Search results for query: * (refine your search)

Which, aside from the collapse of the strength of streaming everywhere, presented zero production issues since Star Trek entered this new age. Which you have yet to acknowledge.

Well that's not in debate. It's all about the funding. All streamers are facing the problem. But it's certainly not about the potential "story confusion".

Okay. Then at least just answer why do you continue to ignore the modern streaming shows of overlapping production of Picard, Discovery, SNW and Lower Decks which throws your views completely out the window of "no point of having ship based shows with different crews"? Why a new precedent is...

Then why are they your baseline demographic for your "Can't be overlapping starship shows, they'll be confused!!"? Besides, before you insult me again, read what I said. I said "story", which isn't about the superficial visual element. One needs to watch and take it in to get the "story", and...

Judging just by the surface elements isn't a problem with the art, but the viewer. If you're dumb enough to believe Farscape, The Expanse, Andromeda, Babylon 5 and Voyager are the same story, then go back to kindergarten and start your education over.

A fan on a Star Trek online bulletin board claims to think like a network executive? I don't think you understand the contradiction in what you just wrote as you continue to evade any questions with any truth or facts at all.

Source, please. Picard took place on what was to become TWO Enterprises and was not even close to any story told on the Enterprise of SNW. Facts are more helpful in these discussions.

You're right. All TV shows on every network should cease now since they can all be swapped superficially to be told on SNW. Why did they even do Discovery, Picard, or Academy, when they're all just telling SNW stories with different sets and characters. What a waste of their time, the fools.

Any story with a personal connection for one. Something dealing with the past of an ex Borg, for example, can't be told by using Spock. Or something dealing with humanitarian aid to the Romulans as they continue to rebuild their society. Or anything that a professional creative can come up with...

How do you know they' would definitely be telling the same stories?

If one thinks there's no way to differentiate two shows set on a ship with different crews, they need to experience more stories out there. There's literally infinite options to go with. And there doesn't even have to be a mystery box option!

Easily. Most at the Daily Planet staff (Superman) or Bugle (Spider-Man) aren't part of the superhero life but are interesting on their own.

Just watched the movie. Glad I watched it but also won't ever watch it again. It was weird that Ortego didn't get to really resolve her own story and arc with the ghost boy just as Beetlejuice didn't get to resolve his with Belucci. And as amazing as Keaton was, half of his time felt wasted to...

No such thing as a negative cliche if it's done well and right. Which is subjective. Spider-Man keeping his secret from MJ is heartbreaking to me. Yet had Clark essentially murder his father to keep the almighty secret... (but let's not rehash this here) The cliche isn't the bad part to me...

He gets superpowers, puts on a mask and fights bad guys with superpowers. Cliche is in the concept, why draw a line there when that doesn't even last very long anyways?

Yahya Abdul-Mateen II AND Ben Kingsley's Trevor in Wonder Man? I missed that news. This is all of a sudden the most anticipated one for me.

Doesn't get on my nerves at all. Something in the show eluded you and I was just trying to help you be less confused.

Knowing that, their reasons for amusement shouldn't elude you then.

They have a sense of humour.

Is reusing any familiar character no matter the context automatically "nostalgia"?