Hey, when you're on a budget, it's 1989, and all you've got on hand is some leftover tubing and Gorilla Glue and the writers want to make a social statement about the dangers of groupthink, you do what you gotta do.At least they sort of updated the look of the Borg from their '80s iteration into something more convincingly cyborg-ish during VOY and First Contact (if still a little '80s-ish at heart.)
I think it would have been interesting if there were two types of visually distinct Borg:
We know from "Q Who?" that the Borg were meant to be a species that willingly chose to become a cybernertic hivemind and that they weren't all assimilated people.
I think they should have kept some Borg that we saw as the way they were in Q Who? and BOBW, just white skin. These would be the "pure" Borg who were always Borg from birth.
The others that look like zombies from "First Contact" onwards would represent the ones who were forcefully assimilated.
So we'd have scenes were the less gross looking Borg would be standing side by side with the mutilated zombie ones.
So I watched some STV and I see a lot of comments on spacebattles.com and other sites that Voyager totaly weakened the Borg a lot. Why do people assume this?
But the real culprit is Star Trek First Contact.
Then Voyager goes on to destroy entire groups of Borg ships without getting a scratch
I don't agree. Voyager encountered the Borg so incredibly often, that it made them look weak.But the real culprit is Star Trek First Contact.
Look at how massive the Cubes were in First Contact and in The Best of Both Worlds; they dwarf the cubes in Voyager. This makes them a much less threatening enemy in my opinion in VOY.
Then Voyager goes on to destroy entire groups of Borg ships without getting a scratch, while in TNG one cube took out 40 starships and in FC one cube is back to being very threatening to large amounts of ships.
8472 also didn't help the Borg in being that powerful race that was supposed to exemplify why humans were naive in exploring the galaxy.
Instead this species easily destroyed the Borg, making them look weak. This is just my opinion though, so feel free to rip me apart.
You guys forget Intrepid is Fighting Starship, it's Galaxy equivalent at the least in Firepower. Janeway litterally informs one Borg ship that Voyager can match their firepower and it was no idol threat. Voyager disable their shields in two hits..
If I had a penny for every time I heard that...Saquist said:Rick Berman is to blame.
You guys forget Intrepid is Fighting Starship, it's Galaxy equivalent at the least in Firepower. Janeway litterally informs one Borg ship that Voyager can match their firepower and it was no idol threat. Voyager disable their shields in two hits..
That was a tiny scout ship, not a Cube.
Plus I think the Intrepid is itself a scout ship and/or science vessel more than anything.
If I had a penny for every time I heard that...Saquist said:Rick Berman is to blame.
Rick Berman is to blame for giving us many years of enjoyable Star Trek after Gene Rodenberry died. Yes, it was imperfect - just as Star Trek was imperfect in the years prior to him taking over.
As for the OP and the Borg: "Invincible" enemies, as the Borg were portrayed as up until "Descent" (when Beverly, of all people, assisted by a group of newbie halfwits, effortlessly destroyed a Borg ship), lose their aura of invincibility when they're defeated time and time again. It was inevitable.
They were still cool villains, IMO. And they'll be back one day.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.