This weekend, my wife and I took a break from chores, popped some popcorn, and had a little Trek Marathon consisting of Star Treks II, III, and IV.
And it just seems like blunder after blunder.
First Kirk fails to raise shields when Reliant approaches, in violation of both regulations and his better instinct, and ends up with a bunch of dead crewmen.
Second, after the Klingons decloak, why doesn't he keep firing? The enemy clearly wasn't disabled, and the Enterprise had far less than even a skeleton crew onboard (which is hardly the time for taking gambles in battle). And then when Checkov notes the shields being nonresponsive, does Kirk order evasive action, a retreat, or even an all-out assault? Nope.
Are these the repeated demonstrations of unswerving command ability to which the president later referred? If so, the rest of the fleet must have been filled with grossly incompetent Captains. It pains me to imagine a fleet filled with more Harrimans and Estebans than Kirks and Sulus.
As an aside, it's interesting to think how events might have played out if Kirk did blow Kruge straight to Hell at first sight. Would the Klingons on the surface kill the prisoners immediately? Would they decide surrender is preferable to hanging out on a dying planet? Would they have been able to save Earth in the Enterprise (which is far less easily hidden than a BoP), or without Spock at all?
And it just seems like blunder after blunder.
First Kirk fails to raise shields when Reliant approaches, in violation of both regulations and his better instinct, and ends up with a bunch of dead crewmen.
Second, after the Klingons decloak, why doesn't he keep firing? The enemy clearly wasn't disabled, and the Enterprise had far less than even a skeleton crew onboard (which is hardly the time for taking gambles in battle). And then when Checkov notes the shields being nonresponsive, does Kirk order evasive action, a retreat, or even an all-out assault? Nope.
Are these the repeated demonstrations of unswerving command ability to which the president later referred? If so, the rest of the fleet must have been filled with grossly incompetent Captains. It pains me to imagine a fleet filled with more Harrimans and Estebans than Kirks and Sulus.
As an aside, it's interesting to think how events might have played out if Kirk did blow Kruge straight to Hell at first sight. Would the Klingons on the surface kill the prisoners immediately? Would they decide surrender is preferable to hanging out on a dying planet? Would they have been able to save Earth in the Enterprise (which is far less easily hidden than a BoP), or without Spock at all?