The name "Singh" is a pretty big hint, I think.
Different day, different producers. I still don't see why this version of the character is a big deal. All I care about is if the actor has the ability to pull it off.
Cumberbatch did.
The name "Singh" is a pretty big hint, I think.
Different day, different producers.
Different day, different producers.
Exactly. If it's the 1960s and you need someone to play Khan, you run up against the fact that there are no prominent actors of the right ethnicity. So you cast Ricardo Montalban and you slap some makeup on him. I gather that kind of thing happened somewhat often in the mid-20th century. But nowadays you have different options. I like B.C. as much as the next guy, but he's not the only actor with gravitas out there.
You're right. In TOS, he was Mexican.Are you available for children's parties? Khan is not Spanish.
But you would have had a problem with, say, a black guy playing Abraham Lincoln?
Good to know.
But you would have had a problem with, say, a black guy playing Abraham Lincoln?
Good to know.
But there's no reason a fictional character, Jim Kirk for example, can't be black or Asian or from the Middle East.
But there's no reason a fictional character, Jim Kirk for example, can't be black or Asian or from the Middle East.
But Jim Kirk in this continuity is white. Nero's time travel didn't change him into a black baby.
The name "Singh" is a pretty big hint, I think.
Because, in this fictional universe, Kirk is white.
Yes, he should.
Because, in this fictional universe, Kirk is white.
Therefore, by definition, a black actor is not the best person for the job.
I swear I think trekkies are more prone to ethnic and racial stereotypes in their fictional universe than most people are in this day and age; it's a consequence both of a need to have every detail in continuity pinned down like dead butterflies and the writers' tendency to paint entire "alien species" with a broad brush: Klingons are honor-bound brutes, Ferengi are greedy, Cardassians are cruel. If someone's half human half Klingon, they have to struggle with "violent tendencies" and so forth. When a character doesn't fit his or her racial mold, they're treated as exceptional. You can, in essence, judge characters based on how they look; it's one of Trek's least admirable qualities.
And Starbuck is a man.
Until she's not.
Sisko's time travel would have. Kirk's mom was hot!But there's no reason a fictional character, Jim Kirk for example, can't be black or Asian or from the Middle East.
But Jim Kirk in this continuity is white. Nero's time travel didn't change him into a black baby.
And Khan stayed European.And Starbuck is a man.
Until she's not.
That's the beauty of an actual "clean break" reboot which doesn't claim to have any connection to the prior continuity.
Like, you can change Perry White to a black guy if you're starting over with a Superman reboot.
STXI, on the other hand, wasn't a reboot. Some people not employed by the franchise just tend to insist that it was.
Kirk stayed white.
Uhura stayed black.
Chekov stayed Russian.
Sulu stayed Asian.
Everyone stayed the same sex they started as.
Et cetera.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.