What is your Personal Canon?

[BobtheGunslinge]

We all have some movies or episodes we wish didn't exist. Sometimes, there are single aspects of otherwise great series that we could do without. With the new reboot and the Trek Lit dueling timelines version of canon, Star Trek is a very easy series in which to have a canon cafeteria, where one can take what one likes and leave the rest. Do you have a preferred Personal Canon? If so, what is in it? What makes you keep what is in your Personal Canon? Or what do you throw out and why?



For my own version of canon, I tend to be a bit OCD about inclusiveness, yet I'm a natural born hater, so I have probably put a sad amount of time into thinking about this.

For the TV shows, I tend to think of TOS as its own series when I'm in a TOS mood, or as an 'inspired by real events' fictionalized history when I'm in a TNG mood, which is more often the case. I also consider Voyager to be highly embellished so I can keep some of the elements I like such as the ship itself and the EMH, possibly a few episodes not about the Borg. Enterprise either never happened or it's in the altered Abrams timeline (which is fun but not 'real' Star Trek for me, either), barring a few elements that carry over into some of the novel I might include in my canon. TNG and DS9 are pretty much what I consider to be the real and best Star Trek (unless I'm in a TOS mood), and I consider 95% of them to be canon for me, except for some of the really stupid stuff and first season episodes.

For the movies, 5 is a dream, Insurrection is a poorly-written propaganda piece by Pakled dissidents (or something...it's just so bad) and Nemesis is just a starship fight. For me, Data is still alive, Kirk never met Picard, the Borg Queen is not as portrayed, the Baku planet doesn't exist, and Remans are just a race of Romulan...if they exist.

For the novels, I tend to include a lot of them that don't involve the TV show characters during the run of the shows. SCE is in. Vendetta, not so much.

 

[TEACAKE'S PLEATHER DOME]

I'm a canon literalist, if it's on screen it's canon. I like trying to fit in the glitches with in world explanations.

I have yet to fail. CANON BABY.

 

[CorporalCaptain]

I hate to be that guy, but I'm going to be that guy. A clear discussion really can't occur without someone being that guy. Best to get it over with.

What the OP is talking about is continuity, not canon.

Every aired episode and theatrically released film is canon. Also canon is the first pilot. Both original and remastered visual effects are canon. Arguably, different official edits of films, especially such as TMP, are also all canon.

What episodes and which versions go into personal continuity is the real question. I get even more fine-grained than that!

I'm not going to give an exhaustive answer to the question, because that would take too long. In the broad strokes, every episode, including all of TAS, is in my personal continuity. In most cases, the original effects and edits are the ones that I prefer. However, where there are conflicts in the details, that's when there are issues that require decisions to be made. Although I admit the broad strokes, I don't admit all the details into personal continuity, because that leads to contradictions, although I'm often willing to leave things ambiguous. The same thing can be said for exceedingly dumb episodes such as "Spock's Brain": the broad strokes are generally OK, but in the details things can get quite stupid.

Just as one example, "A Taste of Armageddon" is a great TOS episode, but it has an internal conflict with respect to just how people manage to beam down with the shields up or without the Enterprise getting destroyed. I have no preferred way of resolving the conflict, although I know it exists. Something canonical in the episode can't be held to literal truth in my personal continuity, but push hasn't come to shove, so I don't really know (or care) what it is. There are numerous such examples throughout Star Trek canon.

As a second example, in the "Court Martial" in my personal continuity, Kirk doesn't really say, "By installing a booster, we can increase that capability on the order of one to the fourth power." That's mathematical nonsense which means that there is no increase in capability at all. I don't know what he says in personal continuity, but it's not that. He says something that actually means that the capability is increased by some impressive amount, that is sufficient to achieve the effect that they require.

 

[TEACAKE'S PLEATHER DOME]

I hate to be that guy, but I'm going to be that guy. A clear discussion really can't occur without someone being that guy. Best to get it over with.

What the OP is talking about is continuity, not canon.

But.. I love that guy!

You have saved ST:V

 

[Commishsleer]

I don't see how TNG and DS9 are so much better or realistic than the rest of Trek when the fantastic elements such as Transporters, Warp Drive, Universal Translators, Aliens, Artificial Gravity, Hybrids Aliens etc are common to all series.

I don't see how the Crystalline Entity, the raised foreheads, the Prophets, the holodeck, betazoid telepathy, travelling between galaxies (with the Traveller), 24th century Klingons, the Q are any more realistic than elements in TOS or VOY or ENT even. I admit VOY used a lot of technobabble and dubious science but it was Geordi who invented technobabble.

I'm afraid everything on screen (including TAS) is canon to me. Like teacake I'm a slave to the rules.
I would like to remove GEN, "That Which Survives", "The Cloud Minders", "Spock's Brain" but they exist so I'll just ignore them.

 

[Amaris]

Canon in D.

 

[bbjeg]

I like to include some of the video games personally. Several used writers and voice actors from the show and they purposely fit them within the continuity (I think Voyager referenced to a video game once and DS9 featured ships that were in games first IIRC).

Anyone remember Star Trek: Borg?

http://youtu.be/UjQJKfG_p2o

 

[Ensign_Redshirt]

I don't have a personal canon.

If I had, it probably were a Smith & Wesson.

 

[bbjeg]

A computer screen is a screen, am I right?

 

[Captain Rob]

I don't have a personal canon.

If I had, it probably were a Smith & Wesson.

