Bullshit. Just because someone doesn't find the same things stimulating doesn't make them "unsophisticated".![]()
Crikey - careful saying that around any 2001 fans!

Bullshit. Just because someone doesn't find the same things stimulating doesn't make them "unsophisticated".![]()
The man who made the first radio had people on horses riding by outside. First nuclear bomb used in war, was dropped from an airplane with propellers.I always found it a bit weird that a species only recently capable of launching space probes would have sufficient technology make a ...
The mind rape machine might have been old technology to these people.
![]()
Bullshit. Just because someone doesn't find the same things stimulating doesn't make them "unsophisticated".![]()
Crikey - careful saying that around any 2001 fans!![]()
Why do some people seem to hate The Inner Light? I always thought it was an incredibly touching episode? And yet I've seen it described here as "a cure for insomnia". Why? Why is it so bad?
Not everyone likes these types of episodes. You see it whenever someone tries to inject romance or humor into a storyline. Happens all the time with Trek and Doctor Who and other franchises. You get some viewers who feel Trek should begin and end with firing phasers and warp factor one, while others feel such storylines have no place in "real" science fiction (never mind that The Inner Light is exactly the type of story Roddenberry envisioned when he created the thing). (For Who and other franchises, substitute whatever personal quirk applies to the show, 9 times out of 10 being something created through fanon, not canon.)
I personally do feel The Inner Light is overrated. I don't feel it's the best Trek (TNG or overall franchise) ever. And as you see above there are those who have critical issues with it (but then every Trek episode ever made can be torn apart, with no exceptions). But I have nothing against it. It might not have been my personal first pick for that Blu-ray sampler but it's as good an episode as any for that exercise, really. Certainly I wouldn't criticize those who feel it's the best episode ever, since I'm used to regularly seeing my favorite episodes - and series - being trashed.
Alex
Bullshit. Just because someone doesn't find the same things stimulating doesn't make them "unsophisticated".![]()
Crikey - careful saying that around any 2001 fans!![]()
I'm a 2001 fan. But I understand that it's a film that definitely isn't for everyone.![]()
Crikey - careful saying that around any 2001 fans!![]()
I'm a 2001 fan. But I understand that it's a film that definitely isn't for everyone.![]()
Y'know, I quite like 2010. Sure, it's no 2001, but then again, what is? The underrated 2010 holds up as a fine sci-fi film in its own right.
Now, 2012, that was a stinker. They didn't even *try* to link it back to previous movies. And where was the monolith?!![]()
It might not be 'the best' episode better, but it is a great one. It didn't need to trick the viewer into believing Picard was in real danger, that wasn't the thrust of the episode and it quite honestly would have cheapened what the episode was really about.
That's not what happened.If he lived every moment of that life, then yes. But if he saw that life as it was presented to the viewer, in segments meant to convey the message the builders of the probe wanted conveyed, then perhaps not so much.
Uh, dude, it was never implied that Picard lived only thirty minutes of Kamin's life
Relax.Uh, dude, it was never implied that Picard lived only thirty minutes of Kamin's life
I never said it was. I answered a question and proposed an alternative. Get over yourself.
memory-alpha said:While attending a production staff meeting during the making of this episode, Rick Sternbach drew on his script preliminary designs for Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.
You conveyed my thoughts about this episode in a way I never could.On a side note, its a testament to Trek that many kinds of episodes, many genres can exist within the same continuity. In many ways this episode is simpler yet more profound than anything in Inception, a film which tried too hard to get us to "feel" something for Mal and Cobb but resorted to us caring more about the structure of the film itself than anything else.
This episode might not be to everyone's taste, and I might not be in the mood for it all the time, but it's a simple, effective, profound idea. Jammer wrote a worthy review.
I love the scene where Picard clenches the flute with both hands. I haven't seen a film in the last ten years that conveys the simple emotion that comes across in this gesture.
An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge, the Ambrose Bierce short story from 1890, is the basis for this idea. Adaptation aired on the Twilight Zone in the 60s.It seemed like this type of episode has been so many times before.
Before this episode aired in the early 90's, you had seen many times before a character's mind living a completely different yet fulfilling and fully complete life in the span of minutes?
I can't even think of a Twilight Zone that did this, and they did everything.
I think all right thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that ordinary right thinking people are fed up with being sick and tired.
I certainly am not, and I am sick and tired of being told that I am.
The episode was tainted by the idiotic decision to let the viewer know something Picard does not - that its all fake and he's actually on the Enterprise bridge - way to take us out of the story. It would have had far more effect if we too had been questioning "is it real?" the whole time.
Who in the audience would believe that the last few seasons were the dream and Picard really was Kamin? This was series TV mid-run, not a crappy final episode like St. Elsewhere where the autistic kid dreamed the last 5 years. It's like wondering if "Picard is gonna die of the Omegan Plague this week." Of course he's not. It's a good narrative device that covers the time jumps and shows us that the crew was doing stuff to help him in the meantime. Knowing it isn't "real" doesn't take away from the effectiveness because it's real to Picard.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.