• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

No. More. Daleks.

I agree that the complete destruction of the daleks that later turns out to exclude a lone ship has been done too many times. At this point it seems unfair that some many Daleks survived the Time War but only two Time Lords did.
I would like to see Susan return . . . or Rani . . . or Romana . . . or Leela
Absolutely, after listening to the Gallifrey Adventures, and Romana's (And Leela's) Survival skills are impeccable.

The Rani... again, no reason for me to believe she'd be anywhere near the Time War.

Susan...Does the Extended Universe leave Susan on Gallifrey, or always away from?

I Think "Last Timelord" was just an overactive Guilt Complex over what he'd done, but, from whole run of the series, I believe we've seen at least 10 Time Lords that wouldn't be on Gallifrey (or in the War)
 
I think the Daleks should get their own show, err.. umm.. a young band of space traveling heroes, and abslom Daak show.. with a few cross over visits from the good ole doc..

that way the daleks are used sparingly and those who are dalek nutters get their fix, with a whole new show of ultra violence ala a chain swording freak! LOL
 
I agree that the complete destruction of the daleks that later turns out to exclude a lone ship has been done too many times. At this point it seems unfair that some many Daleks survived the Time War but only two Time Lords did.
I would like to see Susan return . . . or Rani . . . or Romana . . . or Leela
Absolutely, after listening to the Gallifrey Adventures, and Romana's (And Leela's) Survival skills are impeccable.

The Rani... again, no reason for me to believe she'd be anywhere near the Time War.

Susan...Does the Extended Universe leave Susan on Gallifrey, or always away from?

I Think "Last Timelord" was just an overactive Guilt Complex over what he'd done, but, from whole run of the series, I believe we've seen at least 10 Time Lords that wouldn't be on Gallifrey (or in the War)

The timelords got the Master involved initially, so they were pretty desperate and I would wonder, if Rani was anywhere to be found, why would they not grab her at some point.

Unless she was hiding as a Human via a chameleon arch, which was kind of what I was alluding to with the "how did another timelord escape notice?" question. Since they already used that plot point for the Master.
 
The Rani would bring up the "how did another timelord escape notice?" discussions.

Not that I would mind seeing another timelord.
What's wrong with The Rani having survived the Time War?

Her previous appearances being absolutely shit, for one...
HEH, wasn't defending her prior stories on the show. Still, with the shell of the character (A female Time Lord Dr Frankenstein), I'm sure good stories could be written for her.
 
Victory of the Daleks isn't overly good, but kudos to the producers for brining the Daleks back as a force and not immediately killing them all off en masse two minutes later!

Yeah, it's not great, but it's far from the worst of the season (I don't think I can ever bring myself to watch that Silurian two-parter again). It was basically a necessary episode of hand-waving to unfuck the Daleks so their future appearances don't need to waste six or seven minutes on another bullshit explanation for their return.

Yeah, the Spitfires in space was silly, and I do hope the Amazing Technicolor Dreamleks return to the more muted tones of days past (though I don't mind the redesign at all -- it's just the colors I dislike), but, eh, I can live with it. Sometimes you have to go through a bit of a rough patch before things can get better.

I didn't mind the Spitfires in space, I just wish they'd given it more of a logical buildup. Taste is a curious thing isn't it though, I don't mind the colours but aren't keen on the shape :lol:
 
Multi-colored Daleks aren't anything new in Doctor Who--although it generally was a case of one leader-type Dalek being a different color from the rest of the foot soldier Daleks. Perhaps after this initial introduction of the different-colored Daleks, we'll see a return to the above with not so many "rainbow" Daleks together in one place...
 
^^I think with the whole "officer class" thing we'll end up seeing muptiple Daleks of the same colour on screen together, and not much of all the different colours together.

Jeez, that kind of sounds racist.
 
Multi-colored Daleks aren't anything new in Doctor Who--although it generally was a case of one leader-type Dalek being a different color from the rest of the foot soldier Daleks. Perhaps after this initial introduction of the different-colored Daleks, we'll see a return to the above with not so many "rainbow" Daleks together in one place...

And at least one of the Peter Cushing movies had the rainbow (Dalek) coalition as well.
 
"Dalek" was the single best Dalek story of all time. That includes "Genesis of the Daleks" and "Remembrance of the Daleks."
Nah. Dalek was good - easily one of the highlights of new Who, and would probably give the overrated runaround Genesis a run for its money in my esteem - but all that bloody rubbish about time travellers and DNA doesn't bear scrutiny and that American bloke was a shite character.

Watch Revelation.
 
Revelation Of The Daleks was a terrible story nowhere close to Genesis, but I do wish the two Troughton Dalek stories were still around since they were great stories. But I can't imagine Dr. Who without the Daleks and we still have no idea how much the BBC paid for their use.
 
Revelation Of The Daleks was a terrible story nowhere close to Genesis...
It's a terrible story, is it? And why's that then? :borg:

For one thing it's more about Davros than the Daleks, the sets look terrible, the acting is prety bad and the violence is rarely needed in most of the scenes. And worse still the Doctor is pretty much useless in the story and I could've done without the DJ. Orcini is the only cahracter in the story that I remotely cared about since he was the only one with any real depth to him.
 
