Why could it not be the Q we are most familiar with? Becoming a female(and might distract Kirk) would be trival, and he seems like the one most likely to interact with carbon bipeds.
I've voted average.
It's on the higher end of the average spectrum and there were some parts of it that were definitely better than average, but as a whole the novel just never totally sucked me in.
You can read my full review here.
I've voted average.
It's on the higher end of the average spectrum and there were some parts of it that were definitely better than average, but as a whole the novel just never totally sucked me in.
You can read my full review here.
Nice review. Thanks for the link.
Odd question: is "blind passenger" another way of saying "stowaway" or did you think that Zoe was supposed to be blind? 'Cause I don't remember writing her that way!![]()
I've voted average.
It's on the higher end of the average spectrum and there were some parts of it that were definitely better than average, but as a whole the novel just never totally sucked me in.
You can read my full review here.
Nice review. Thanks for the link.
Odd question: is "blind passenger" another way of saying "stowaway" or did you think that Zoe was supposed to be blind? 'Cause I don't remember writing her that way!![]()
Yeah, I guess this is one of those cases where I just translated a German term in my head ("Blinder Passagier", which has the same meaning as stowaway) without checking if the equivalent even exists in English.
ETA: The sentence in question has been corrected.
Interesting! I was wondering if maybe I had written something that could be misunderstood.
True story: years ago I sold a short story in which failed to specify that the first-person narrator was female. Imagine my surprise when someone praised the story for including a gay love scene!
"Wait, you thought the narrator was a guy . . . ? "
You should have rolled with it, perhaps with a flippant "well, they don't call me Cox for nothing". But that might not have gone over well.
This 'joke' was terrible. I didn't think it through at all. Wow.
True story: years ago I sold a short story in which failed to specify that the first-person narrator was female. Imagine my surprise when someone praised the story for including a gay love scene!
"Wait, you thought the narrator was a guy . . . ? "
Interesting! I was wondering if maybe I had written something that could be misunderstood.
True story: years ago I sold a short story in which failed to specify that the first-person narrator was female. Imagine my surprise when someone praised the story for including a gay love scene!
"Wait, you thought the narrator was a guy . . . ? "
You should have rolled with it, perhaps with a flippant "well, they don't call me Cox for nothing". But that might not have gone over well.
This 'joke' was terrible. I didn't think it through at all. Wow.
I finished Rings of Time last week. I enjoyed the story...up until the end.
The finale just seemed rushed, and a bit of a cop-out, with no explanation as to the true nature of the probe, why Zoe/Qat was toying with Kirk and Christopher, etc.
I've loved Greg Cox's other novels, so it was a shame that this one fell flat in my opinion. Oh well.![]()
Interesting! I was wondering if maybe I had written something that could be misunderstood.
True story: years ago I sold a short story in which failed to specify that the first-person narrator was female. Imagine my surprise when someone praised the story for including a gay love scene!
"Wait, you thought the narrator was a guy . . . ? "
You should have rolled with it, perhaps with a flippant "well, they don't call me Cox for nothing". But that might not have gone over well.
This 'joke' was terrible. I didn't think it through at all. Wow.
I believe it was Josepha Sherman who once pointed out that my old scifi vampire anthology would be listed in a card catalog as "Tomorrow Sucks, Cox."
As God is my witness, that wasn't intentional . . . .
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.