Project: Potemkin in particular received a letter from CBS/Law that among other things instructed us to remove the PayPal Donation button from our webpages. *shrug* It's their property; we just get to play with their toys. 

CBS has no right to control their property because there is proof that people like it?
Yes, that is the situation right now. I made "how it should be" statements.
Yes, that is the situation right now. I made "how it should be" statements.
You are absolutely right. There needs to be more of a quasi-Creative-Commons approach to trademark.
"Trade Mark" is designed protect a brand so that people what they're getting, so fer instance, you don't buy a pair of Levi's which is not in fact from Levi's.
Copyright extensions, on the other hand, have gotten out of control. There's no way Steamboat Willie should still be under Copyright even if the Mickey Mouse trademark is still valid.
I notice one of the new groups have opened an online shop selling fanfilm Trek products to raise funds? It occurs to me that this is likely over the line, but what do others think?
If that's true, TrekCore is not long for the world then. Which is sad, as it's a huge resource, never mind adelight to peruse.
I seem to recall some sort of the same thing being done by Paramount back in the 1990's and again in the mid 2000's. TrekCore survived both. Sadly not every website did.
I was making a point of not naming names.I think just how far folks will go before they receive a 'cease and desist' letter is yet to be determined. How much further after that they have to go before they are formally served and sued is yet another issue.
So many fan films have been doing things that we thought were 'over the line' lately, including one rumored to have ignored a cease and desist letter with no consequences, that it's hard to know anything right now.
Throw into the mix the franchise copyright decision depriving Superman of sole use of what I would have thought were CLEARLY trademarks, even without the whole franchise copyright thing...
Well, it's getting very vague.
Copyright, both common law and code law, is not forever, and franchise copyright is common law, with no code law.
I was told in a personal phone call I had with one of the principles of Star Trek: Equinox that they claim to have talked extensively with CBS legal about exactly what they are doing. While most of the board members here do not believe that this is a pilot for a strait-to-DVD limited series ... well, that's what they claim. They do say they will ALSO be doing a fan film based on the same overall concept which they will be allowed to release if CBS passes on the series. It's all being shot with union rules. Obviously, however, CBS has not elected to provide funding.
That's the only independent Star Trek Film which I know which seems to be selling stuff to raise money. I have not spoken with them since their Kickstarter failed and they started with this selling stuff business. Did they clear this with CBS? Who knows? Was what they told me true? I have no clue. I listen and report.
Just curious: are filmmakers here concerned that if a group does 'cross the line' with CBS, then it will negatively impact on all the current fanfilm units? Or would that just be considered a one-off?
Isn't it in CBS's best interest not to provide a guidelines or guidance as to what is and isn't allowed? Let's them eat their cake and have it to: They can drop the hammer at any time on anyone or everyone and say "well we never approved of it anyway".
Isn't it in CBS's best interest not to provide a guidelines or guidance as to what is and isn't allowed? Let's them eat their cake and have it to: They can drop the hammer at any time on anyone or everyone and say "well we never approved of it anyway".
Isn't it in CBS's best interest not to provide a guidelines or guidance as to what is and isn't allowed? Let's them eat their cake and have it to: They can drop the hammer at any time on anyone or everyone and say "well we never approved of it anyway".
Yes. That's why we are constantly aware that this can all come crashing down at any minute. It also makes any planning for the future difficult.
We sink time, talent, resources, and plain ol' cash into these projects fully aware that we are living on the bubble.
Isn't it in CBS's best interest not to provide a guidelines or guidance as to what is and isn't allowed? Let's them eat their cake and have it to: They can drop the hammer at any time on anyone or everyone and say "well we never approved of it anyway".
Yes. That's why we are constantly aware that this can all come crashing down at any minute. It also makes any planning for the future difficult.
We sink time, talent, resources, and plain ol' cash into these projects fully aware that we are living on the bubble.
That must be terrifying.
I'm behind you guys, though. Love your work and was happy to back the Kickstarter.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.