When I saw the thread title I thought "My personal canon is my two 9 MM semi-automatic pistols. However, I resist shooting them 'Tomb Raider' style."

I tend to go along with the "Everything seen on screen or in theatres" line. Except there may have been errors in transmission or editing to account for some issues. We can't see everything that happens aboard a starship. Now if we had a series like Star Trek 24. Where we see everything in real time.

 

[F. King Daniel]

Everything in VERY broad strokes, varying a lot depending on what I'm watching or reading at the time. It kind of amuses me when fans consider the spin-off series' to be the "true" Star Trek and not the original - and then complain that the new films, based on that original, are inconsistent with the version of the universe that we saw in their favourite spin-off.

It's something I love about Trek, how the additions and changes made in new iterations alter our perceptions of the old. It's fiction and it's meant to be fun, but too often fandom gets lost in "Nooooo, that's not like my preconception!"

 

[bbjeg]

Personally, I put NuTrek in the same ballpark as the Mirror Universe. Part of the Prime timeline in their way.

 

[Botany Bay]

No ENT
Capt. April and NCC1701
Capt. Pike commands for about 10yrs
Kirk 5YM inc. TAS
Kirk promoted to Admiral
TMP then another 5YM
Enterprise becomes training vessel and TWOK thru TUC. Many years between TFF and TUC.
No GENERATIONS, TOS crew retire.
TNG seasons 1-7, DS9 and VOY but no TNG films except FC.

 

[C.E. Evans]

I hate to be that guy, but I'm going to be that guy. A clear discussion really can't occur without someone being that guy. Best to get it over with.

What the OP is talking about is continuity, not canon.

Every aired episode and theatrically released film is canon.

In a nutshell. Canon exists mostly for licensing and merchandising purposes.

As far as personal continuity goes, though, I simply go with all the TV shows and movies.

 

[USS Triumphant]

All of filmed Trek, except anything that contradicts Diane Duane's Vulcan/Romulan novels, which I take as a higher authority. Also, "Threshold" was the result of Q messing with the Voyager crew, and "Spock's Brain" was a tall tale being told by McCoy or Kirk as a joke, probably to someone while they were on shore leave in a bar somewhere.

I consider material from the other novels, and from the games, to be correct unless or until flatly contradicted by something shown on screen.

My continuity tracks run from TOS - VOY, and then from the events of FC up through ENT and on to the new movies. Until proven otherwise, I consider FC to be the point of divergence between the two timelines.

 

[TEACAKE'S PLEATHER DOME]

It's something I love about Trek, how the additions and changes made in new iterations alter our perceptions of the old. It's fiction and it's meant to be fun, but too often fandom gets lost in "Nooooo, that's not like my preconception!"

BUT it can improve the old. Improve and freshen up.

 

[PicardSpeedo]

No ENT
No nuTrek
"Threshold" never happened
Data is still alive and sane (I'll even accept him in B4's body)
Klingons cannot destroy a Galaxy-class starship with a single shot.

 

[Forbin]

I mainly just try to pretend Enterprise never happened. The rest, I try to fit the inconsistencies together as best I can. And ignore some of the really stupid shit from Voyager, like "warp flight, no left or right", and people turning into salamanders.

 

[Robert Comsol]

What the OP is talking about is continuity, not canon.

My impression was that BobtheGunslinger (welcome to the BBS!) was addressing contradicting canon issues which are the result, not the reason, of continuity errors or changed premises.

Continuity errors are the result of inadequate research, changed premises are deliberate alterations. Unfortunately there is no clear distinction as "changed premise" could simply be the excuse for inadequate research.

I think a good example for inadequate research is the mix-up of Klingon and Romulan attributes in the opening Kobayashi Maru excercise in TWOK.

OTOH, an obvious changed premise is the introduction of the Borg Queen Bee in ST VIII, altering the previously established concept of the Borg (personally, I took Picard's suggestion to "draw the line" to heart, there were just too many changed premises in this movie to be bearable to me).

That didn't stop me from enjoying VOY, but in general I think it's best to rather watch each series in its own context than trying to somehow make it a part of a Grand Unified Theory (GUT).

It's something I love about Trek, how the additions and changes made in new iterations alter our perceptions of the old. It's fiction and it's meant to be fun, but too often fandom gets lost in "Nooooo, that's not like my preconception!"

Since IMO there are way too many assumptions about certain aspects of the Star Trek Universe, I do like (and constantly excercise this here at the BBS, I believe) to watch certain aspects from a different point-of-view but only to the extent that I do not violate established treknological parameters of the original producers of the corresponding Trek incarnation or spin-off.

Nothing wrong to have additions which map previously "undiscovered countries" but changes that overwrite previously established parameters are simply inacceptable and unethical to me, especially when

• these come at the expense of the previous creators which start to look as if they did not do what they are doing (which according to my observations is less often the case than usually assumed).
• these are the result of inadequate and/or lackluster research
• these undo a previous fella's work or concept where the intention to do so is the result of arrogance ("I know better") and/or malice.

Since I couldn't possibly reward any such aforementioned behavior (most definitely not what Star Trek propagates!) by accepting it as canon, I tend to ignore it unless it can somehow be rationalized within the parameters established by those that came first and were first served.

Bob

P.S. All the militaristic overtunes and uniform parading in nuTrek were not a concept envisioned by Gene Roddenberry, IIRC.

 

[BoredShipCapt'n]

Everything except the Klingon forehead ridges, which I ascribe to a mass hallucination.