Jesus fuck-all Christ, do you people read? None of us are defining success as strictly financial. I am only arguing that it was financially successful because some other poster was trying to claim that it wasn't.
Or "They copied Star Wars."Jesus fuck-all Christ, do you people read? None of us are defining success as strictly financial. I am only arguing that it was financially successful because some other poster was trying to claim that it wasn't.
This is an ongoing shell game. If you consider the film to be good quality entertainment they'll claim it was a financial disappointment. If you point them to the easily available facts demonstrating its success, they switch to the quality argument.
I prefer to stick with what's quantifiable - the film's commercial success, unparalleled in Trek's history - simply because it makes the contortions of the naysayers a little bit tougher. "It's not high quality" is directly translatable as "I don't like it."
Or "They copied Star Wars."
number6 said:The only thing this has in common with Star Wars is that it takes place in space.
Or "They copied Star Wars."
Vulcan is destroyed in front of Spock's eyes.
Alderaan is destroyed in front of Leia's eyes.
Yes. Do you think the destruction of Earth in ENT's Xindi arc was copying Star Wars?? How about Vulcan mysticism and its similarity to the Force?? Good vs. Evil is only a plot device that Star Wars used?? Growing up without a father?? Seriously??You already said...
number6 said:The only thing this has in common with Star Wars is that it takes place in space.
So you feel that the destruction of Vulcan in front of Spock more resembles Trek instead of Star Wars, even though the exact same thing happens in Star Wars?
First.. I object to you calling me a fanboy.This really just seems like fanboys that refuse any criticism of the movie or any comparison to Star Wars as somehow that's a negative which I'm not sure why.
I'm not comparing Trek 09 to TMP. You are.
TMP was a bad film. It had a weak TV pilot script which was padded with endless and expensive SFX sequences.
Who knows.. All I know is that I waiting in the freezing cold on Dec 7th 1979 to see TMP in the theatre and that was my opinion then as it is now. I enjoyed this film more. I think they nailed the characters of younger versions of Kirk and Spock in a way that TMP couldn't accomplish with its creator at the helm. The actual SFX are frankly a given.. All the ST films have had believable SFX work. TMP relied on it too much at the expense of story than the other films did.I'm not comparing Trek 09 to TMP. You are.
TMP was a bad film. It had a weak TV pilot script which was padded with endless and expensive SFX sequences.
Would everyone be so high on Star Trek 2009 if it didn't have $80-90 million dollars worth of special effects backing it up?
And you're saying that no one in any movie from here on out can destroy a planet while someone watches without it being like Star Wars?
And you're saying that no one in any movie from here on out can destroy a planet while someone watches without it being like Star Wars?
No. But when the director acknowledges that he's more a fan of Star Wars and the star says his inspiration for Jim Kirk is Han Solo... then you get this funny feeling deep down inside that they are targeting the audiences of those particular films. YMMV.
And you're saying that no one in any movie from here on out can destroy a planet while someone watches without it being like Star Wars?
Each story features a main hero forced by the main villain to watch as his/her homeworld is destroyed. How is this not extremely similar?
JJ also got Ben Burtt to do the sound design. This really gets me because I am an audio engineer and I have done a lot of sound design.. Burtt is a hardcore TOS fan as he was when he created the sound design for the 1977 SW film.. So the similarities are there, but then a lot of those sounds were inspired by TOS in the first place!! If you listen close enough, the background sound in Obi Wan's home is the TOS shuttlecraft interior.You were right, number6, it does all just go back to JJ making a comment on how he liked Star Wars more. There's no real basis for any argument here.
Questions about the importance of the effects are red herrings and non-starters - if you spend less money on effects you make a different movie.
Would you like a partial list of westerns that feature gun fights on the main street of a small town?
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.