Roger Ebert gives this movie four stars.![]()
What.

Then again, this is the guy who gave Knowing four stars, so maybe he just likes vague, choppy, and pretentious sci-fi.
Roger Ebert gives this movie four stars.![]()
Can someone name one movie where scientists acted as scientists, and not as buffoons? I can't think of one.
The Andromeda Strain, perhaps.
The first half and hour or so are great but the film goes downhill fast. While the acting and the visuals are great, they don't save the clumsily structured mess that is on screen.
The most suspenseful scenes are when it evokes imagery and scenes from Alien. The film suffers from having too many characters and being poorly paced.
On the plus side, Michael Fassbender is fantastic as David the Android and, like I said before, the visuals are great. I also love the use of practical effects in this film.
Also, an urgent note to Ridley Scott, old people should be portrayed by old actors not middle aged actors in really bad halloween masks. The 3D isn't anything to write home about. Overall, the film was very lackluster and choppy. Very disappointing.
Not only is the story basically the most idiotic premise I've ever seen, but they basically stole.. yes, STOLE, two different plot points from duggone AvP (2004).
Can someone name one movie where scientists acted as scientists, and not as buffoons? I can't think of one.
The Andromeda Strain, perhaps.
The original movie was incredibly good. I was blown away by it. The more recent mini-series remake, far less so. The recent movie with Kate Winslet, Matt Damon, & Gwyneth Paltrow - Infection? - was very good too.
I don't understand your point of view. Yes, the movie raises some basic questions about the origin of human life, but it never addresses them in any significant way, except to have a couple of characters tell us that these things are Very Important.I thought the themes were handled well, and I'm glad the film doesn't leave us with a simple answer to all the questions it poses.
Can someone name one movie where scientists acted as scientists, and not as buffoons? I can't think of one.
The Andromeda Strain, perhaps.
Wow...are y'all trying to make me not see this movie?
I don't understand your point of view. Yes, the movie raises some basic questions about the origin of human life, but it never addresses them in any significant way, except to have a couple of characters tell us that these things are Very Important.I thought the themes were handled well, and I'm glad the film doesn't leave us with a simple answer to all the questions it poses.
Where do we come from? What does it mean for us to meet our creators? It's not so much that the film doesn't leave us with a simple answer: the film doesn't even bother to explore its premise and it does nothing at all with these questions; it just brings them up and that's it.
So I'd be interested to know what in the movie lead you to think that the themes were handled well. What did I miss?
Can someone name one movie where scientists acted as scientists, and not as buffoons? I can't think of one.
The Andromeda Strain, perhaps.
Outbreak - kind of...
I don't understand your point of view. Yes, the movie raises some basic questions about the origin of human life, but it never addresses them in any significant way, except to have a couple of characters tell us that these things are Very Important.I thought the themes were handled well, and I'm glad the film doesn't leave us with a simple answer to all the questions it poses.
I just wanna know one thing. Is Charlize Theron in a space suit? (I've seen her in the milkbath. Now i wanna see her in the spacesuit.)
I just wanna know one thing. Is Charlize Theron in a space suit? (I've seen her in the milkbath. Now i wanna see her in the spacesuit.)
Yes...
I don't understand your point of view. Yes, the movie raises some basic questions about the origin of human life, but it never addresses them in any significant way, except to have a couple of characters tell us that these things are Very Important.I thought the themes were handled well, and I'm glad the film doesn't leave us with a simple answer to all the questions it poses.
What else should one expect from Lindelof? Same shit went on with Lost as well. I refuse to acknowledge that last season and that flash forward/sideways...whatever bullshit.
How congruous that the latter half of this flick was, for lack of a better word, shit.
BANZAI!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't understand your point of view. Yes, the movie raises some basic questions about the origin of human life, but it never addresses them in any significant way, except to have a couple of characters tell us that these things are Very Important.I thought the themes were handled well, and I'm glad the film doesn't leave us with a simple answer to all the questions it poses.
Where do we come from? What does it mean for us to meet our creators? It's not so much that the film doesn't leave us with a simple answer: the film doesn't even bother to explore its premise and it does nothing at all with these questions; it just brings them up and that's it.
So I'd be interested to know what in the movie lead you to think that the themes were handled well. What did I miss?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.