Cinemas in Scotland are showing The Iron Lady at multiple viewing times because they haven't actually given any thought to this beyond it being a Hollywood blockbuster.
A straw poll amongst office workers and friends revealed in my circle of acquaintance at least that nobody in their right mind would pay good money to go and watch a feelgood biopic about that fucking bastard.
I only read one review. Their critique was that it was too broad and unfocused. Basically, most good biopics tend to focus on a defining event of a character. This one just attempts to cover her entire life, more or less. It would have made more sense to cover something like the Falkland's Crisis than her entire career.
A straw poll amongst office workers and friends revealed in my circle of acquaintance at least that nobody in their right mind would pay good money to go and watch a feelgood biopic about that fucking bastard.
I think the response would be pretty similar in any office up and down the land.
As I understand it, it's supposed to be Oscar Bait anyway, so it doesn't matter if people actually see it.
I was about to post that. This is just another in a long line of films - like Slumdog Millionaire, No Country for Old Men, Crash, etc - that is basically released as a lost leader at this point under the assumption it'll be nominated for at least one Oscar
I think the response would be pretty similar in any office up and down the land.
She fucked the country so hard we're still feeling the effects now, she won for various reasons. An uplift in popularity after the Falklands, she got a lot of women's votes for being a woman and people didn't trust the Labour party after the 70s. Much like Conservatives are in power now, and appear to have popularity because people don't trust lib dems or labour.
She fucked the country so hard we're still feeling the effects now, she won for various reasons. An uplift in popularity after the Falklands, she got a lot of women's votes for being a woman and people didn't trust the Labour party after the 70s. Much like Conservatives are in power now, and appear to have popularity because people don't trust lib dems or labour.
Ah you mean where Britain went from the duldrums to the what the fifth or sixth richest country by the end of her tenure.
That isn't to say she didn't make any mistakes.
So lets examine prior to the conservatives coming to power in 79 it was a Labour Administration the country was in a mess. The Conservatives get elected partially because of the way Labour screwed up.
Lets see the country is a bit of mess (due in part to global events) but in part due to Labour so we have a conservative led Administration partly because of what occured during Labour's tenure.
So from History it almost appears as if Labour screws up the economy, and then the Conservatives are elected to rectify it (having to make unpopular decisions).
But give it a few years and we'll be sick of the Conservatives and vote in Labour then get sick of them and the cycle repeats. It seems as if all parties are as bad as each other.
The problem with Nu Labour is that they were, how can I put this, more Tory than the Tories...
The problem with Nu Labour is that they were, how can I put this, more Tory than the Tories...
With this taste of the Tories I'm not exactly sure you can say that, but they were definitely more Tory than any Labour party should have been.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.