• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Army of Fake Social Media Friends to Promote Proaganda

CuttingEdge100

Commodore
Commodore
Army of Fake Social Media Friends to Promote Propaganda
URL: http://blogs.computerworld.com/17852/army_of_fake_social_media_friends_to_promote_propaganda

It's recently been revealed that the U.S. government contracted HBGary Federal for the development of software which could create multiple fake social media profiles to manipulate and sway public opinion on controversial issues by promoting propaganda. It could also be used as surveillance to find public opinions with points of view the powers-that-be didn't like. It could then potentially have their "fake" people run smear campaigns against those "real" people. As disturbing as this is, it's not really new for U.S. intelligence or private intelligence firms to do the dirty work behind closed doors.

According to Redacted News, the leaked emails showed how names can be cross-referenced across social media sites to collect information on people and then used to gain access to those social ciricles. The emails also talked of how Facebook could be used to spread government messages:

Even the most restrictive and security conscious of persons can be exploited. Through the targeting and information reconnaissance phase, a person's hometown and high school will be revealed. An adversary can create a classmates.com account at the same high school and year and find out people you went to high school with that do not have Facebook accounts, then create the account and send a friend request.

Under the mutual friend decision, which is where most people can be exploited, an adversary can look at a targets friend list if it is exposed and find a targets most socially promiscuous friends, the ones that have over 300-500 friends, friend them to develop mutual friends before sending a friend request to the target. To that end friend's accounts can be compromised and used to post malicious material to a targets wall. When choosing to participate in social media an individual is only as protected as his/her weakest friend.​

Anybody see a problem with this?
 
I see lots of problems with it.

But then, we now live in a country where the majority of citizens see no problem with the Patriot Act. And where the major news outlets no longer even try to pretend they are not biased propaganda generators intentionally set on swaying public opinion rather than just reporting the objective facts and requiring people to (*gasp*) think for themselves.

So not much surprises me anymore. :lol:
 
Hahah. Let them try to register their virtual Trolls here. We'll just banhammer them. :mallory:

Oops, hold on, somebody's at the door....
 
This is nothing new; the GOP has been employing people to troll pro-Democrat / liberal hashtags on Twitter for probably a year, now. I don't have the time to dig it up right now, but I saw an article a week or two ago that indicated these goons get paid upwards of $20 / hour to do their thing. (The #wiunion hashtag is a good example of how prevalent it is.)
 
No I don't see a problem. China already does it through traditional means. I believe their price is like 1/2 a yuan for one pro-CCP comment. Getting rid of the middleman and using bot scripts and software is just the next step.
 
Timby

And you don't think this is wrong in anyway?


Hound of UIster

Getting rid of the middleman and using bot scripts and software is just the next step.

Except bot-scripts will be more efficient and faster than humans ever could. Effectively any popular consensus couldn't be reliably gauged; it would just drown out everybody
 
I don't see anything saying what year these requests were made and what specific officials were responsible. Did anyone see any information on that?
 
Good thing I only have like 20 friends anyway. I don't go "OMG 1 MUTUAL FRIENDZ" and hit the "Send request" button as fast as humanly possible.
 
Yeah, I'd heard of astroturfing before, but there's something about it online that is far worse, in my opinion, since there's far less of an opportunity (for instance) to chase the suspected astroturfers with cameras, research who they are, and so on. Unless you've got major resources to go after such people, it's damn hard to tell since you can't connect that online persona to a face and a name.
 
Yeah, I'd heard of astroturfing before, but there's something about it online that is far worse, in my opinion, since there's far less of an opportunity (for instance) to chase the suspected astroturfers with cameras, research who they are, and so on. Unless you've got major resources to go after such people, it's damn hard to tell since you can't connect that online persona to a face and a name.

I disagree, I think it's easier online. In realspace, people can disguise themselves and make it virtually impossible to nail down who they are. When it comes to the internet, everyone leaves a trace somewhere. There is no anonymity on the internet.
 
Everybody

One serious problem is they could use it to counter protesters. They would be able to find out where the protests were going to be then drown them out.

They could also perform various acts of agent provocateurism -- i.e. joining a peaceful protest group then engaging in acts of violence to make the whole group look bad.


Kestrel

Personally I think this idea is pretty horrific.

And sadly unsurprising.

Agreed
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top