Sidenote: Shatner and Dickinson co-starred in another TV Movie, The Love War IIRC about two alien species disguised as humans fighting each other for control of the Earth.
I saw both, but going to the movies were a weekly thing back then. Might have even seen both in the same week. The only time we did a "double feature" was with the Jerk and 1941 on Dec. 14th, 1979.For your consideration: a 1982 faceoff: John Carpenter's THE THING or Ridley Scott's BLADE RUNNER.
They also came out on the very same (Fri)day in June 1982, sci-fi's ultimate film year. Myself, I saw BLADE RUNNER once it dropped into my local multiplex, but I wouldn't get to THE THING until it came to video half-a-year later. BLADE RUNNER achieved classic status first, probably by the time of its 1992 re-release. Despite its budgetary limitations at its end, I now prefer THE THING.....which definitely is wicked fun in a way BLADE RUNNER couldn't and never wanted to be.
But what if you could only see one? In 1982, I went with BLADE. Now, I have to vote differently.
These would both have been TV movies, though, airing on the same night at the same time, on competing networks.I saw both, but going to the movies were a weekly thing back then. Might have even seen both in the same week.
For your consideration: a 1982 faceoff: John Carpenter's THE THING or Ridley Scott's BLADE RUNNER.
They also came out on the very same (Fri)day in June 1982, sci-fi's ultimate film year. Myself, I saw BLADE RUNNER once it dropped into my local multiplex, but I wouldn't get to THE THING until it came to video half-a-year later. BLADE RUNNER achieved classic status first, probably by the time of its 1992 re-release. Despite its budgetary limitations at its end, I now prefer THE THING.....which definitely is wicked fun in a way BLADE RUNNER couldn't and never wanted to be.
But what if you could only see one? In 1982, I went with BLADE. Now, I have to vote differently.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.