Now a Dalek companion for the Doctor would be awesome.

:guffaw:

CLASSIC.

that would be so cool. A Dalek with a heart and a taste for adventure. Dunno what skimpy clothes they could where, maybe a more seductive version of the utility belt thing in Victory of the Daleks last year, like a man-kini design, or just put nipples on every bump with a multi cup bra.

They do have breasts...wait, I mean, Dalek bumps


LOL.



Speaking of Dalek bumps...

On friday we get to see Moffats first Who comic relief work since Curse of the Fatal Death. Im looking forward to it. :techman:
 
Revelation Of The Daleks was a terrible story nowhere close to Genesis...
It's a terrible story, is it? And why's that then? :borg:

For one thing it's more about Davros than the Daleks, the sets look terrible, the acting is prety bad and the violence is rarely needed in most of the scenes. And worse still the Doctor is pretty much useless in the story and I could've done without the DJ. Orcini is the only cahracter in the story that I remotely cared about since he was the only one with any real depth to him.
Yes it is, no they don't, no it isn't, everyone loves a bit of violence, and if the relatively low Doctor involvement bothers you then I suppose you disliked Blink as well. Revelation is a brilliant story, as intricate as Androzani (if not Kinda). It's quite a brilliant piece, populated with many engaging yet grostesque characters, and it's easily the best use of Davros. A mad twisted man getting people to eat their own families and laughing like a loon. Revelation's a classic.
 
It's a terrible story, is it? And why's that then? :borg:

For one thing it's more about Davros than the Daleks, the sets look terrible, the acting is prety bad and the violence is rarely needed in most of the scenes. And worse still the Doctor is pretty much useless in the story and I could've done without the DJ. Orcini is the only cahracter in the story that I remotely cared about since he was the only one with any real depth to him.
Yes it is, no they don't, no it isn't, everyone loves a bit of violence, and if the relatively low Doctor involvement bothers you then I suppose you disliked Blink as well. Revelation is a brilliant story, as intricate as Androzani (if not Kinda). It's quite a brilliant piece, populated with many engaging yet grostesque characters, and it's easily the best use of Davros. A mad twisted man getting people to eat their own families and laughing like a loon. Revelation's a classic.

Yeah everbody LOVES violence I guess that includes Mary Whitehouse. :guffaw::guffaw: In any event it's more like a French slasher horror movie than a Dr. Who story. We never see hands get blasted off or multiple stabbing on the show really ever since they introduced Davros the Dalek stories were more about him than the Daleks themselves and there was still no explaination for how he survived Resurrection.

IMO Blink is overrated and Eric Saward really only wrote one really good Dr. Who story and that was The Visitation, it's more than alittle difficult to defend either of his Dalek stories or Timelash for that matter. Some people liked some people didn't. But it's not a great story in my mind.
 
Last edited:
I love the Daleks, it's the only reason I watch the show anymore.

If they're not appearing in Season Six, I won't be watching. I only saw three episodes last season, and two episodes the year before that.
 
For one thing it's more about Davros than the Daleks, the sets look terrible, the acting is prety bad and the violence is rarely needed in most of the scenes. And worse still the Doctor is pretty much useless in the story and I could've done without the DJ. Orcini is the only cahracter in the story that I remotely cared about since he was the only one with any real depth to him.
Yes it is, no they don't, no it isn't, everyone loves a bit of violence, and if the relatively low Doctor involvement bothers you then I suppose you disliked Blink as well. Revelation is a brilliant story, as intricate as Androzani (if not Kinda). It's quite a brilliant piece, populated with many engaging yet grostesque characters, and it's easily the best use of Davros. A mad twisted man getting people to eat their own families and laughing like a loon. Revelation's a classic.

Yeah everbody LOVES violence I guess that includes Mary Whitehouse. :guffaw::guffaw: In any event it's more like a French slasher horror movie than a Dr. Who story. We never see hands get blasted off or multiple stabbing on the show really ever since they introduced Davros the Dalek stories were more about him than the Daleks themselves and there was still no explaination for how he survived Resurrection.

IMO Blink is overrated and Eric Saward really only wrote one really good Dr. Who story and that was The Visitation, it's more than alittle difficult to defend either of his Dalek stories or Timelash for that matter. Some people liked some people didn't. But it's not a great story in my mind.
The Visitation over Revelation? Really?

See, much as I like the weirdo tone of Revelation and the general grimness and violence that Saward brought to the show (gawd only knows that as soon as he went we got the anodyne and pretty subpar season 24), it's the quality of the story that I really love, as well as the production. It's a fantastic piece of writing, combined with terrific direction. Caves is much the same, and pretty grim and violent to boot; d'you hate that too?

As for it being more about Davros than the Daleks, it doesn't pretend to be anything else. If it's a lack of tinpot action you don't like, then did you only watch one story every 4 years? Besides, one of the feckers even blows up.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top