I've been noticing a trend. It's been going really since the show came back, but it's gotten worse since RTD dug the Macra back out of obscurity in Gridlock. And that is this constant speculation/blind hope that Omega and the Rani are coming back to Doctor Who. I just watched a shot-by-shot analysis of the 2011 "Coming Soon" trailer on YouTube and the guy kept going on about how he thinks this shot means Omega is coming back and that shot means River (or Amy) is the Rani. (I'm not bothering spoiler coding that because it ain't gonna happen.)
A couple years ago it was "Donna Noble is the Rani" and Omega was going to be the big bad in The Stolen Earth.
Before that, Rani Chandra of Sarah Jane Adventures was going to be the Rani because, well...
And before that Rose was going to end up becoming the Rani because of being abandoned at the end of Doomsday.
I mean, OK, RTD set precedent by the surprise appearance of the Macra. So it's not impossible that Steven Moffat could pull another obscure villain out the hat. But why exactly is everyone pulling for these two?
Omega appeared twice: The Three Doctors and Arc of Infinity, plus a shoutout in The Five Doctors. Neither of those stories are really considered classics: Three Doctors is only fondly remembered because of the reunion aspect and the fact it finally allowed the Third Doctor to cut his strings to earth. Arc of Infinity is remembered primarily for the Amsterdam filming and the guest appearance by Colin Baker. (Yes I know Omega appeared in audio dramas, too, but 99% of the audience is only going to know the TV appearances. Ditto the Rani.)
The Rani fares even worse: her three and only appearances were in stories that are generally considered among the worst Doctor Who stories of all time: Mark of the Rani, the notorious Time and the Rani (I just read a 1987 issue of Dreamwatch Bulletin (DWB) and I swear the critics of Enterprise just cut-and-pasted the comments made there about McCoy's debut story), and Dimensions in Time, which was so bad the fanbase actually successfully rendered it non-canon even in the eyes of the BBC (Trekkies, try as they might, haven't managed that trick with Spock's Brain, or Enterprise, now have they).
There are plenty of better-regarded old-school villains out there that could be brought back. Why the constant push for those two?
I mean, hey, if Moffat and his team come up with a kick-ass story that brings back the Rani or Omega, more power to them. But I'd rather they create new villains if possible, myself. Or if they want to feature an obscure one, let's see the Terrible Zodin (who was already namechecked in The Sarah Jane Adventures anyway).
Alex
A couple years ago it was "Donna Noble is the Rani" and Omega was going to be the big bad in The Stolen Earth.
Before that, Rani Chandra of Sarah Jane Adventures was going to be the Rani because, well...
And before that Rose was going to end up becoming the Rani because of being abandoned at the end of Doomsday.
I mean, OK, RTD set precedent by the surprise appearance of the Macra. So it's not impossible that Steven Moffat could pull another obscure villain out the hat. But why exactly is everyone pulling for these two?
Omega appeared twice: The Three Doctors and Arc of Infinity, plus a shoutout in The Five Doctors. Neither of those stories are really considered classics: Three Doctors is only fondly remembered because of the reunion aspect and the fact it finally allowed the Third Doctor to cut his strings to earth. Arc of Infinity is remembered primarily for the Amsterdam filming and the guest appearance by Colin Baker. (Yes I know Omega appeared in audio dramas, too, but 99% of the audience is only going to know the TV appearances. Ditto the Rani.)
The Rani fares even worse: her three and only appearances were in stories that are generally considered among the worst Doctor Who stories of all time: Mark of the Rani, the notorious Time and the Rani (I just read a 1987 issue of Dreamwatch Bulletin (DWB) and I swear the critics of Enterprise just cut-and-pasted the comments made there about McCoy's debut story), and Dimensions in Time, which was so bad the fanbase actually successfully rendered it non-canon even in the eyes of the BBC (Trekkies, try as they might, haven't managed that trick with Spock's Brain, or Enterprise, now have they).
There are plenty of better-regarded old-school villains out there that could be brought back. Why the constant push for those two?
I mean, hey, if Moffat and his team come up with a kick-ass story that brings back the Rani or Omega, more power to them. But I'd rather they create new villains if possible, myself. Or if they want to feature an obscure one, let's see the Terrible Zodin (who was already namechecked in The Sarah Jane Adventures anyway).
Alex