Seriously, what's "Gene's Vision"?

Discussion in 'General Trek Discussion' started by CRM-114, Oct 19, 2017.

  1. CRM-114

    CRM-114 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Location:
    North Hills, CA
    Trekkies like to throw around "Gene's Vision" as through it were some immutable truth of the universe, when I'm not even sure if we can collectively agree on a meaning.

    Is Gene's Vision what constitutes the themes of Star Trek, those of peace, tolerance and seeking to better oneself? Is it the idea that humankind can overcome its' troubles to forge a better tomorrow? Is it both of those things, or is it neither? Depending on who you ask, Gene's Vision seems to include the actual Trek aesthetic, the "look" of Star trek, a look it should be noted has evolved over time.

    Speaking of evolving which version of Gene's Vision is "the" vision, what we see in TOS, or is it what we see in TNG? Is it the growing but still learning people of the 23rd century, or the often self-righteous holier-than-thou people of the 24th?

    Considering that Roddenberry died in 1991, thus ending his creative involvement with the franchise, and also considering that Star Trek has the fingerprints of a lot of creative people on it, why should Gene's Vision be treated as though it were sacrosanct?

    Or has it simply become a vague platitude that people throw around to justify their arguments about Star Trek, regardless of their position?

    I'm not saying that Star Trek's themes (peace, tolerance, and growth) don't matter, it's that we should consider the idea that there's more to Star Trek than one man's idea for a better future.
     
  2. Kemaiku

    Kemaiku Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    Yes.
     
  3. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in it's final stage
    "You wanna know what my vision is? Dollar signs. Money!" - Zefram Cochrane, something of a Gene Roddenberry expy, Star Trek: First Contact.
     
  4. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    I think at its simplest, it's just that we'll still be around in the future, and that future will be better than our present. IMO, everything else is kind of derived from that (for better or worse).
     
    KirkusOveractus likes this.
  5. KirkusOveractus

    KirkusOveractus Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Location:
    Ambler, PA
    Roddenberry originally had the idea of a fictional universe where people could be told stories about themselves and learn that humans will live on beyond the time they're watching the series.

    This was put through the prism of an adventure-based platform.

    Years later, as the 70's progressed and people began to latch onto Roddenberry, giving him these high and lofty platitudes of how his creation was a utopian ideal, he began to believe those people, and he started to institute this "Vision" of the future, where it was this peaceful future where humanity had evolved beyond faults and wanted to explore in space, sometimes showing others how incredible things could be if others followed how humans have evolved.

    The "Vision" evolved from people around Gene, repeatedly told to him until he believed it.
     
    Shaka Zulu, Qonundrum, Armus and 5 others like this.
  6. CRM-114

    CRM-114 Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Location:
    North Hills, CA
    That’s what I’m getting at when ask, “Which version?” Gene’s Ideas of what Star Trek was, or could be, markedly shifted over time such that we find ourselves having to ask the question, “Which one is the right one?” Roddenberry himself would probably say TNG, since it is so different thematically from what we see in TOS.
     
  7. Noname Given

    Noname Given Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Noname Given
    Gene's Vision™ = Marleting ploy perpetrated by GR to make Star trek fans feel they were something special, and that the show itself was something more socially relevant that other genre shows of the time (it wasn't as both the Twilight Zone and the first Outer Limits also dealt with socially relevant topics couching them in science fiction and fantasy elements - and they did 'morality plays too) - all in an attempt to keep interest alive so GR could continue to market Star Trek memorabilia (after already having sold the IP lock stock and barrel to Paramount studios in 1969) via his Lincoln Enterprises company; and may be get the show revived so he could get another paycheck.

    Also see: Great Bird of the Galaxy
    ;)
     
  8. Kor

    Kor Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Location:
    My mansion on Qo'noS
    Gene's innovative vision is a future Earth where humans are possessed of highly developed mental abilities and participate in group consciousness, Starfleet officers have computer chips implanted in their heads, marriage is by definition a temporary contract, casual nudity is an everyday thing amongst the general civilian populace, and there's a professional occupation called "love instructor."

