "troubled" production. "Troubled" only means having serious problems and costing a whole lot more money than planned. What you are talking about - something that never even materializes - is a financial disaster. Something that is very, very rare (think Terry Gilliams "Don Quixote").

DIS was never under risk of "not being finished". But it sure as hell was under risk of adding even further delays after delays and costing a whole lot of money in-between, without being able to guarantee a certain level of quality for their final product (they achieved that in my mind. But that part wasn't sure).
 
It does not. In fact, that policy ended back when Enterprise was in production.

Sadly. I thought that was a great way to accumulate new and fresh thoughts and plot ideas - even if they neede to be heavily reworked by the core writers - and introduce new writers to the writing scene. MANY of the familiar Trek writers started out by submitting their own little drafts to the TNG writers back then.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top