• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

AVENGERS: Grade, Reviews, Discuss, DVD & Sequel **SPOILERS**

How do you grade The Avengers?


  • Total voters
    321
  • Poll closed .
B- for me.

I don't know, maybe I was just older than the target audience, but I thought that the plot was very thin. Actually, describing it as "very thin" probably is too kind.

It's basically "bad guy wants to conquer the world, good guys stop him, MacGuffin thrown in."

A lot of needless fights for the sake of fights(Hulk vs. Thor, Iron Man vs. Thor, etc.) and the last hour is pure, numbing action that ends up being boring.

The best part was on the ship with Loki captured, because there was actual dialogue and good character stuff. Still, some funny lines, it was decently entertaining, it wasn't bad, just very meh.

The Iron Man movies and Thor movie were better than this.
 
I was really shocked by how much I liked it.

Going into the film, I had only seen Thor and the 1st Iron Man Movie.

I was impressed by how well the characters were knit together and how the necessary story lines were woven in to the narrative. It was quite seamless without getting bogged down by exposition.

Through the character's actions, you discovered who they were. Whiich is a great testament to the film IMHO.

It was funny and had the right amount of action, and thank goodness there was no shaking camera movement. (I am so over that.)

The Hulk wins out as my favorite character. Is he (The Hulk) going to get another movie with MR as The Hulk? I have never had any desire to see a Hulk film until now.
 
The Hulk wins out as my favorite character. Is he (The Hulk) going to get another movie with MR as The Hulk? I have never had any desire to see a Hulk film until now.
As of right now the official answer is no. Although Mark has said he wants to have one and has talked to Kevin Feige about it and having Whedon write it. The marketing director for Marvel Studios even suggested it was "back on the table" but that was an unofficial comment.

I think Marvel is going to be reevaluating its intentions on a Hulk solo film as your comment is not an isolated one.
 
I think Hulk works much better as part of an ensemble where he isn't the focus. I can only take so much Bruce Banner angst.
 
I think the trick would be to balance out the angst with some hope.
He hopes to cure himself but it's the turmoil over not being able to that has been seemingly spotlighted in the two films to date.

Mark's Banner, in the year since TIH, seems to have come to terms with what he is now. Even if he doesn't want to embrace it like Tony. His line in the lab to Tony and the group about "focusing on helping others" after "the other guy spit out" seems to indicate he's at a type of peace now.
 
I think the trick would be to balance out the angst with some hope.
He hopes to cure himself but it's the turmoil over not being able to that has been seemingly spotlighted in the two films to date.

Mark's Banner, in the year since TIH, seems to have come to terms with what he is now. Even if he doesn't want to embrace it like Tony. His line in the lab to Tony and the group about "focusing on helping others" after "the other guy spit out" seems to indicate he's at a type of peace now.

The bottom line is, stories focusing on a cure for his condition are nothing but "Gilligan's Island" scenarios--by definition, he can't succeed or his story is over. I think viewers subconsciously know this going in, so watching him agonize over finding a cure gets to be very dull because you know he can't find one, just due to dramatic necessity. There has to be some other focus, and the search for a cure only works as a background plot to motivate him.
 
I think the trick would be to balance out the angst with some hope.
He hopes to cure himself but it's the turmoil over not being able to that has been seemingly spotlighted in the two films to date.

Mark's Banner, in the year since TIH, seems to have come to terms with what he is now. Even if he doesn't want to embrace it like Tony. His line in the lab to Tony and the group about "focusing on helping others" after "the other guy spit out" seems to indicate he's at a type of peace now.

The bottom line is, stories focusing on a cure for his condition are nothing but "Gilligan's Island" scenarios--by definition, he can't succeed or his story is over. I think viewers subconsciously know this going in, so watching him agonize over finding a cure gets to be very dull because you know he can't find one, just due to dramatic necessity. There has to be some other focus, and the search for a cure only works as a background plot to motivate him.

If we don't get a Leader vs. RuffaloHulk Movie out of this, Marvel is officially run by Skrulls.
 
I think the trick would be to balance out the angst with some hope.
He hopes to cure himself but it's the turmoil over not being able to that has been seemingly spotlighted in the two films to date.

Mark's Banner, in the year since TIH, seems to have come to terms with what he is now. Even if he doesn't want to embrace it like Tony. His line in the lab to Tony and the group about "focusing on helping others" after "the other guy spit out" seems to indicate he's at a type of peace now.

The bottom line is, stories focusing on a cure for his condition are nothing but "Gilligan's Island" scenarios--by definition, he can't succeed or his story is over. I think viewers subconsciously know this going in, so watching him agonize over finding a cure gets to be very dull because you know he can't find one, just due to dramatic necessity. There has to be some other focus, and the search for a cure only works as a background plot to motivate him.

If we don't get a Leader vs. RuffaloHulk Movie out of this, Marvel is officially run by Skrulls.

Chitauri, Fox has the rights to the Skrulls.
 
So I was thinking about the "blow up the mothership, all of the secondary ships and aliens die" trope the movie played out and came to maybe a reasonable conclusion..
My alternative explanation was, the Chitauri are aliens, they can't necessarily survive in our atmosphere, their suits were sustaining them on Earth and were powered from the mothership. Since the mothership was on the other side of the wormhole it's actually a viable setup, the constant flow of Chitauri out should have prevented anyone entering from the Earth side. Of course Thor's lightning dealt with that, but the Chitauri didn't plan on Thor.

My big beef with the Chitauri was that if Natasha could take them out with a 9mm handgun, they were hardly any kind of threat whatsoever. The nuke would have dealt with the first wave, then send waves of Jericho missles to hit the wormhole continuously while mankind prepares a few guided missles to do what Tony did by hand. The problem was the Chitauri weren't any kind of threat, the Hyrda troops in WW2 could have outgunned them. They really needed to be tougher to take out; Cap and Hawkeye should have been shown grabbing and using the Chitauri weapons like Natasha did, the Chitauri shouldn't have been so vulnerable to a shield, a handgun and some exploding arrows.

Yeah, I wondered about the woman's reaction when he got unmasked.
I just attributed that to what I'd think a persons reaction would be to someone being unmasked. "Let me get a good look at mystery person."
The camera stayed on the blonde woman (I believe that's who you're referring to) little too long, showed her again later, and then she was interviewed on tv. I'm inclined to believe she is going to be prominent in Cap's next movie.

It's basically "bad guy wants to conquer the world, good guys stop him, MacGuffin thrown in."
As I wrote upthread, the plot is similar enough to "The Seven Samurai". I suppose you could argue that film's plot was "thin", you can argue anything. The crux is, how well was the plot executed?

I think Hulk works much better as part of an ensemble where he isn't the focus. I can only take so much Bruce Banner angst.
I didn't notice any angst on the part of Ruffalo, I thought he came across as a very smart and dangerous man who had intended to drop off the radar. I think it could be an excellent characterization with the right story and the right supporting characters. Ruffalo's Banner has more in common with the Steve Rogers character, only without the innocence. He is out of place, yes, but with motivation to "get out into the world" he'll take hold of a cause.
 
I just attributed that to what I'd think a persons reaction would be to someone being unmasked. "Let me get a good look at mystery person."
The camera stayed on the blonde woman (I believe that's who you're referring to) little too long, showed her again later, and then she was interviewed on tv. I'm inclined to believe she is going to be prominent in Cap's next movie.
Maybe. I thought she was just the "regular" person reaction. However, she did a 3-episode arc on Whedon's Dollhouse so he could nudge the idea that she shows up in some manner I suppose.
 
The bottom line is, stories focusing on a cure for his condition are nothing but "Gilligan's Island" scenarios--by definition, he can't succeed or his story is over. I think viewers subconsciously know this going in, so watching him agonize over finding a cure gets to be very dull because you know he can't find one, just due to dramatic necessity. There has to be some other focus, and the search for a cure only works as a background plot to motivate him.

If we don't get a Leader vs. RuffaloHulk Movie out of this, Marvel is officially run by Skrulls.

Chitauri, Fox has the rights to the Skrulls.

They're all the same family. The Fox Skrulls and the Marvel Skrulls are still fighting over the family name. Something about "Stan's Special Sauce" and which part of the family it rightfully belongs to.
 
forgot to mention, the Thanos cameo(too short to qualify as a cameo?) was pretty cool. It was pitched squarely at fan-boys and left you wanting to see how they'd handle him in a sequel.
 
The bottom line is, stories focusing on a cure for his condition are nothing but "Gilligan's Island" scenarios--by definition, he can't succeed or his story is over. I think viewers subconsciously know this going in, so watching him agonize over finding a cure gets to be very dull because you know he can't find one, just due to dramatic necessity. There has to be some other focus, and the search for a cure only works as a background plot to motivate him.

Yeah, I think the big question for a Hulk movie is: where do you go from here? Banner has found relative peace in his co-existence with Hulk. He's a hero now, friends with Tony Stark. A cure story is pointless, and it would make little sense to go back to the military/Shield hunting him down.

