• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Jurassic World

And I think Dodgson suffers Peter Ludlow's fate, but with multiple baby Rexes instead of one infant.
Actually Peter Ludlow dies Hammond's death in the first book. Of course, book Hammond was the exact opposite of the Richard Attenborough character, so the death was rather appropriate.
 
Has JW been confirmed a direct sequel to the other films 'cause, what I am reading here sounds like a reboot. Did I miss something?

How could they, after everything that's happened, even consider rebuilding the park? The first time around "spared no expense" and yet failed miserably before the damn thing even opened. Are they nuts, or could that be the point... that TPTB never learn a lesson?

Starting from scratch, revisiting the original premise, only makes sense [to me] in context of it being a reboot... something like, in this universe the park holds together as intended past the events of the original story. A reputation of control and safety is well established. Things don't get out of hand until the worst possible time... Perhaps at the height of a 4th of July weekend, (wink wink) the park is running at full capacity, every hotel room filled with happy guests (i.e. tasty snacks) when the dinosaur crap hits the fan.

It has been confirmed that this film is going to take place 22 years after the incident at Jurassic Park. I have no idea why they would still attempt to build a new park after the failed attempts in the past, but who knows. Hopefully that will be well-explained. On the other hand, the director said during a podcast that he's hoping to open this movie to newcomers and try and capture the spirit of the original film.


http://jurassiccast.podbean.com/page/2/


The why has been explained several times over already:
greed. They know it failed, they know it's dangerous, but they also know that dinos equels cash!! And since people like this ALWAYS consider themselves smarter then those that went before them, they feel they have learned from the mistakes of their predecessors, and will make sure everything goes right.
Funny thing is, it does. The park is working like a charm. But then, revenues start to drop, less income. People have a 'been there, done that' attitude towards, which we would. People get bored with the newest things, even this. So, someone in managment (because they always know best in stories like this) decides to get creative with dino-dna, and makes new attractions.
THen things start going wrong.

That's basicly the concept of this movie.
 
And I think Dodgson suffers Peter Ludlow's fate, but with multiple baby Rexes instead of one infant.
Actually Peter Ludlow dies Hammond's death in the first book. Of course, book Hammond was the exact opposite of the Richard Attenborough character, so the death was rather appropriate.

In the movie The Lost World, Peter Ludlow dies by baby Rex. In the original novel Jurassic Park, Hammond dies by Compy's.
 
And I think Dodgson suffers Peter Ludlow's fate, but with multiple baby Rexes instead of one infant.
Actually Peter Ludlow dies Hammond's death in the first book. Of course, book Hammond was the exact opposite of the Richard Attenborough character, so the death was rather appropriate.

In the movie The Lost World, Peter Ludlow dies by baby Rex. In the original novel Jurassic Park, Hammond dies by Compy's.

One of the characters in the movie did die Hammond's death, though. Been forever since I watched the Lost World, so I don't recall the name. I think it was one of the general flunkies/mercenary guys. He goes off behind some trees (I think to take a leak) falls down a hill and is surrounded by compys, the rest of the group moves on without him.
 
Actually Peter Ludlow dies Hammond's death in the first book. Of course, book Hammond was the exact opposite of the Richard Attenborough character, so the death was rather appropriate.

In the movie The Lost World, Peter Ludlow dies by baby Rex. In the original novel Jurassic Park, Hammond dies by Compy's.

One of the characters in the movie did die Hammond's death, though. Been forever since I watched the Lost World, so I don't recall the name. I think it was one of the general flunkies/mercenary guys. He goes off behind some trees (I think to take a leak) falls down a hill and is surrounded by compys, the rest of the group moves on without him.


Dieter Stark, played by Peter Stormare.
 
As of yet, there will be only one returning member from the original trilogy: B.D. Wong as Dr. Henry Wu. If you remember seeing him from the first film, he was the one responsible for cloning the dinosaurs.

Was that the tech in the clean suit flicking eraser crumbs in the incubator? :rolleyes:
 
In the movie The Lost World, Peter Ludlow dies by baby Rex. In the original novel Jurassic Park, Hammond dies by Compy's.

One of the characters in the movie did die Hammond's death, though. Been forever since I watched the Lost World, so I don't recall the name. I think it was one of the general flunkies/mercenary guys. He goes off behind some trees (I think to take a leak) falls down a hill and is surrounded by compys, the rest of the group moves on without him.


Dieter Stark, played by Peter Stormare.
Explains how confused the two characters. :o
 
One of the characters in the movie did die Hammond's death, though. Been forever since I watched the Lost World, so I don't recall the name. I think it was one of the general flunkies/mercenary guys. He goes off behind some trees (I think to take a leak) falls down a hill and is surrounded by compys, the rest of the group moves on without him.


Dieter Stark, played by Peter Stormare.
Explains how confused the two characters. :o

I like how Hammond's death by compys is described in the novel. It doesn't really come across when Dieter gets killed in The Lost World. Each compy bite contains venom that causes paralysis, so the more you get bit, you pretty much become paralyzed as you're getting mauled by the little bastards.
 
So, filming for Jurassic World has stopped....

How weird really. For years and years rumors of a new movie propped up, then quietly went away again. And now..... filming is done, post production can begin. Part of me is really psyched about this movie, part of me is a little worried. But we'll wait and see. :D
 
So, filming for Jurassic World has stopped....

How weird really. For years and years rumors of a new movie propped up, then quietly went away again. And now..... filming is done, post production can begin. Part of me is really psyched about this movie, part of me is a little worried. But we'll wait and see. :D

I'm just happy the dinosaur, human, dog hybrid power ranger dinosaur movie was never made.

Yet at the same time I feel making a team of super dinosaurs to kill all the other dinosaurs on the mainlands makes more sense to me than this money does. :lol:
 
The ads don't make me very excited for the film. Chris Pratt looks fun but nobody in the rest of the cast stands out. It just seems like a series of shots of dinosaurs killing people without much real characterization or cleverness to the action.

But I will await word of mouth before making a decision.
 
Yeah, just looks like a movie framed around dinosaurs terrorizing and killing people. I got the memo that dinosaurs would be dangerous to people in the first film. No, I'm lying, I picked that up sometime pre-K.

The only remotely interesting thing in the trailer is the idea of communicating with Velociraptors. I'll probably wait for TV to see how it's handled.

:(
 
The reviews I have read are pretty damn positive about the film and myself and a few mates are off to see it tomorrow evening.

Plus the soundtrack is pretty damn cool too.
 
My son is going to see it tomorrow evening at the first showing. He is a huge JP fan; I'm looking forward to knowing if his two thumbs will be up or down.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top