I recently started a thread over in the TrekBBS Trek Tech forum titled "One big, happy fleet [FJ]" about the starship listings and other techno-historical material found in the late Franz Joseph Schnaubelt's 1975 "Star Trek Star Fleet Technical Manual". (Franz Joseph Schnaubelt = FJ)
One interesting topic kept popping up in the thread: the history of the United Federation of Planets and how it came into being.
Current thinking in STAR TREK cannon and fan circles is based on mentions of the Federation's origins from DEEP SPACE NINE and ENTERPRISE, which strongly point to the Federation being founded in 2161, so the Federation (according to official STAR TREK cannon anyways) was supposedly around for about 105 years as of the beginning of TOS.
But FJ's Tech Manual seemed very divergent from this. He appeared to be lifting references from the TOS ep "Whom Gods Destroy", specifically the Axanar Peace Mission which then-cadet James T. Kirk participated in as a very young man. There is the very loose suggestion that this Axanar event, "which made Mister Spock and me brothers", was either the founding of the Federation or led to it immediately thereafter. This would place the founding within Captain Kirk's lifetime.
But there's a wrinkle in this alternate version of Federation history: how could James T. Kirk have been a cadet at Starfleet Academy if the Federation had yet to be founded? And how could Fleet Captain Garth have won the Battle of Axanar if there were no Federation to deploy a Starfleet of starships?
In my thread, I lifted an idea from ENT to bridge the apparent gap in history to suggest a way to reconcile official cannon with "Whom Gods Destroy". Perhaps Starfleet, as an organization, was already in existence prior to the Federation. In the fourth year of ENT, there is mention of a new alliance between Earth and other friendly worlds called the Coalition of Planets. In my thread, I proposed that the Coalition of Planets was formed in either the ENT era, and that it quickly evolved into a set of institutions (including Starfleet) that became a kind of proto-Federation.
So, in this view of Federation history, Starfleet and perhaps other Federation institutions predated the formal organization of the United Federation of Planets. A kind of proto-Federation called the Coalition of Planets formed the Star Fleet, designated Coalition Starships with the prefix "U.S.S.", among them the ill-fated Valiant that was lost in Star Cluster NGC 321 fifty years before TOS. Starfleet was fully formed as an institution at the time of the Axanar Peace Mission, which resulted in the Coalition of Planets being reorganized as the United Federation of Planets. Starfleet was apparently carried over through this reorganization, and the foundation of the Federation codified the official creation of 14 Constitution-class heavy cruiser starships, two of which were subsequently destroyed. Other Coalition starships may have been retained to sustain fleet strength, but the Connies were apparently the first true "Federation starships".
If you look at the content of TOS in isolation, it seems to quietly support the notion that the Federation could be only a generation old. To be sure, there is nothing in TOS that explicitly states the age of the Federation or that establishes it as being a century old.
One interesting topic kept popping up in the thread: the history of the United Federation of Planets and how it came into being.
Current thinking in STAR TREK cannon and fan circles is based on mentions of the Federation's origins from DEEP SPACE NINE and ENTERPRISE, which strongly point to the Federation being founded in 2161, so the Federation (according to official STAR TREK cannon anyways) was supposedly around for about 105 years as of the beginning of TOS.
But FJ's Tech Manual seemed very divergent from this. He appeared to be lifting references from the TOS ep "Whom Gods Destroy", specifically the Axanar Peace Mission which then-cadet James T. Kirk participated in as a very young man. There is the very loose suggestion that this Axanar event, "which made Mister Spock and me brothers", was either the founding of the Federation or led to it immediately thereafter. This would place the founding within Captain Kirk's lifetime.
But there's a wrinkle in this alternate version of Federation history: how could James T. Kirk have been a cadet at Starfleet Academy if the Federation had yet to be founded? And how could Fleet Captain Garth have won the Battle of Axanar if there were no Federation to deploy a Starfleet of starships?
In my thread, I lifted an idea from ENT to bridge the apparent gap in history to suggest a way to reconcile official cannon with "Whom Gods Destroy". Perhaps Starfleet, as an organization, was already in existence prior to the Federation. In the fourth year of ENT, there is mention of a new alliance between Earth and other friendly worlds called the Coalition of Planets. In my thread, I proposed that the Coalition of Planets was formed in either the ENT era, and that it quickly evolved into a set of institutions (including Starfleet) that became a kind of proto-Federation.
So, in this view of Federation history, Starfleet and perhaps other Federation institutions predated the formal organization of the United Federation of Planets. A kind of proto-Federation called the Coalition of Planets formed the Star Fleet, designated Coalition Starships with the prefix "U.S.S.", among them the ill-fated Valiant that was lost in Star Cluster NGC 321 fifty years before TOS. Starfleet was fully formed as an institution at the time of the Axanar Peace Mission, which resulted in the Coalition of Planets being reorganized as the United Federation of Planets. Starfleet was apparently carried over through this reorganization, and the foundation of the Federation codified the official creation of 14 Constitution-class heavy cruiser starships, two of which were subsequently destroyed. Other Coalition starships may have been retained to sustain fleet strength, but the Connies were apparently the first true "Federation starships".
If you look at the content of TOS in isolation, it seems to quietly support the notion that the Federation could be only a generation old. To be sure, there is nothing in TOS that explicitly states the age of the Federation or that establishes it as being a century old.