• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Ugly Things That Ruin a Show

For me the answer is Bob's Burgers. Can't stand a single aspect of that show, the animation is AWFUL, the voices grating. The guy's mustache, the weird bunny hat, the ugly girl (a badly drawn Meg) all bother me. I did try watching the very first episode when it premiered, the plot was just as horrible as the visuals. On the off Sunday that I do catch the Simpsons, I immediately change the channel afterwards to avoid even seeing the opening credits of Bob's Burgers.

Oh yes, I saw a picture of the family online before the show premiered and decided right there that I will never be able to bring myself to watch it.
 
Kat Dennings from Two Broke Girls may be built like Jessica Rabbit but I assure you that she isn't an animated character.
And he was more than obviously talking about the color of her costume and nothing else. In his post he didn't call a single person ugly.
 
I gotta say Bob's Burgers as well. The whole look of the show is so ugly and r eulsive it's unwatchable even in small snippits like the ads. ugh.
 
Any TV show I find difficult to watch, for any reason, I just stop watching.

Though in 2BG's defense, the maid uniforms are supposed to be unnattractive. That's just one more incentive for the girls to try and improve their lot in life.
 
American Dad - Roger

I hate everything about this character. His annoying voice, the way he manages to be MORE irritating than the shallow, entitled, amoral narcissists he's patterned after.

How can you not love Roger? He is just fab-yoo-luss!

He's the Seth MacFarlane character for whom that episode of South Park most applies. He doesn't have characterization, they just put him in a different costume to make whatever reference they want to make at the time, and he does it in a bad Paul Lynde voice.
 
There was this short lived cartoon on Cartoon Network that featured tons of neon colors and a character that was literally a turd (IIRC) that I watched for like 15 seconds before stopping out of fear it would induce schizophrenia (the art style literally looked like art made by a schizophrenic that I'd seen in a psychology book).
 
Any TV show I find difficult to watch, for any reason, I just stop watching.

Though in 2BG's defense, the maid uniforms are supposed to be unnattractive. That's just one more incentive for the girls to try and improve their lot in life.
Aren't they waitresses?
 
I can see where the OP is coming from. He's not demanding pretty actors; he's talking about the visual palette and aesthetics of a show. Which, when you're dealing with a visual medium, is a factor worth considering.

Yes, this is exactly what I meant. Thank you for expressing it much more eloquently than I. For something so visual as television, I do think it's fair to judge the aesthetics.

Anything involving Mr. Hankey from South Park. Whenever he's onscreen he leaves shit everywhere. It's sick, really.

I had a feeling someone would bring up this example. :lol: I mean, he literally looks like shit. If I start to think about it too much it starts to bother me as well.

Kat Dennings from Two Broke Girls may be built like Jessica Rabbit but I assure you that she isn't an animated character.
And he was more than obviously talking about the color of her costume and nothing else. In his post he didn't call a single person ugly.

As Takeru says, I was not criticizing Kat Dennings, I was only commenting on the red and yellow uniforms they wear to work.



I've never seen a human being that so repulsed me I had to look away. Humans have more depth to them than physical appearance. Animated characters and the visual aesthetics of a TV set, however, do not.

By the way everyone, I am a "she." ;)
 
He's the Seth MacFarlane character for whom that episode of South Park most applies. He doesn't have characterization, they just put him in a different costume to make whatever reference they want to make at the time, and he does it in a bad Paul Lynde voice.

Yeah, I haven't really subscribed to South Park's view of Seth MacFarlane & co. I never felt it necessary for a joke to blend into the episode's overall narrative. I think Roger's hilarious, and not just a thing to hang misfitting jokes on.
 
Interesting question!

Some violence, or maybe it's the attitude toward violence-as-entertainment. I think Tarantino's Death Proof is violence not done right, and I think Rambo IV is violence done right. Jackass: wrong. Penn & Teller: right. CSI: wrong. The Walking Dead: right.

I don't find Family Guy type violence entertaining, just provocative. Like comedy of violating norms vs creating a new perspective. It's one thing to tell a story or make a discovery; it's quite another to just disgust people and call your work as an entertainer done.

The Hangover is violence done wrong, but it's funny, and if you're funny all is forgiven. That was Michael Richard's problem; he lost the thread of humor and allowed it to turn to vitriol. Also, racism was his problem - as it is for a lot more people than who reveal it publicly.

Also - the club manager should have headed off the problem quietly and not left it up to the act. The club manager bears a direct responsibility in Richard's debacle. The odd heckle is funny. A constant disturbance to the show is the manager's problem.

Also I just want to say, if you've seen Richards in Seinfeld's Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee, you can see he certainly paid a price for that incident, and appears thoroughly contrite, and certainly smarter career-wise.


So yeah, racism is ugly and personally I don't find much entertainment value in the promotion of stereotype - nor in its opposite evangelistic cultural relativism. Perfectly distributed diversity and constant reminders not to "possibly" offend people - while at the same time embracing offensiveness when it challenges convention.

Either you want to focus on differences or not.



Then again, I try no to objectify humanity so that might put me in the minority where human degradation is concerned.

Sorry I guess I went mental instead of visual.
 
I gotta say Bob's Burgers as well. The whole look of the show is so ugly and r eulsive it's unwatchable even in small snippits like the ads. ugh.
Wait, what are you talking about?

archerbob-4_zps26d85339.jpg


;) :lol:

But seriously, sounds like all you Bob's Burgers haters here either didn't give the show a chance or had a bad first experience with it. Definitely give it another chance, because the show's hilarious. I like to think the bad animation gives it some charm. :)
 
Taken the other direction i liked Royal Pains in part because everybody in The Hamptons wasn't overwhelming beautiful like the cast and extras on Revenge
 
I gotta say Bob's Burgers as well. The whole look of the show is so ugly and r eulsive it's unwatchable even in small snippits like the ads. ugh.
Wait, what are you talking about?

archerbob-4_zps26d85339.jpg


;) :lol:

But seriously, sounds like all you Bob's Burgers haters here either didn't give the show a chance or had a bad first experience with it. Definitely give it another chance, because the show's hilarious. I like to think the bad animation gives it some charm. :)

That episode is absolutely hilarious and made me decide to give Bob's Burgers another go and I haven't regretted it!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top