I haven't been on a Star Trek internet forum since about 2003 (I suspect many of you were young'uns when St-Intel was around), but I thought I'd ask this question: Is the Federation too powerful?
It's a federation of 150 worlds (maybe fewer powers) but though numerous, are generally unaggressive and see a benefit in collective defence than having their own independent military. There is probably great range in the power of the UFP member states - some may be very populus (Earth, Vulcan, Andoria), but I bet most are small outliers and ex-colonies.
So how can a seemingly weak federation of scaredy-cat states manage, by 2378 to destroy the Borg, take a leading role in the containing the Dominion, and be the most (military) technologically advanced powers in the Alpha/Beta quadrant?
There is argument that a broad base of many different races and species in the Federation can pool their talents and invent new technologies, but Starfleet ships/technology are too consistent in terms of design to be a compromise of 150 different design inputs. Just imagine the variety of ships, technology etc that you would get from 150 different viewpoints, it seems unlikely that they could agree on one.
IMO the Federation probably deserves to be a top-ranking power due to technological and resource diversity, but militarily I can't see it. I see Starfleet as an organisation of powers pooling in lots of their own ships and manpower all with various levels of potentcy (like how if you grouped all the World's navies together for example) but with only a few common designs of technology and ships.
Anyway, in summary I think the Federation would be too compromised by its non-aggressive stance and diversity in membership to field a singular, coherent and powerful military force.
Discuss
It's a federation of 150 worlds (maybe fewer powers) but though numerous, are generally unaggressive and see a benefit in collective defence than having their own independent military. There is probably great range in the power of the UFP member states - some may be very populus (Earth, Vulcan, Andoria), but I bet most are small outliers and ex-colonies.
So how can a seemingly weak federation of scaredy-cat states manage, by 2378 to destroy the Borg, take a leading role in the containing the Dominion, and be the most (military) technologically advanced powers in the Alpha/Beta quadrant?
There is argument that a broad base of many different races and species in the Federation can pool their talents and invent new technologies, but Starfleet ships/technology are too consistent in terms of design to be a compromise of 150 different design inputs. Just imagine the variety of ships, technology etc that you would get from 150 different viewpoints, it seems unlikely that they could agree on one.
IMO the Federation probably deserves to be a top-ranking power due to technological and resource diversity, but militarily I can't see it. I see Starfleet as an organisation of powers pooling in lots of their own ships and manpower all with various levels of potentcy (like how if you grouped all the World's navies together for example) but with only a few common designs of technology and ships.
Anyway, in summary I think the Federation would be too compromised by its non-aggressive stance and diversity in membership to field a singular, coherent and powerful military force.
Discuss
