I thought that the movie captured the spirit of TOS much better than, say, some of the latter seasons of Voyager.
As to whether it would be a "throwaway" film if it wasn't already part of a longstanding franchise, who knows?
Would the latest Broadway revival of Oklahoma succeed on its own if it wasn't already an old standard? Or, as I keep asking, would Casino Royale be just a "throwaway" spy thriller if it wasn't part of a decades-old string of Bond movies?
Heck, would The Wrath of Khan have just been a "disposable" space opera if we hadn't known the characters for decades at that point?
The fact of the matter is, the new movie was the eleventh Star Trek movie and the umpteenth Star Trek adventure. Trying to imagine its impact outside that context is just an exercise in alterate history!
It's like trying to imagine if the latest John Grisham novel would be a bestseller if he wasn't already a bestselling author . . . .
As to whether it would be a "throwaway" film if it wasn't already part of a longstanding franchise, who knows?
Would the latest Broadway revival of Oklahoma succeed on its own if it wasn't already an old standard? Or, as I keep asking, would Casino Royale be just a "throwaway" spy thriller if it wasn't part of a decades-old string of Bond movies?
Heck, would The Wrath of Khan have just been a "disposable" space opera if we hadn't known the characters for decades at that point?
The fact of the matter is, the new movie was the eleventh Star Trek movie and the umpteenth Star Trek adventure. Trying to imagine its impact outside that context is just an exercise in alterate history!

It's like trying to imagine if the latest John Grisham novel would be a bestseller if he wasn't already a bestselling author . . . .
Last edited: