The only way to keep using the Borg was to give them representatives, unless you just made them some background threat while the main plot was something else.
The writers themselves were unsure about using the Borg again after "Q Who?" because they had no personality.
That's where they got the idea for assimilation from, so they could turn one of the characters into a Borg "Queen Bee" (that's the exact term they used for Locutus).
They should've saved themselves the trouble and just given the Borg Queens/Kings right from the start.
Precisely. Borg ideology is not linked to a leader and that's precisely why it is so horrible.I just liked the idea of mindless drones who tried to assimilate the galaxy in that unstoppable way they did. Not as some sub-servient beings who bowed down to an authority figure.
The idea of Locutus being the overseer of the assimilation of Earth is a bit different, in my opinion, than having him be their ruler.
Hugh did not represent the Borg collective, that was the main point of the story.But most Borg stories in TNG DID have representatives. "Q Who?" is the only one that didn't.
I just liked the idea of mindless drones who tried to assimilate the galaxy in that unstoppable way they did. Not as some sub-servient beings who bowed down to an authority figure.
What was the point of the Borg in TNG until "I, Borg"? They were collectivist, insect-like cyborgs who did not conquer like the Klingons or Romulans but convert everybody and everything into them. They are antithetical to everything the Federation cherishes: individuality, diversity, sanctity of life and above all the right to decide your own fate. "I, Borg" worked out this difference in the most poignant fashion.We already knew from TNG that you could be "de-Borged" so VOY did nothing wrong in that regard.
Hell, if anything Voyager's "Unity" was a better example of ex-Borg than "Descent" was and actually bothered to entertain the idea of the Collective being a good thing.
Borg kids? We saw Borg BABIES in TNG so VOY did nothing wrong there either.
While a movie like FC could not be as abstract as a television series and had to be more visual there was no excuse for continuing along the path of FC in VOY. The stories had a soapish quality and ex-Drones were Vulcanesque fellows who had some social problems but did not suffer from a trauma like Picard.
Of course, the Enterprise-E easily destroyed a Borg Sphere in FC and no one cared.
Nothing had been said about Borg Probe ships either until we saw one in VOY, so there should be a similar lack of complaints over VOY destroying the Probe. But there aren't.
In the thousands of years the Collective has been around, apparently no one ever thought of hacking into the Collective either. Or using a solar flare as a weapon.
I suppose if BOBW was a Voyager story, folks would complain about the "Sleep" resolution and how the Collective should've been ready for that.
... no one should complain that Voyager could destroy a PROBE ship.
The vessel in Descent WAS a Borg ship, it just wasn't an Assimilation Cube. And NO ONE cared when the sun turned out to be powerful enough to destroy it. No one thought that the Borg should be more powerful than a Star.
BOBW's resolution was basically hacking.
I'm not reaching at all. If the Borg couldn't adapt to be immune to the power of Stars (which are older than anything) in thousands of years, or never considered the idea that someone could hack the Collective then no one should complain that Voyager could destroy a PROBE ship.
Then again, if either the solar flare or "sleep" had been used in VOY instead of TNG, perhaps folks WOULD just howl their guts out over it, seeing how VOY never gets a break over anything.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.