• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Religion and faith

How would you describe yourself?

  • Strong theist

    Votes: 15 19.0%
  • De facto theist

    Votes: 7 8.9%
  • Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Completely impartial agnostic

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • De facto atheist

    Votes: 25 31.6%
  • Strong atheist

    Votes: 22 27.8%

  • Total voters
    79
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ha'kiv

Lieutenant Commander
1. Strong theist. 100 per cent probability of God. In the words of C.G. Jung: "I do not believe, I know."
2. De facto theist. Very high probability but short of 100 per cent. "I cannot know for certain, but I strongly believe in God and live my life on the assumption that he is there."
3. Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism. Higher than 50 per cent but not very high. "I am very uncertain, but I am inclined to believe in God."
4. Completely impartial agnostic. Exactly 50 per cent. "God's existence and non-existence are exactly equiprobable."
5. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism. Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. "I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical."
6. De facto atheist. Very low probability, but short of zero. "I cannot know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there."
7. Strong atheist. "I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung knows there is one."
 
Last edited:
I'm an atheist. I have no reason to believe in god.

Our scientific explanations for why we are here (no matter how incomplete they are) seem more probable than the existence of god. The latter being so incredibly unlikely that it's bordering on impossible (see: Richard Dawkins).
 
I agree. Although I label myself as "agnostic atheist", since it is impossible to prove something does not exist and no matter how unlikely something is, we cannot claim it's nonexistent for sure. However I'm about as "agnostic" when it comes to god as I am with unicorns.
 
I am an atheist. I do not believe in any god or gods.

When it comes to faith, I like to pay note to the classic axioms on the subject: The Wiccan Rede says "As long as it harm none, do what thou will." The golden rule says to "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you". In essence, as long as someone of faith doesn't attempt to curtail my rights or cause me malevolent physical, emotional, or mental harm, I am more than happy to live side by side with them and anyone of any faith.
 
I agree. Although I label myself as "agnostic atheist", since it is impossible to prove something does not exist and no matter how unlikely something is, we cannot claim it's nonexistent for sure. However I'm about as "agnostic" when it comes to god as I am with unicorns.

That actually does sound like it's simply a Richard Dawkins quote.
 
I think he used fairies in the garden in his quote.
Anyway:

From Wiki:
Dawkins suggests definitive statements to summarize one's place along the spectrum of theistic probability. These "milestones" are:

1. Strong theist. 100 per cent probability of God. In the words of C.G. Jung: "I do not believe, I know."
2. De facto theist. Very high probability but short of 100 per cent. "I cannot know for certain, but I strongly believe in God and live my life on the assumption that he is there."
3. Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism. Higher than 50 per cent but not very high. "I am very uncertain, but I am inclined to believe in God."
4. Completely impartial agnostic. Exactly 50 per cent. "God's existence and non-existence are exactly equiprobable."
5. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism. Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. "I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical."
6. De facto atheist. Very low probability, but short of zero. "I cannot know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there."
7. Strong atheist. "I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung knows there is one."

I'm number 6.
 
I think he used fairies in the garden in his quote.
Anyway:

From Wiki:
Dawkins suggests definitive statements to summarize one's place along the spectrum of theistic probability. These "milestones" are:

1. Strong theist. 100 per cent probability of God. In the words of C.G. Jung: "I do not believe, I know."
2. De facto theist. Very high probability but short of 100 per cent. "I cannot know for certain, but I strongly believe in God and live my life on the assumption that he is there."
3. Technically agnostic but leaning towards theism. Higher than 50 per cent but not very high. "I am very uncertain, but I am inclined to believe in God."
4. Completely impartial agnostic. Exactly 50 per cent. "God's existence and non-existence are exactly equiprobable."
5. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism. Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. "I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical."
6. De facto atheist. Very low probability, but short of zero. "I cannot know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there."
7. Strong atheist. "I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung knows there is one."

I'm number 6.

What's interesting, is that there is a shortcut between #1 and #7 that bypasses the other 5. It's like a wormhole from one side to the other. I took that motherfucker.
 
I suppose I'm about a 6.5. While I have no belief in god, I think it just as silly (and unscientific) to say with complete certainty that there isn't one as to say with complete certainty that there is.
 
I suppose I'm about a 6.5. While I have no belief in god, I think it just as silly (and unscientific) to say with complete certainty that there isn't one as to say with complete certainty that there is.

It's silly, but I wouldn't say just as silly. Some things are simply more probable than others.
 
I suppose I'm about a 6.5. While I have no belief in god, I think it just as silly (and unscientific) to say with complete certainty that there isn't one as to say with complete certainty that there is.

It's silly, but I wouldn't say just as silly. Some things are simply more probable than others.

Yeah, I'll go with that. I'm just not choosing wording carefully because it's half past 6 am and I've not been able to get to sleep yet. Hooray for insomnia. I suppose I ought to stay out of here. Not choosing wording carefully in this particular thread is likely unwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top