• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

When Geordi cries, do his tears and the VISOR electrocute him?

In their (and my?) defense, gotta talk about something.

And this is a Trek board, isn't it? Isn't discussion/dissection to the Nth degree "our thing"? ;)
 
Because I am a Serial TNG Watcher. I've seen every episode more times than I can count. I do not recall a single instance where Burton mustered a tear in TNG, with the exception of Insurrection when Geordi witnessed his first sunrise with his regenerated eyes. It's possible I could have missed an instance, but I don't think so.
Because we never saw it. Even if it did happen.
That was pretty much my point though. How do you know he never cried while wearing the VISOR? (And also Alrik; Geordi cries in Nemesis too, so you're not infallible. ;) )

I'm not saying it didn't happen. I'm saying we never saw it regardless. Nemesis not withstanding.;)
 
Well, nothing in the Trek universe "uses electricity" but some other advanced power source. Geordi's VISOR also is likely powered by the temporal nodes which likely generate power from his own body's burning of calories for energy. So, no, I don't think him crying would cause him to be electrocuted since the power in the thing is not that great and I also suspect that the designers of the thing would have thought of that.

00? You feeling okay? This is an oddly spammy/pointless thread for you.

True, so like other equipment and consoles in Trek it would explode in his face.
 
If there was a season 8, it should have featured a Geordi who cries in every episode. It could have been the final arc in the waning moments of TNG.

RIKER:
Is Geordi coming to the poker game tonight?
WORF:
What would be the point? You cannot play poker and cry. All he does is cry.
DATA:
...and become electrocuted when his tears come into contact with his visor.
RIKER:
I wish there was something we could do for him. All this 24th century technology. I guess we'll just have to let him cry.
DATA:
...and become electrocuted when his tears come into contact with his visor.
RIKER:
Thanks, Data.
TROI:
Now Data, you do know the proper term is electric shock, right? Because electrocution by definition means to be killed by exposure to a powerful electric shock.

[Universe explodes]
 
...and let's not forget, Geordi surely has been caught in the rain before, which would produce far more electrocuting water then simple tears do
 
That was pretty much my point though. How do you know he never cried while wearing the VISOR?

Because it never happened on screen. That makes it canon. Don't you pay attention to these forums? If a character doesn't do something on screen, they simply don't it at all. That would violate canon. Geordi doesn't cry with the VISOR on....its canon....caaannnoooon I say!

Aw screw it. I tried to channel my inner nerd, but I'm just not feeling it today. Plus my tongue and my cheek are starting to ache. ;)

(And also Alrik; Geordi cries in Nemesis too, so you're not infallible. ;) )

That really happened? I thought Nemesis was reset as a dream sequence when Deanna woke up to find Will in the shower. Maybe I'm thinking of a different series.

And see what's happened now? We're discussing a portion of the topic seriously, so we technically we all lose. :cardie:

Its the TBBS Tosk, bound to happen?

:guffaw:
 
Well, nothing in the Trek universe "uses electricity" but some other advanced power source. Geordi's VISOR also is likely powered by the temporal nodes which likely generate power from his own body's burning of calories for energy. So, no, I don't think him crying would cause him to be electrocuted since the power in the thing is not that great and I also suspect that the designers of the thing would have thought of that.

00? You feeling okay? This is an oddly spammy/pointless thread for you.

True, so like other equipment and consoles in Trek it would explode in his face.

If his VISOR was hit with a large amount of energy that surpassed its ability to contain it then yes. That's why the consoles explode the shields, or ship, takes a large hit of energy that all has to go somewhere and if the shield emitters/"breakers" are overloaded the excess energy has to be unleashed somewhere which, unfortuantely, is the work consoles. It's like when your house or a electrical pole gets hit by lightning the circuitry inside your electronics have miniature "explosions" that damages the equipment, which can still happen in some circumstances even if you have a surge protector. At some point all of the safety checks between two points are going to meet their limit and there's going to be an overflow of energy.

Keep in mind the consoles in Trek aren't everyday workstation computers like we have today, their futuristic consoles that operate at FTL speeds and have high-energy plasma and gigawatts of electricity inside of them. If the system gets over-loaded, yeah, it's going to be messy.

(Though perhaps as Trek wore on the exploding console trope became a bit extreme.)
 
How can u just leave me standing?
Alone in on a ship that's so cold? (So cold)
Maybe I'm just 2 demanding
Maybe I'm just like my father 2 bold
Maybe you're just like my mother
She's missing in action (She's missing in action)
Why do we scream at each other
This is what it sounds like
When Geordi cries...

(oh come on, I can't be the only one who thought of it on reading the title? :D)


Brilliant! Completely, absolutely, award-winning brilliant! :guffaw:
 
If he didn't cry then, he's crying now.
Look at what you've done.
You've gone and made Geordi cry!
 
That was pretty much my point though. How do you know he never cried while wearing the VISOR?

Because it never happened on screen. That makes it canon. Don't you pay attention to these forums? If a character doesn't do something on screen, they simply don't it at all. That would violate canon.
That cannot end well in terms of how many characters we never saw using the bathroom.
 
^Worf, maybe. How do Klingons do it? What euphemisms do they use? And what do they call the ones that just won't drop??
 
^Worf, maybe. How do Klingons do it? What euphemisms do they use? And what do they call the ones that just won't drop??

I'm going to assume that it comes out of their behinds....until we get evidence otherwise....I pity the fellow with a video camera or whatever they use, trying to record a burly Klingon doing his or her business, someone's going to get hurt with that one.....I'm guessing they either have something akin to a toilet....probably in a steampunk style, or they squat over it.

I'd say.....~clears throat~ Qa'Puop'Kah!:klingon:
Though I don't know if Klingons have toilet humor or not....to them it might just be waste.

And for the third one.....apart from needing a little more fiber.......~thinks~.....Kling-ons?

Now, if you'll excuse me, I must go Qa'Puop'Kah a little bit myself. :bolian: ~grabs news paper~ :cool:
 
Since Geordi is still alive, no.

Electrocution == Death

No it doesn't. Not always, plenty of people have been electrocuted and survived, I would even expect that people living in the 24th century and serving on bases and starships where medical care is very readily available it's even less likely to die from an electrocution.
 
Since Geordi is still alive, no.

Electrocution == Death

No it doesn't. Not always, plenty of people have been electrocuted and survived, I would even expect that people living in the 24th century and serving on bases and starships where medical care is very readily available it's even less likely to die from an electrocution.

Yes, always, by definition. Otherwise it's just a shock. A failed electrocution/execution is still just very severe shock.

e·lec·tro·cute (-lktr-kyt)
tr.v. e·lec·tro·cut·ed, e·lec·tro·cut·ing, e·lec·tro·cutes
1. To kill with electricity:
2. To execute (a condemned prisoner) by means of electricity.

ex·e·cute (ks-kyt)
tr.v. ex·e·cut·ed, ex·e·cut·ing, ex·e·cutes
6. To put to death, especially by carrying out a lawful sentence.

No one has ever been successfully electrocuted and lived. It should be an obvious contradiction. You don't continue to say a person drowned after they were resuscitated using CPR do you? You say they almost drowned or were drowning before they were saved.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top