• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space travel?

TheMasterOfOrion

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
What happened to the culture of space exploration? Do you think a new wave of books and movies could bring it back? Or would it take an international event, like China establishing a manned base on an Asteroid or something?

I find it sad to see NASA and US manned space exploration and space science getting cut every decade.

Do you think there will ever be an era like Yuri Gagarin, Explorer 1, Apollo, Salyut, films like 2001, StarTrek, StarWars, Barbarella, Darkstar, Planet of the Apes, Moonraker, writers like Arthur C. Clarke, G. Harry Stine, Joan Vinge, Robert Heinlein, NASA's Project Gemini.....
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

I won't watch Gravity, because it is 'hard'. I will continue to demand flying saucer space craft, or at least saucer-shuttle craft, and warp-drive starships. Going 'hard' means going 'rocket' - which means: mass-pollution, and going nowhere.

I'm ok with cutting NASA, as long as NASA favors rockets and spaceplanes over flying saucers - for human spaceflight. I want a new national space agency, that does not have 'aeronautics' in it's name.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

StarTrek, StarWars, Barbarella, Darkstar, Planet of the Apes, Moonraker

Ah, yes, hard sci-fi: Fantasy. Sword and sorcery in space. Soft porn. Comedy. Extended Twilight Zone episode. Sillyraker.

Don't confuse symptoms with the disease. It is not the lack of rockets or taxpayer money that is withering US manned spaceflight. The country is divided, bickering, imploding. The Apollo missions were not about exploring and the pioneer spirit, either. They were political stunts to show off industrial might.

Private enterprises with the dream, the will and the resources are busily making the means right now. They're probably not dreaming of space, but a better world.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

Sadly, Gravity is anything but 'hard' sci-fi. I saw the trailers and went along believing that it would be a sort of fictional Apollo 13. It wasn't.

The physics was ridiculous and it had about as much connection to reality as the average Die Hard movie. It was a big dumb action adventure film, and a very good one with great visuals, but still a hugely wasted opportunity.

It has a veneer of seriousness however, and as such still might help generate interest in real space exploration.
 
Last edited:
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

There is plenty of space exploration going on. Why do people keep claiming there isn't?
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

Movies like Gravity don't inspire people to science/space travel. Because in films like Gravity, everything goes wrong.

Stuff like Apollo 13, Star Trek or Avatar do that, because they portray the inspiring spirit, technology and optimism.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

There is plenty of space exploration going on. Why do people keep claiming there isn't?

Probably because we haven't had a huge momentous spacey event in a while.

Mars Rovers are soooo mundane.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

Private enterprises with the dream, the will and the resources are busily making the means right now. They're probably not dreaming of space, but a better world.

Exactly. Billionaire's who are science geeks e.g. Elon Musk have a bettter chance to keep space alive than NASA does or even film.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

Wait, so what are any of those space startups doing other than figuring out cheaper ways to get to LEO? Not that that isn't worthwhile, but it's not really going to "explore space."
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

If you can get to LEO cheaply, you're half way to anywhere in the galaxy.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

Wait, so what are any of those space startups doing other than figuring out cheaper ways to get to LEO? Not that that isn't worthwhile, but it's not really going to "explore space."

Well there is the Mars One group. It's according to them a 1 way mission to mars for some brave souls. We'll see though if they can turn this dream into a reality.

They do however have a creative financing plan of turning a reality based TV show into the trip. Whether Mars One reality TV would be as popular as Dancing with the Stars is uncertain.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

This is the way to colonize Mars...

mars-attacks-opener.jpg
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

^ Mars Needs 1950s Hubcaps?
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

Wait, so what are any of those space startups doing other than figuring out cheaper ways to get to LEO? Not that that isn't worthwhile, but it's not really going to "explore space."

And doing rendevouz in Earth orbit is not getting to the moon. But it was a necessary step.

Private business has never been to space before. Going to LEO is, I hope, only the first step and is creating a vast number of possibilities for the future. It's effecting a major change in the way space travel works. Decreasing the launch price significantly is a big part of it. Even if most of the space launch companies we have today never make it beyond LEO, having that private launch capability, and having these lower prices is going to affect space exploration in a serious way that's yet to be seen.

Not to mention that one of the space launch companies has serious plans for going beyond the neighbourhood, has proposed Mars scientific missions to NASA (and is not far with the hardware on those), is planning having their own astronauts and, to nitpick, has launched beyond LEO twice already.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

There is plenty of space exploration going on. Why do people keep claiming there isn't?
Because it isn't really space exploration that they want. They want the general public to be interested in space exploration, either because they would like for their own interest to be popular, or because they would like to see some indication that the majority of the population around them is still capable of caring about something greater, something of more significance than bloody "Real" Housewives of Podunk, Arkansas or whatever.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

Neil de Grasse Tyson has the right idea on how to get people interested in space in this article:

Huffington
Tyson emphasized that many of the things that have endeared him to people outside of the field of astrophysics — such as "discovering" Superman's home planet Krypton, thereby making real science part of the superhero's lore — were easily replicable by his audience. [25 Most Iconic Superman Images]
"I'm not wielding any special knowledge here," he said. "Any one of us could have done it."


and


In order to help the public continue to understand and enjoy science, Tyson urged his fellow astronomers to reconsider how they interact with the media.
He recalls his first televised interview, which he said he gave in his best professor-lecture style. At one point, he gave a demonstration of how a star "jiggles" as a planet orbits it. When he watched the news, only his dancing hips made the cut.
"I had been sound-bitten," he said.
At that point, he determined to take control of his interactions with the media.
The press thrives on sound bites, he explained. Scientists can either complain about it or go with it. Tyson decided to go with it. He spent time in front of a mirror perfecting sound bites on various subjects.
"Informative, tasty, and makes you want to smile a bit — that's the essence of a sound bite," he said.
Baking pizza on Venus
Tyson repeatedly emphasized the importance of explaining things in terms that people can understand and connect with.
The atmosphere of Venus, for instance, is often described as "hot enough to melt lead." But how many non-scientists have any experience with lead-melting temperatures? Instead, Tyson determined how long it would take to bake a pizza on the surface of the planet and used that as a field of reference. (The answer is 3 seconds; his original answer of 9 seconds was corrected by a physicist-turned-master-chef).
"When you hand people literally tasty things, they play with it," he said. They remember the information and make it a part of their life. Science is no longer something distant that they struggled with in school but something real.
Tyson also sees the value of participating in social media. For example, he has 1.5 million followers on Twitter, allowing him to reach many people very quickly.
"I think it's extraordinary that a scientist can have 1.5 million Twitter followers," he said.
Astronomers and other scientists have a special opportunity to educate the masses, Tyson said. He reminded the audience members that they have experiences and perspectives that the general public does not.
"We think stuff every day that is unthinkable to the public," he said. "Never take this for granted."
He encouraged scientists to share their knowledge with the public in fun and interesting ways.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

All due respect to Tyson, learning to talk in sound bites is a lousy way to present science, or world events. All that does is cater to the ADHD-style of broadcast "news," which is often misleading due to incomplete reporting.

Science and its discoveries can be made accessible to the layman, but they cannot be made interesting.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

All due respect to Tyson, learning to talk in sound bites is a lousy way to present science, or world events. All that does is cater to the ADHD-style of broadcast "news," which is often misleading due to incomplete reporting.

Science and its discoveries can be made accessible to the layman, but they cannot be made interesting.

I disagree. I think finding, "Krypton," or a planet that has the likely real life chractertics of Krypton as described in the superman comics and films makes astrophysics interesting to a lot more people than calling it planet AEY-312 and perhaps encourages younger people to get into the field.
 
Re: Will hard scifi like Gravity get people back 2 science, space trav

I disagree. I think finding, "Krypton," or a planet that has the likely real life chractertics of Krypton as described in the superman comics and films makes astrophysics interesting to a lot more people than calling it planet AEY-312 and perhaps encourages younger people to get into the field.

I think publicly revealing the location of the planet Krypton is the height of scientific misconduct, needlessly exposing Superman's home planet to any number of potentially hostile forces just to get a few sound bites on the evening news.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top