For some reason I find myself on something of a nostalgia trip...to a point. To that end I've gathered together some older sic-fi series and plan to give them a revisit. It could be interesting from a more contemporary perspective and given all the other sic-fi we've had over the decades.
In another thread you can check out what I found when I revisited the original Star Trek as well as find a link in the beginning to a revisit of TNG. More recently I revisited the Six Million Dollar Man and a bit before that Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea. The SMDM's 1st season actually held up quite well with some genuinely decent episodes even by today's standards. VTTBOTS didn't do as well although it still had some decent outings. VTTBOTS often suffered from resorting too often on sci-fi cliches (of the era) and heavy handed writing. All that is only partially offset by the still very cool hardware in the series, namely the Seaview and the Flying Sub.
I've also gathered together UFO and Space: 1999 which I'll go through after Lost In Space. Note that I'm focusing on LIS' 1st season since after that the series became unbearably campy.
The first instalment was the unaired pilot "No Place To Hide" in which the Robinson family is dispatched on a deep space voyage to Alpha Centauri for the purpose of proving the viability of deep space colonization to relieve Earth's overpopulation crises.
The episode starts out all right and played rather straight dramatically. I have to admit that I found the depiction of the year 1997 to be somewhat amusing. Everything looked exactly like mid 1960s except for perhaps the computer systems which were/are identical to every other computer system shown in an Irwin Allen sic-fi production of that era. The depiction of way oversized television monitors in what was the Gemini 12's launch command centre made me smile with the knowledge that even in the actual 1997 no such monitors were possible. And it's only recently that we're beginning to see large flat panel monitors of 70-80 inches and up.
Science obviously isn't the strong point here although I'm sure a lot of it would have been missed by most in a 1960's television audience. Hell, a lot of contemporary audiences probably wouldn't catch the science flubs in this. First was the reference to "other galaxies" when humanity had (story wise) barely gotten out of the solar system. The second (and the biggee) was saying that at the speed-of-light the Gemini 12 would take 98 years to get to Alpha Centauri. Is there another Alpha Centauri(?) because the one we all know is only 4.3 light years away (which was already known in the early '60s) and a speed of light ship is only go to take a little more than four years to get there. Of course this ignores the fact that nothing can go at the speed of light, but this is sci-fi after all so it's a gimme. Another big flub (for me) was the depiction of "asteroid's" slamming into the spacecraft and referenced as moving at 25,000 m.p.h. Excuse me, but firstly asteroids are huge objects and even small objects hitting a spacecraft at 25,000 m.p.h. is going to thoroughly total said spacecraft. Story over.
The episode really borrows heavily from The Day The Earth Stood Still soundtrack and theme song which works I suppose for an unaired pilot.
I rather liked the suspended animation tubes with a glow of light rather than something more pedestrian looking and they depict that these were also some sort of inertial chambers that protected the crew from the extreme g-forces of high acceleration. That idea and the look of it does evoke the similar idea seen in Forbidden Planet. What follows next is a mix of nice shots of the spaceship in flight and it's eventual hard landing with more sci-fi cliches. One of the obvious cliches were the crews' silvery flight suits that were probably accepted without question in 1965 (being somewhat similar to the public's general idea of what a real astronaut's suit would be like), but looks so cheesy today.
After the ship lands the episode goes downhill from there. It doesn't veer into camp, not deliberately I think, but it's so laden down with stilted writing and over-the-top acting. Essentially nothing that follows makes any real sense. You have giant cyclopean monsters in a barren desert region with no inkling of what could support these creatures' existence. The native lifeforms shown are badly done as they're basically redressed chimpanzee and an over feathered ostrich(!).
But what really got me laughing was seeing John Robinson piggybacking his daughter Penny and her pet alien chimp on his jet rocket pack and yet they're not wearing any safety harness while zipping along at least dozens of feet off the ground! The next moment like this is when Don West goes atop the storm tossed Chariot to effect repairs and yet again without at a least a safety line. What's worse is that when he does get washed over and is hanging on by one hand everyone is freaking out about it when all anyone had to do was look out the transparent side of the Chariot to see West hanging there. I know this may sound like nitpicking, but it's all just too ridiculous to convey any tangible sense of jeopardy and drama.
Part of what makes decent science fiction is more than cool looking gadgetry (which this episode has), but also creating credible scenarios. It just doesn't happen here. After a promising introduction this is essentially comic book level sic-fi done as live-action and similar to many similar B-grade sci-fi films of the 1950s and '60s. Of course it has to be acknowledged that this is also largely what the general public accepted as genuine sci-fi: over-the-top escapism.
It must be noted that this episode does not feature the later familiar Robot or stowaway Dr. Zachary Smith. Both of them would be retconned in later.
I couldn't watch this without thinking of another unaired pilot made around the same time. I'm referring, of course, to Star Trek's unaired 1st pilot "the Menagerie" or what eventually became known as "The Cage" after "The Menagerie" became a two-part episode in Star Trek's first season. The differences between the two unaired pilots are really striking. Whereas as "No Place To Hide" played on so many then familiar sci-fi cliches Star Trek's pilot went out of its way to avoid most of those cliches. Within the context of 1960's era television "The Cage" comes across as really thoughtful and adult level. And it still holds up rather well in most respects.
