I was watching some of Star Trek: The Motion Picture, and I was looking at the Klingons in the beginning. It's interesting that the more that Klingons appeared in the many years after this, the makeup extremes "exaggerated" more and more. It's almost like looking at a retrospective of a cartoonists work on a comic strip over many years. Think of someone like Charles Schultz, who in the beginning drew Charlie Brown with an oval head, which over time evolved into the iconic round shape. Or better yet, early Bugs Bunny, who in appearance early on had a much more rabbit-based look.
My question is, was this an intentional act, or was it simply an accident of evolution on the part of the makeup artists? I sometimes wonder what would have happened if they'd been slowly evolved-down to a more human look. Seems that alone would have saved a boatload of dough by not buying, over time, a gymnasium-sized load of foam latex!
Actually, I first noticed this when Kang, Kor and Koloth appeared on Deep Space Nine, It was pretty hard not to notice that Kang, for example, looked about as much like Michael Ansara as the Cowardly Lion looked like Ray Bolger! You would think that, at least as these three went, that they would have de-emphasized the makeup extremes.
My question is, was this an intentional act, or was it simply an accident of evolution on the part of the makeup artists? I sometimes wonder what would have happened if they'd been slowly evolved-down to a more human look. Seems that alone would have saved a boatload of dough by not buying, over time, a gymnasium-sized load of foam latex!
Actually, I first noticed this when Kang, Kor and Koloth appeared on Deep Space Nine, It was pretty hard not to notice that Kang, for example, looked about as much like Michael Ansara as the Cowardly Lion looked like Ray Bolger! You would think that, at least as these three went, that they would have de-emphasized the makeup extremes.