Some Hulk stories in the comics take him off-world, but then Banner tends to basically disappear, and it's all Hulk all the time.

One thing you could do is a story where the Leader, maybe working more or less directly with the World Council or whatever, is trying to weaponize the Hulk, recreate the process that turned Banner into Hulk, get a sample of Hulk's blood to exploit, etc. It's been done in the comics on occasion, as I recall.

But it could fit with the rest of what's going on in the film universe, while allowing Banner as a scientist to play as big a role as Hulk.
 
.50 Phalanx or basic high-rate-of-fire anti-aircraft cannons would have chewed through the Chitauri invasion force with more than enough force.

I know it takes time to mount those and it would have been inpractical in that situation, but point them at the wormhole and those worms would have been the only real problem, but lacerated so badly they'd be slowed down.
 
.50 Phalanx or basic high-rate-of-fire anti-aircraft cannons would have chewed through the Chitauri invasion force with more than enough force.

I know it takes time to mount those and it would have been inpractical in that situation, but point them at the wormhole and those worms would have been the only real problem, but lacerated so badly they'd be slowed down.
Okay lets take this real world. A few years ago a National Guard M-60 tank used for armory weekend drills was stolen from a San Diego National Guard armory. After that happened the tanks, PCs and self propelled guns were taken out of the armories and sent to NG camps and regular army forts . In this situation by the time the National Guard or the regulars from Fort Drum got their gear and deployed we would have been a long way from just trying to hold the breech point.
 
My big beef with the Chitauri was that if Natasha could take them out with a 9mm handgun, they were hardly any kind of threat whatsoever.

Well, let's be fair. She could have had a .40 cal. ;) But BW is supposed to be an expert marksman so she could've been hitting them in their "one vulnerable spot" like in the face/mask or something. But, yeah, I agree that they were so easily taken out by an earth handgun was weak. But along those same lines those soldiers may have just been "cannon fodder." They're meant to just go in and get killed to keep those they're invading overwhelmed by sheer numbers while the bigger guns (the ships) do the heavier destruction work. They're not meant to be formidable or even unstoppable as single soldiers in battle they're meant to simply overwhelm by numbers.

So what if the puny Earth handgun takes one out? There's 10,000 more where that came from!

I did think it was awesome how BW managed to get ahold of, and use, one of the Chitauri weapons, also loved it when she boarded the Chitauri air-skiff, back-mounted one of them attacking... Aww, hell, I loved everything BW did.
 
I just attributed that to what I'd think a persons reaction would be to someone being unmasked. "Let me get a good look at mystery person."
The camera stayed on the blonde woman (I believe that's who you're referring to) little too long, showed her again later, and then she was interviewed on tv. I'm inclined to believe she is going to be prominent in Cap's next movie.
Maybe. I thought she was just the "regular" person reaction. However, she did a 3-episode arc on Whedon's Dollhouse so he could nudge the idea that she shows up in some manner I suppose.

I think I read somewhere that the waitress is from a deleted scene which would have taken place earlier in the film and shown Cap (in civilian clothes) eating at the restaurant and trying to get used to the present.
 
I think she uses two Glock 33's, I have an airsoft version, not a very comfortable weapon to use.

According to IMFDB, Johansson uses dual Glock 26s.

Personally, I can't stand Glocks; they're so light I can't aim my shots worth a damn. A few months ago, I was doing a Civil War living history demo at a local gun range, and afterwards a few of us tried out the gun demos for the public. The pistol range had two guns at the time, a Glock and a 1911.

The particular Glock I was shooting was equipped with a laser sight and mag-lens kit. My spread was insanely large, at least for someone who on his worst day has a spread of less than 2 inches on the bullseye. I would have been more accurate it I threw the gun.

The 1911 was a Mil-spec .45, and one of my friends warned me about the weight. To be honest, even before firing a shot I was far more comfortable, as I'm used to heavier rifles and revolvers.

Nailed every fucking shot.
 
Yup, the smaller frame "pocket glocks" are terribly uncomfortable (not that the 17 is much better) and have poor accuracy.

The 1911 range is much better, my 'Baby Hi-Capa" (a 2011 Colt model) is far more comfortable and from what I've read, the real steel version is far superior in most ways to the Glock series of comparable size and weight (26, 33 etc) with .45 ACP as standard.

I'd have much prefered her to use something more like that, but her weapons were probably the least important of any of the main 6 so guess it didn't matter.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top