I'm starting to think that every Starfleet Admiral is corrupt in one way or another. There's got to be a decent one out there, right?
I always think she got a bad rep.Admiral Alynna Nechayev wasn't corrupt in the slightest, she was simply a horrendous Bitch.
I can think of two "Good" Admirals, one died fighting the Borg, J.P. Hanson. The other is the former Captain of starship Voyager, Kathryn Janeway and you might also include Owen Paris.(That makes three, I need to learn to add!)
James
Considering how Janeway treated Lessing of Equinox fame, I'm not sure I'd call her "Good".
Sometimes I wonder how much of Voyager's logs Starfleet actually reviewed upon their return.
I always think she got a bad rep.Admiral Alynna Nechayev wasn't corrupt in the slightest, she was simply a horrendous Bitch.
So she wasn't a fan of Picard, she did make it to Vice/Fleet Admiral and put in charge of several key operations, she knew how to get things done but wasn't a 'touchy feely' kind of leader.
She did her duty, kept the Federation safe, and proved to be a good foil for Picard's inflated sense of ego. So in my books she was a very good Admiral.
The "crazy admiral" is something there in Star Trek for dramatic effect much like the "incompetent security". Imagine how many Trek episodes would end quickly and quietly if security could shoot straight.
Admiral McCoy.
The "crazy admiral" is something there in Star Trek for dramatic effect much like the "incompetent security". Imagine how many Trek episodes would end quickly and quietly if security could shoot straight.
I doubt there's a lot of complaints about the premise itself. Virtually any military-based fiction will have someone in power go nutso. The question the OP implies though, is why there are so many in the history of Trek.
The "crazy admiral" is something there in Star Trek for dramatic effect much like the "incompetent security". Imagine how many Trek episodes would end quickly and quietly if security could shoot straight.
I doubt there's a lot of complaints about the premise itself. Virtually any military-based fiction will have someone in power go nutso. The question the OP implies though, is why there are so many in the history of Trek.
I get the theme of having a superior abuse power for their own purposes and all that jazz. But it starts to feel like Admirals were only used for that purpose.
And I agree about the incompetent securityThen again, that goes back to "This episode would be 5 minutes long if only we'd listen to Worf" idea.
Admiral Alynna Nechayev wasn't corrupt in the slightest, she was simply a horrendous Bitch.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.