Seinfeld.
The perfect example of a decent TV show getting blown way, way out of proportion to something it never was. It's not even in my top 25, yet TV Guide names it the best show of all time... make me gag!
9) KIDS IN THE HALL: The ultimate, pseudo-intellectual, pretentious English major variety show. That's about the only folks who seem to love Kids in the Hall. I saw it as an inferior version of Conan O'Brien-style humor packed with gay white men constantly wearing drag and performing like 40% of their sketches as transvestites. That wasn't my real problem with the show because I am not homophobic, it just wasn't funny.
.CBW
For a simple definition, a show acclaimed as unique or best of its kind, when really it is (while perhaps well acted) nothing more than derivative of something prior. Rosanne is a show that I'd call overrated in the shadow of All in the Family. Another would be Sex and the City an incredibly overrated show about 4 narcissistic tarts. Anyone claiming this as something new hasn't seen any daytime soaps or nighttime soaps like Dallas (another overrated show.)"Overrated" is such a relative term, that the definition ought to be established before the discussion begins
Judging by some posts in this thread it means a popular show that the poster either doesn't like or had trouble getting into regardless of the show's actual quality."Overrated" is such a relative term, that the definition ought to be established before the discussion begins
Yes, I can agree with that. Story wise, the show didn't function very differently from many westerns that were on TV at the time. The Sheriff/Marshal (Kirk) the cranky Doctor, the stalwart but out of place deputy (Spock). The science fiction wasn't all that ground breaking in relation to shows like Outer Limits or Twilight Zone for exploring the unknown. TNG forward were just grander versions of the original.Judging by some posts in this thread it means a popular show that the poster either doesn't like or had trouble getting into regardless of the show's actual quality."Overrated" is such a relative term, that the definition ought to be established before the discussion begins
I still think that Star Trek is far and away the most overrated show of all time. It's a good show, but not deserving of all this.
Judging by some posts in this thread it means a popular show that the poster either doesn't like or had trouble getting into regardless of the show's actual quality."Overrated" is such a relative term, that the definition ought to be established before the discussion begins
No, that would be a list of shows that are highly rated that the poster doesn't like, being overrated is something different. For an example of an overrated show I'd cite The Wire. It's a brilliant show, it's in my top 5 of TV drama and I would heartily recommend that everyone should watch it, but the amount of praise that it gets makes it seem like David Simon is the second coming of Jesus when he's not. It's just a damn good TV show.Which is a perfectly valid definition if the detractor doesn't see the quality the fan sees. Hence, the detractor is saying the fan "overrates" the quality of what's being presented. There doesn't have a to be an objective definition because the whole concept is subjective.
No, that would be a list of shows that are highly rated that the poster doesn't like, being overrated is something different. For an example of an overrated show I'd cite The Wire. It's a brilliant show, it's in my top 5 of TV drama and I would heartily recommend that everyone should watch it, but the amount of praise that it gets makes it seem like David Simon is the second coming of Jesus when he's not. It's just a damn good TV show.Which is a perfectly valid definition if the detractor doesn't see the quality the fan sees. Hence, the detractor is saying the fan "overrates" the quality of what's being presented. There doesn't have a to be an objective definition because the whole concept is subjective.
Conversely, I don't like Mad Men. I tried to watch it but it just wasn't a show I could get into. I don't think it's overrated, I can see why many people consider it to be the finest drama on TV and they may well be right, but it just wasn't to my taste.
Lost - I was unaware that anyone was actually watching this after season 2, but then come the final season suddenly everyone thinks it's the greatest and smartest show in history.
The supposed "quality" is really the technique of making the show progress so slowly and deliberately that you need the patience of Job to sit through a whole episode.
I consider that to be a legitimate criticism of the show as being overrated while not necessarily agreeing with it.You don't think Mad Men is overrated. I do, by critics and fans alike. It's just a soap opera about an ad exec in the sixties gettin' some on the side.
This, I don't. I haven't watched enough of Mad Men to make that kind of judgement on it, but I know that The Wire is often criticised for the same thing; slow progress, nothing really happens in a given episode. But that's because The Wire is structured differently from most TV shows, it is supposed to be a visual novel with the episodes representing chapters and not complete stories by themselves. It is rare for there to be a big pay-off or climax at the end of each episode, the climax comes at the end of the season and it sometimes takes up multiple episodes rather than 5-10 minutes at the end of a regular show. It is a perfectly legitimate way of telling a story that I find much more rewarding than more traditional TV. The technique is not to your taste? Fair enough. But that doesn't mean that Mad Men is overrated because of it, it just means that you don't like part of what makes the show so highly rated in the first place.The supposed "quality" is really the technique of making the show progress so slowly and deliberately that you need the patience of Job to sit through a whole episode.
Lost - I was unaware that anyone was actually watching this after season 2, but then come the final season suddenly everyone thinks it's the greatest and smartest show in history.
Actually we all thought that by season 1 not 6 and about 15 million in the U.S alone were watching it regulary after season 2 so I don't know how you were unaware of people viewing it.
The Wire is often criticised for the same thing; slow progress, nothing really happens in a given episode. But that's because The Wire is structured differently from most TV shows, it is supposed to be a visual novel with the episodes representing chapters and not complete stories by themselves. It is rare for there to be a big pay-off or climax at the end of each episode, the climax comes at the end of the season and it sometimes takes up multiple episodes rather than 5-10 minutes at the end of a regular show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.