Is that higher or lower than 2009?
Overall that's lower, but the film is only two weeks into its release.. I would suspect it's box office take is higher than Trek 2009's was at the same point in its release cycle.
Yancy
Is that higher or lower than 2009?
IMDB has the release dates here. I can't vouch for if they're all correct or if that's a complete list, though.
Is that higher or lower than 2009?
Overall that's lower, but the film is only two weeks into its release.. I would suspect it's box office take is higher than Trek 2009's was at the same point in its release cycle.
Yancy
Anyone know why they didn't they release Trek on the same date worldwide?
A little less time between movies and 50th anniverary hoopla, and we'll hit $500 million plus for the next one. We won't know the final international tally till maybe late September.
RAMA
I don't see how the anniversary would be of much interest to the casual viewer who will make up the vast majority of the potential box office.
Even if it did, how would it come close to the hype generated for the 2009 film - the first Trek film in a decade, the first to be a big-budget spectacle in ages, a brand new cast, a director/producer at the top of his game and overwhelmingly positive reviews?
I can't see how a new film could be expected to make upwards of $100 million more based on a couple of relatively minor factors.
A little less time between movies and 50th anniverary hoopla, and we'll hit $500 million plus for the next one. We won't know the final international tally till maybe late September.
RAMA
I don't see how the anniversary would be of much interest to the casual viewer who will make up the vast majority of the potential box office.
Even if it did, how would it come close to the hype generated for the 2009 film - the first Trek film in a decade, the first to be a big-budget spectacle in ages, a brand new cast, a director/producer at the top of his game and overwhelmingly positive reviews?
I can't see how a new film could be expected to make upwards of $100 million more based on a couple of relatively minor factors.
The anniversary itself might not be that interesting to casual movie goers, but the publicity of it will garner attention.
I can't see how a new film could be expected to make upwards of $100 million more based on a couple of relatively minor factors.
"Straw men" are what the fan critics excel at.
When I want to talk about the old show, there's a forum for that.
What I do successfully ignore is CBS's ongoing attempt to see me the episodes of TOS over and over and over, as well as their chintzy merchandise with Shatner and Nimoy's images stamped all over it. nuTrek is a breath of fresh air compared to all that.
I think you're constructing a straw man. You could just as well substitute nuTrek for TOS and Bad Robot for Gene Roddenberry.
As far as I see it, many of the most vociferous critics of this film (at least those who are fans) want it to fail, and this seems to be far more problematic than people wanting it to succeed.
But is it the kind of attention you want garnered...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.