Well, we spent tonight watching Doctor Who, so "Critical Care" will wait for tomorrow.
Would anyone pick Paris?
What makes this episode shine are the comedy bits. The Search for Gar was hysterical, with Janeway looking alternately bored, frustrated, and annoyed. Her declaration that she already had a man--and Tuvok's reaction--were hysterical.
The second is the scene where Neelix extracts a confession from Gar by giving him the shits. Hilariously awesome.
Besides that, it was just a decent ethical-dilemma episode. Those two scenes, though, make it a real classic.
If it were up to you, how would you have answered and addressed that issue?The episode raised a legitimate question--how do you decide who gets treatment when resources are limited? Unfortunately, it backed down from that serious ethical dilemma and reverted to a strawman argument (life-saving care vs. preventative maintenance).
That's why they couldn't answer the dilemma.I honestly don't know. Probably start with basic triage--attending to higher-need cases before lower-need ones. The problem is that there was no sense of exactly how much "stuff" there was to go around in the first place.
Is there enough medication/resources to provide basic life-saving care for everyone, but no extras? The episode suggested there was an endless source of the medicine Tebbis needed, but it was being hoarded for preventative treatments for the lucky few. If that's the case, it's an easy solution--just provide the basics.
Otherwise, you've got to somehow decide who gets to live. I think there's three ways to do it:
1. "Intelligent" decision-making, where the patient's "value" to society is "objectively" determined
2. A market decision--let whoever has the money pay for treatment; those in need who can't afford treatment may be able to appeal to a charitable donor (i.e., a humanitarian agency could buy a supply of medicine which it gave out as it saw fit)
3. A lottery--draw straws
Each of those approaches has drawbacks, so I don't know which one would work best. I guess they're all unfair in different ways.
...yeah, I'd probably try and save them both and inadvertently let them both die.
And this is why I'm not a doctor.
[
That's why they couldn't answer the dilemma.
...yeah, I'd probably try and save them both and inadvertently let them both die.
And this is why I'm not a doctor.
Isn't that what happened to Kathryn when she was a young Lt? She tried to save her Dad and her fiance and they both perished.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.