• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Search results for query: * (refine your search)

  • Users: DSG2k
  • Order by date
  1. DSG2k

    What's the most powerful weapon in Star Trek? (that we've seen on screen)

    If controllable, the Lazarus entry vector in "The Alternative Factor" produced stress, shock, dilithium issues, and "winking out", with galaxy-wide effect. Magnetic and gravity fields went to zero.
  2. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    Obviously I was referring to the first picture where text was overlaid on top of the existing source text, which is blurred. Anyway, I experimented further with another shot of it over Maddox's shoulder toward the end, just as a clean slate. I also wasn't entirely satisfied with the...
  3. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    I would not try putting the text right on top of the existing blur as it just overwrites. I have no idea . . . the first digit doesn't hit me as a 5 at all. I think the distinction is that I am looking at where the left hand gap is. It is lower on a five. That said, I'm negotiable on the...
  4. DSG2k

    Starship Platform Lifespans

    Anything to prevent there being a bunch of Niagaras flying around.
  5. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    Yeah, I wasn't feeling Laser or Amber. Emden is a good idea since he's used it elsewhere, and I'd wager it will be the best fit. Compacta was very early TNG and Helvetica UltraCompressed later TNG . . . this may indeed be Compacta, because a quick comparison of online samples shows it to be...
  6. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    1. Here's one of your things. https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Forum:Ships_from_%22Conspiracy%22_and_the_%22Starship_Deploy_Status%22_okudagrams. Also: https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/starship-deploy-status-review.314656/ See also...
  7. DSG2k

    Starship Platform Lifespans

    That's pretty much the take I once had, also, in Starships and Continuity of Style: http://weblog.st-v-sw.net/2022/07/starships-and-continuity-of-style.html "In other words, starship design experienced some sudden and as yet unexplained changes in the late 2350s or early 2360s, just as the...
  8. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    I'd seen that, too. That was @Yaroze86, I believe, but looking at a high-res cap I didn't concur with that when last I checked.
  9. DSG2k

    Starship Platform Lifespans

    I'm largely in perfect agreement. And, of course, it's also true that if you field an Excelsior replacement, you're more likely to send that replacement over an Excelsior for hazardous work. The ship might not be destroyed, but, over time, the stresses and strains might produce a retirement...
  10. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    Exceptions exist, but, at least during earlier productions, we could typically identify them and could at least infer why they existed. In this case, it seems 30405 was either forgotten or intentionally overwritten, but this produced an unnecessary contradiction . . . two of them, in fact, due...
  11. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    Seriously? Do you even know where you are posting right now?
  12. DSG2k

    Lexington 71XX1

    The TNG-era starship(s) USS Lexington are referenced a handful of times. 1. mid-2365: "The Measure of a Man" TNG2 SB173-SDS chart, registry NCC-30405 2. mid-2370: verbal reference to rendezvous with Enterprise 1701-D in "Thine Own Self"[TNG7] 3. late-2371: docked at DS9 ("Explorers"[DSN3])...
  13. DSG2k

    Faster than Warp Drive Discussion thread.

    I like the thought that 2280s UFP transwarp was just an improvement to warp drive that became standardized, much like the previous 'breaking of the time barrier' that likely occurred circa 2240 and resulted in ships using the term "time warp" through at least 2254.
  14. DSG2k

    Fun with ship stats

    Having encountered more than my fair share of absurd numbers just in the Trek vs. Wars realm, that video was . . . disappointing. The decibel thing is a minor example, but, as noted above, he barely touches on all that's weird about it. The little issue of sound in space means that, unless...
  15. DSG2k

    How do you detect life signs in space?

    That's what I'm saying. The scanning beams must not fiddle with spins and fields or else we'd expect to hear of more effects from simple scans, or maybe traces of something having been scanned. Off the top of my head, I can only think of an example or two, but I can't quite place them...
  16. DSG2k

    How do you detect life signs in space?

    I like the thought, but, really, I don't think it would be a good idea for UFP ships to be sending out scanning beams that actively fiddle with atomic spins and magnetic fields. Given the sorts of anomalies they tend to regularly encounter, that sort of mucking about with things on a simple...
  17. DSG2k

    How do you detect life signs in space?

    Yeah, I didn't bring up UWB and such, mostly because one would hope the hull blocks most of that. Then again, we saw Voyager's hull fail to block AM radio (ugh). As for looking through windows, there is some wacky tech that can reconstruct imagery from around corners and such by processing...
  18. DSG2k

    How do you detect life signs in space?

    It's often a bit silly, especially on some occasions like the computer failing to recognize Borg drone lifesigns on the suggested grounds that they read as part of the ship or somesuch. That said, your ideas of thermal and electrical signals imply a passive sensor receiving them, and indeed...
  19. DSG2k

    How do you calculate mass / tonnage from the ship's volume?

    Well, you can see more of my old thinking here: https://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWvolumetrics.html Something closer to the Constitution density would seem applicable, given the apparent vintage. That's 4000kg/m³ instead of an Intrepid's 1200, or about 200,000 tonnes. That said, there's lots of...
  20. DSG2k

    How do you calculate mass / tonnage from the ship's volume?

    Well hello there . . . welcome to my wheelhouse. In the case of Star Trek starships, we have two canonical datapoints (at least pre-2009/2017). The first was Scotty's reference in "Mudd's Women" to the Enterprise being nearly a million gross tons. The second is Voyager's mass, stated twice...
Back
Top