I can see the purpose of it, but I still don't like it.It's meant to shuttle around the UFP President between planets.
Think of it as the equivalent of the US' Air Force 1.
I can see the purpose of it, but I still don't like it.It's meant to shuttle around the UFP President between planets.
Think of it as the equivalent of the US' Air Force 1.
Fair Enough.I can see the purpose of it, but I still don't like it.
"Probert-shape"? Funny you say that, since I have used the term "Eaveshape" for his constant use of swept, chopped half-ovals with harsh linear breaks ... the _Sarajevo_ was literally a whole ship composed of them, as if in self-parody. Also, I don't see anything typically Probert except for the clean lines and pleasant bow so loathed by other Trek designers.
Apologies for replying to myself, but to add onto this, I think a major reason why certain designers fit into certain eras better is because they pretty much defined the look for that era.Probert definitely has a recognizable style. Just like Eaves, Sternbach, Jefferies, or most other well-known concept artists and designers. That's neither good nor bad, but some people's designs do seem to fit better in some places/eras than others.
Apologies for replying to myself, but to add onto this, I think a major reason why certain designers fit into certain eras better is because they pretty much defined the look for that era.
It's okay, you can say Eaves. Hot swapping nacelles to vaguely fit the time period but otherwise identical design language... sure, they've all done it at least a tiny bit, but Eaves is Eaves is Eaves.Well, that was fine up until the end of Voyager. Then when a prequel series taking place 200 years before VOY looked and felt just like VOY, that's when the 'look defines the era' thing started to get skewed.
Also, some designers seem the have the same design style no matter what the era is. This also does not help things.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.