• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

SpaceX is Developing a Reusable VTVL Rocket

Simultaneous launching was, of course, tested with ICBMs in the 60's, but I doubt there were cameras installed on the missiles for a photo opportunity.
 
A full recording of a space flight is inevitably going to happen one day, but it will probably be when space flight is common and the technologies behind it are proven and polished. This will take away much of the wonder from watching it. The wow-factor will be gone. Footage of these “first” flights is what I want. :(
 
YS did state "joke aside". In any case, it looks like NASA is going to have to learn how to do closely spaced launches to return to the Moon by using assembly in Earth orbit.
 
Last edited:
I assume Bigelow Aerospace are still in the picture with regard to inflatable modules. You don't hear much about them nowadays.

Bigelow hasn't been doing well. Here is a demoralizing thread.

Bugger. Well I can't say it's surprising given the economic situation. Let's hope the technology is preserved so that it can be picked up again down the road. Of course, most of the engineers will likely never return to the field.
 
Maybe if SpaceX does well they can pickup the assets cheaply in a few years.

SpaceX hopes to enjoy economies of scale by making a mountain of Merlin engines. A good strategy -- if he can sell launches.

This Build It and Customers Will Come strategy leaves me a little queasy.

As for Elon's plan for a 3 stage RLV, I am not giving that even odds.

If Elon has a NASA sugar daddy to keep him afloat, SpaceX may survive and prosper. I was hoping NASA would keep Bigelow afloat, a day dream that seems less and less plausible as time goes on.
 
Dragon is a payload. You could replace it with a satellite. The RLV is 2 stage.

From SpaceX' website (bolded by me):
Like Falcon 1, Falcon 9 is a two stage, liquid oxygen and rocket grade kerosene (RP-1) powered launch vehicle. It uses the same engines, structural architecture (with a wider diameter), avionics and launch system.
http://www.spacex.com/falcon9.php

Dragon is not required as part of the rocket to place payloads in orbit.
 
Maybe if SpaceX does well they can pickup the assets cheaply in a few years.

SpaceX hopes to enjoy economies of scale by making a mountain of Merlin engines. A good strategy -- if he can sell launches.
They've actually sold a really impressive number of launches over the past few years. Slightly more worrying is the fact that they haven't DELIVERED many of them since they opened for business.

If Elon has a NASA sugar daddy to keep him afloat, SpaceX may survive and prosper. I was hoping NASA would keep Bigelow afloat, a day dream that seems less and less plausible as time goes on.
Bigelow isn't going anywhere, they're simply going into hibernation until the launch industry can catch up. This has really been the problem with space exploration since the beginning: space ships (and space stations) aren't all that hard to build, but GETTING THEM INTO ORBIT is a pain in the ass.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top