• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

When a split season isn't a split season

23skidoo

Admiral
Admiral
One of the more annoying things I'm seeing in the online reaction to the new companion - aside from the "bring back Russell T Davies" chorus; where were those guys when people were lobbying for him to leave 4 years ago? - is this fear and loathing over the "split season" that allegedly is coming for Series 7.

I just came from one UK site where someone in no uncertain terms blasted the idea saying "we're not America!" And a few reports also use wording like "Only 6 episodes will air in 2012; you'll have to wait till 2013 to see the rest."

Maybe it was the excitement over the new companion that's made people's brains turn off, but let's look at some simple math.

(And yes I know the BBC might well turn around tomorrow and make this all moot. But right now this is what we know.)

There will be 6 episodes airing in the fall of 2012. Episode #6 will be the Christmas special, which Moffat has already indicated will be considered part of the regular season (the specials usually are not). So assuming the BBC doesn't insert a broadcasting break before Christmas (which they could do for special programming), we're looking at Series 7 starting in November. October at the earliest.

The BBC and other sources have said the remaining 8 episodes will air in "Early 2013." Early suggests January or February. Maybe March at the outside.

So let's say just for giggles they decide to air the remaining 8 episodes starting in January. Even February.

Now here's where the math doesn't hold up to the fear and loathing I'm seeing. If they air the second 8 starting in January there is NO BREAK. Unless the BBC decided to chug-a-lug the last 8 episodes on a nightly basis over the holidays, there's no physical way they'd be able to show all of Series 7 in 2012, right? (We'll ignore the fact the production schedule for the season, per Matt Smith, is supposed to run into December anyway.)

Even if they break till February, a month-long break is not unheard of even in Britain - there was a break of exactly that long during the season in which Leela was introduced. World didn't come to an end.

Once again, the Beeb might throw a spanner into this. Next week they may announce that Series 7.5 will air in the spring or something or be held to air in the fall of 2013 to coincide with the anniversary. In which case the fear and loathing would be justified (though to me it just means we'll get a short 7th season, is all and the rest will be Season 8). But I don't think it's gonna happen.

I'd rather have a split than face what Sherlock fans are facing and have to wait till 2013 to see the whole season.

Alex
 
My complaint is less about the split than about the fact that we have to go nearly a full year with only one new Doctor Who story, which is actually less than the so-called "Gap Year." What happened to Moffat's declaration that we'd never have to go more than a few months without Doctor Who from now on?
 
Russell T Davies? Joss Whedon?

It's not really the why-- I'd certainly miss Sherlock if it was gone-- but it doesn't make a lot of sense as to why a three-episode show should cause a 12-month gap.
 
Well it seems to me the schedule change was partly because he likely wanted the 50th Anniversary series to coincide with the actual date along with the report that they needed to move to a new studio. Could also be budget reasons and having 6 episodes less in a year might mean something is being saved for the anniversary year.
 
Russell T Davies? Joss Whedon?

I think that would be debatable at times. A showrunner can spread himself too thinly, and at times when Whedon was working on Buffy/Angel and Firefly it seemed that Buffy and Angel seemed to suffer while he was off playing with his new toy.

As for Russell, was he actually show runner for Torchwood and Sarah Jane? I know his writing for Torchwood was minimal prior to Children of Earth, and in fact his biggest input came, surprise surprise, at around the same time Who had the (not so) Specials.

I thought Chibnall was show runner for TW for the first two years, and Ford ran Sarah Jane?

Happy to be corrected on the above but I still think a creator can spread themselves too thinly.
 
Well it seems to me the schedule change was partly because he likely wanted the 50th Anniversary series to coincide with the actual date along with the report that they needed to move to a new studio.

The studio move excuse is a red herring considering they still have the one they've been using for years and in fact the TARDIS set is still there and will be until the Summer, so at the moment they're shooting in both places.
 
I really don't see what the big deal is. So there's some time in between episodes. They are all single episode stories--or at least that's what's been stated.

So, there's been some time off. Better than NO Doctor Who... or the gap between McCoy and McGann.
 
I really don't see what the big deal is. So there's some time in between episodes. They are all single episode stories--or at least that's what's been stated.

So, there's been some time off. Better than NO Doctor Who... or the gap between McCoy and McGann.

Agreed. As long as we get the same basic amount of episodes every season, I don't really care HOW they split it up.

And the fact there's a longer gap this year because of the anniversary seems perfectly understandable and reasonable to me. Or even if it's just because of Sherlock, then so be it.

If it means that Moffat gets to keep being involved in both of those shows, then I'll gladly wait.
 
Thirded, don't have a major problem with it. We'll still have more Who in a year than we had between 87-2005, and still more Who than we had in 2009.
 
I also don't see the problem, although it greatly helps in my situation that I go underway with my ship (I'm in the US Navy) on a frequent basis that I'm often playing catchup when the season is actually airing.

Nonetheless, many British shows have erratic airing schedules and we Whovians are spoiled by stringent, cookie-cutter American network schedule as well as the mostly regular Who schedule up to this point.
 
I am thinking of getting a friend of my mum to record the new season when it airs instead of waiting for the DVD releases. I actually am in the habit of doing that anyway and get the official DVD when it comes out but I need to save money as silly as that sounds, when I got a cabinet filled with Dr Who DVDs both classic and new.
 
Could be worse, could be nearly 20 years between real episodes. And in America they always only showed the 2nd-4th doctors some of the 5th doctor only. I'm so glad DVDs and Internet were available to for me to fill in the gaps.
 
I saw most of the classic Doctors where I lived in the 80s. But they mainly showed Tom Baker and eventually Peter Davison most of the time.
 
What happened to Moffat's declaration that we'd never have to go more than a few months without Doctor Who from now on?

I think he was including Sarah Jane and Torchwood in that declaration, but alas that wasn't to be.

Thanks to Big Finish I'm never more than 4 weeks away from a new story!

I'm more curious to learn what format the series afterwards will take. Its a pretty save bet the special will be 23rd Nov, then hopefully Xmas special a month later, but will there be a series between, after, both or neither? And will we have a new Doctor/producer at that point?
 
I am just worried with how Amy and Rory will be written out than not having Who the whole year round. Surely that is the more important question?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top