    Kor
     
  9. Balok's Decoy

    Balok's Decoy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2016
    Location:
    Balok's Decoy in Baltimore, MD
    It depends on who you ask. It's kind of a meaningless term at this point. And in any case I find it more useful/interesting to talk about the "Star Trek Vision" rather than the "Roddenberry Vision" because it wasn't just Roddenberry who crafted Star Trek's vision. It was also Gene Coon's Vision, Dorothy Fontana's Vision, Berman/Braga's Vision (sorry), Nimoy's Vision (insert any other actor), etc and so forth.
     
    Qonundrum and CRM-114 like this.
  10. The Wormhole

    The Wormhole Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Location:
    The Wormhole
    Gene's Vision is Star Trek's greatest handicap, since strict adherence to The Vision basically means interesting story ideas aren't allowed.

    But really, the franchise existed just fine for twenty years before Gene's Vision became immutable law, and indeed Gene's Vision is just Roddenberry's way of maintaining control over the franchise, in reaction to Paramount removing him from the movies after TMP.
     
  11. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    Money, hookers and blow.
     
  12. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    The irony is that Rick Berman was probably more of a champion of that than Roddenberry was--certainly longer than Roddenberry did in any event. Roddenberry may have started off in firm creative control of things in 1987, but by 1990 he really wasn't controlling anything anymore except in name.
     
    BillJ likes this.
  13. The Wormhole

    The Wormhole Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Location:
    The Wormhole
    While I don't really want to turn this into Berman dissing, he really was someone who lacked vision or ambition with the franchise, insisting on keeping things "safe" and in line with the so-called "Gene's Vision" which truth be told I doubt he ever understood. Though, truth be told, I doubt anyone truly understood the mad ramblings of a mentally ill alcoholic druggy on a downward spiral to the grave.

    Anyway, Berman enforced the idea that Gene's Vision was immutable law to the point that they more or less ran out of ideas by TNG's fourth or fifth season and from there on the franchise got mired in a rut of repetition in which the same kinds of stories or even the same stories were being told and retold ad nauseum. Not to mention things Roddenberry said were held to while simultaneously being ignored. Starfleet isn't a military, even though they act exactly like one. There's no money in the future, even though characters have accounts to charge purchases to, and so on.

    Yeah, Gene's Vision is a mess which has caused the Trek franchise a lot more problems than it should have been allowed to.
     
    Shaka Zulu, Noname Given and BillJ like this.
  14. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    I'm no Berman-booster, but I find what he produced is far more entertaining than anything that has come out of Discovery, yet.
     
    Rahul likes this.
  15. The Wormhole

    The Wormhole Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Location:
    The Wormhole
    To be fair, that's not saying much. But yes, I agree. Voyager sure had a more engaging cast that Discovery does, that's for sure.
     
    Timewalker and BillJ like this.
  16. Push The Button

    Push The Button Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Location:
    Putnam, Connecticut USA
    Do we really have to do this?

    Gene created something that we all love, and I will forever be grateful. He could have chosen to make a western or a cop show instead.
     
  17. Bry_Sinclair

    Bry_Sinclair Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    Gene's vision: lots of lovely young ladies in miniskirts and go-go boots in soft focus.
     
  18. SPCTRE

    SPCTRE Badass Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Location:
    SPCTRE
    *zzzzzip*
     
    KennyB likes this.
  19. KennyB

    KennyB I have spoken............ Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2001
    Location:
    Tokyo Japan
    Boats and hos.............
     
    1001001 likes this.
  20. Trek Survivor

    Trek Survivor Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    Agreed. This is hardly new. The demonisation/tearing down of Roddenberry has been going on since his death. At this point, those that tear apart Roddenberry and mock his 'vision' etc are far greater than those with any blind adherence to it.

    He was a man. A heavily flawed man with plenty of personal demons and - too often - a casual disregard for others. However, he had a terrific imagination and created something truly wonderful (obviously not alone, nobody is claiming that).

    He DID have a vision - that mankind could improve upon itself; that things could and would 'get better'; that the 'human adventure' was just beginning, and would continue to thrive. Both TOS and TNG clearly demonstrate this.

    Yes, he also liked his women, and money and all the other things people continually bring up - I don't recall Gene ever saying he was perfect, or lived the ideals he saw for humanity's future.

    People seem to criticise the fact that it was a changing vision - but why shouldn't Gene's vision and view of things evolve and change over time? I have definitely changed my views on many things in twenty years.
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2017
    Rahul, suarezguy, Longinus and 2 others like this.