A discussion I had with a friend recently. Let's hear your thoughts.
How far do you think intended character development should be considered canon if it is never definitively explored in a canonical medium?
Obviously expanded universe stuff can't be considered canon, but when it comes to story elements that were developed with the intention of revisting them, do you believe that their intended conclusions should be accepted as canon?
For example:
Data's "death" followed by the clue that his consciousness and memories had been successfully transferred to B-4. Should it be assumed that the intended development of B-4 into a reincarnation of Data became a reality in the core universe?
Ensign Sito's rescue from the Cardassian prison. The last we know of Sito's fate in a canonical medium is that she is missing presumed KIA, but the intention was to develop a DS9 storyline dealing with her rescue, and though this never came to pass, Michael and Denise Okuda's Sito Jaxa character biography states that she was rescued.
How far do you think intended character development should be considered canon if it is never definitively explored in a canonical medium?
Obviously expanded universe stuff can't be considered canon, but when it comes to story elements that were developed with the intention of revisting them, do you believe that their intended conclusions should be accepted as canon?
For example:
Data's "death" followed by the clue that his consciousness and memories had been successfully transferred to B-4. Should it be assumed that the intended development of B-4 into a reincarnation of Data became a reality in the core universe?
Ensign Sito's rescue from the Cardassian prison. The last we know of Sito's fate in a canonical medium is that she is missing presumed KIA, but the intention was to develop a DS9 storyline dealing with her rescue, and though this never came to pass, Michael and Denise Okuda's Sito Jaxa character biography states that she was rescued.