I admit I was more than disappointed with "No Place To Hide" because I expected more. It wasn't what I remembered of Lost In Space's" early 1st season and I'm interested to see if my memory holds up. As it is I'd grade the episode a 2 out of 5---acknowledging effort, some decent ideas and hardware, but really lacking in overall polish and execution.
In another thread you can check out what I found when I revisited the original Star Trek as well as find a link in the beginning to a revisit of TNG. More recently I revisited the Six Million Dollar Man and a bit before that Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea. The SMDM's 1st season actually held up quite well with some genuinely decent episodes even by today's standards. VTTBOTS didn't do as well although it still had some decent outings. VTTBOTS often suffered from resorting too often on sci-fi cliches (of the era) and heavy handed writing. All that is only partially offset by the still very cool hardware in the series, namely the Seaview and the Flying Sub.
I've also gathered together UFO and Space: 1999 which I'll go through after Lost In Space. Note that I'm focusing on LIS' 1st season since after that the series became unbearably campy.
The first instalment was the unaired pilot "No Place To Hide" in which the Robinson family is dispatched on a deep space voyage to Alpha Centauri for the purpose of proving the viability of deep space colonization to relieve Earth's overpopulation crises.
The episode starts out all right and played rather straight dramatically. I have to admit that I found the depiction of the year 1997 to be somewhat amusing. Everything looked exactly like mid 1960s except for perhaps the computer systems which were/are identical to every other computer system shown in an Irwin Allen sic-fi production of that era. The depiction of way oversized television monitors in what was the Gemini 12's launch command centre made me smile with the knowledge that even in the actual 1997 no such monitors were possible. And it's only recently that we're beginning to see large flat panel monitors of 70-80 inches and up.

Science obviously isn't the strong point here although I'm sure a lot of it would have been missed by most in a 1960's television audience. Hell, a lot of contemporary audiences probably wouldn't catch the science flubs in this. First was the reference to "other galaxies" when humanity had (story wise) barely gotten out of the solar system. The second (and the biggee) was saying that at the speed-of-light the Gemini 12 would take 98 years to get to Alpha Centauri. Is there another Alpha Centauri(?) because the one we all know is only 4.3 light years away (which was already known in the early '60s) and a speed of light ship is only go to take a little more than four years to get there. Of course this ignores the fact that nothing can go at the speed of light, but this is sci-fi after all so it's a gimme. Another big flub (for me) was the depiction of "asteroid's" slamming into the spacecraft and referenced as moving at 25,000 m.p.h. Excuse me, but firstly asteroids are huge objects and even small objects hitting a spacecraft at 25,000 m.p.h. is going to thoroughly total said spacecraft. Story over.
The episode really borrows heavily from The Day The Earth Stood Still soundtrack and theme song which works I suppose for an unaired pilot.
I rather liked the suspended animation tubes with a glow of light rather than something more pedestrian looking and they depict that these were also some sort of inertial chambers that protected the crew from the extreme g-forces of high acceleration. That idea and the look of it does evoke the similar idea seen in Forbidden Planet. What follows next is a mix of nice shots of the spaceship in flight and it's eventual hard landing with more sci-fi cliches. One of the obvious cliches were the crews' silvery flight suits that were probably accepted without question in 1965 (being somewhat similar to the public's general idea of what a real astronaut's suit would be like), but looks so cheesy today.
After the ship lands the episode goes downhill from there. It doesn't veer into camp, not deliberately I think, but it's so laden down with stilted writing and over-the-top acting. Essentially nothing that follows makes any real sense. You have giant cyclopean monsters in a barren desert region with no inkling of what could support these creatures' existence. The native lifeforms shown are badly done as they're basically redressed chimpanzee and an over feathered ostrich(!).

Part of what makes decent science fiction is more than cool looking gadgetry (which this episode has), but also creating credible scenarios. It just doesn't happen here. After a promising introduction this is essentially comic book level sic-fi done as live-action and similar to many similar B-grade sci-fi films of the 1950s and '60s. Of course it has to be acknowledged that this is also largely what the general public accepted as genuine sci-fi: over-the-top escapism.
It must be noted that this episode does not feature the later familiar Robot or stowaway Dr. Zachary Smith. Both of them would be retconned in later.
I couldn't watch this without thinking of another unaired pilot made around the same time. I'm referring, of course, to Star Trek's unaired 1st pilot "the Menagerie" or what eventually became known as "The Cage" after "The Menagerie" became a two-part episode in Star Trek's first season. The differences between the two unaired pilots are really striking. Whereas as "No Place To Hide" played on so many then familiar sci-fi cliches Star Trek's pilot went out of its way to avoid most of those cliches. Within the context of 1960's era television "The Cage" comes across as really thoughtful and adult level. And it still holds up rather well in most respects.
I admit I was more than disappointed with "No Place To Hide" because I expected more. It wasn't what I remembered of Lost In Space's" early 1st season and I'm interested to see if my memory holds up. As it is I'd grade the episode a 2 out of 5---acknowledging effort, some decent ideas and hardware, but really lacking in overall polish and execution.
Last edited: