Which era do you prefer, the 23rd or 24th Century?
- Thread starter The Overlord
- Start date
+1The 23rd. I like my people passionate and my centuries exciting!
23rd. The Klingons were the bad guys and everything was bright, primary colors.
R. Star might want to stay away from airlocks.Alternate reality 23rd century. Followed by post-Nemesis novelverse 24th.
Listen closely and you can hear Captain Archer quietly sobbing in his ready room.
^Why, is Roslin coming over?
I think they'd hit it off.
Did Archer ever actually put someone out an airlock, or just threaten to? Because he was about as threatening as a wet noodle.
+1The 23rd. I like my people passionate and my centuries exciting!
+2!
Considering the bulk of the Star trek Mythos is in the 24th century, I would have to say the 24th. Post Dominion War, though.
Late 23rd-Century (in particular, Star Treks II-VI). It might have been the era that Roddenberry had the least direct influence on with Starfleet depicted mainly as a peacekeeping force, but it was still about heroes boldly going forward into territory unknown to them.
He did put a guy in an airlock and began decompressing it, but he wussed out when the guy had 10 seconds of air left.
One time he obliterated a Xindi communications station before it could send a signal of their presence. He worried about the 3 lives killed for about 3 seconds.
23rd. When Romulans were honorable and Klingons were bastards.
Mal Reynolds could have taught Archer a thing or two.
R. Star might want to stay away from airlocks.Alternate reality 23rd century. Followed by post-Nemesis novelverse 24th.
Nothing memorable about the 22nd century.
Listen closely and you can hear Captain Archer quietly sobbing in his ready room.
I'll take my chances against Archer in a fist fight.
He put an Osaarian in an airlock and began to depressurize it to make the Osaarian talk.
Similar threads
