Agree about SMG’s hair. Looked great. Not that it didn’t before.
I was glad for the skip year. Burnham has been characterized so inconsistently that I’m happy to see her land at what hopefully is a new normal. Let’s just accept it and move on.
Saru: What's wrong, Michael? Where are the Klingons?I think the year gap is going to matter. She's had a year basically on her own doing her thing by her rules with Book. To then come back into a sttarfleet/military type setup and trusting others is going to be hard. It is also pretty clear she did some things during that year that are going to come by to bite her.
So where's the scene where the Discovery crew raid Earth's computers to find out what they missed? Would the fate of Pike and Spock be on Earth's computers or did the Federation remnant take that with them when they left?
What calculator is this? Also the year should be 3189?I've just put this in a calculator:
Stardate 865211.3 is March 18, 3188, 08:03 AM, to be exact. It's entirely plausible that Burnham defaulted to the TNG system if the part of the galaxy she had arrived in kept using it.
It was the first result that came up when searching for Stardate Calculator. I don't think there should be much difference between different implementations, as it really just takes 1 year = 1000 stardate with the 41000 range corresponding to 2364, TNG Season 1.What calculator is this?
Would quantum dating even work? A scanner would show the Discovery is only a few years old. An accurate quantum scan would only work if time travel wasn't involved.Captain Ndoye abandons quantum dating to place Discovery from the "23rd to 25th" century time frame! What a great way to reconcile the Discovery aesthetic with TOS!![]()
That would be carbon dating. Quantum works as the plot requires.Would quantum dating even work? A scanner would show the Discovery is only a few years old. An accurate quantum scan would only work if time travel wasn't involved.
OK............Dilithium is not a power source. It is used to regulate the matter anti-matter reaction in a warp core. I don't think subspace communication relays use warp cores, do they? So I am not sure why they would need dilithium. They can get power without dilithium.
The one thing I didn't like about DSC (besides the Klingons not having hair in the first season) was the stardates. Even TOS stardates weren't as random as DSC's were in the first two seasons. I'm glad now that they're in The Future, they're going with the TNG system and that the stardates make sense again. It's better than the TOS system or the Kelvin system (which didn't even try to hide how Western-culture and Earth-centric it was).I've just put this in a calculator:
Stardate 865211.3 is March 18, 3188, 08:03 AM, to be exact. It's entirely plausible that Burnham defaulted to the TNG system if the part of the galaxy she had arrived in kept using it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.