• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Stealing Trek Literature

Scott Pearson

Writer
Captain
Let me say :censored: and :censored: as well as :censored:. I stumbled across a website yesterday that had a link for downloading a pirated copy of Myriad Universes: Shattered Light.

Seven people--on that site, the screen names sathinks, max101cc, Brega10, danijeronimo, quantummagma, sithlady, and TuskinRaider--had helped themselves to this stolen book, and sithlady commented to the poster "You keep providing ST novel goodness. Appreciated!"

Well, sithlady, if you really appreciate ST novel goodness, I would recommend you don't steal them, but support the writers by buying the books, generating royalties and sales that will encourage the writers and the publisher to do more. If you can't afford to buy the book, use a library. Recommend to your library that they carry more Star Trek books. That would be good. As opposed to the bad that you are currently doing.

To the original poster (who used a screen name that has also been used on TrekBBS; since there's no way of knowing if it's the same person I will refrain from using it here): I'm sure you've come up with some sort of tired rationalization to convince yourself that what you're doing isn't wrong, but every single writer of every single book you're uploading would tell you otherwise. If you truly like Star Trek and Star Trek books, then at least out of respect for the writers you should stop uploading them.

If any of the people who use such sites (you know who you are) are reading this post, make no mistake: you are doing wrong by us writers. You can rant about corporations that make too much money or overly restrictive DRMs or whatever . . . but in the end the people who write the books put a lot of time and effort and, yes, I'll say it, love into creating these stories. And just like anyone who creates something--be it a painting, a cabinet, or a song--we should be able to sell that creation if we choose, which helps finance the time we need for whatever art we are able to create. When you take that away from us by downloading pirated copies, you are stealing from us as surely as if you entered our houses and took something off a shelf. Just because movie and music and book distribution has now lost the necessity of being tied to a physical object, it doesn't change the fact that if you take a copy of something for free that's supposed to be for sale, you are shoplifting.

And to you I say :censored: and :censored: as well as :censored:.
 
Well said Scott. I am currently reading my legitimately purchased hard copy of Shattered Light and I am looking forward to reading your story :)
 
Scott, maybe you should point out the hypocrisy you commented on in your Facebook post on this subject: that this site that pirates copyrighted literature contains a copyright notice for its own software. So they assert their own right to protect intellectual property even as they deliberately violate others' right to do the same. So they can't even claim the excuse of not knowing any better.
 
I am not advocating piracy here, but the bit about libraries got me thinking: How is one person buying an ebook and a few people downloading copies any different from one library buying a copy of a book and dozens reading it? Do libraries pay more or something?
 
Don't know about the US (or Germany for that matter), but I think at least in the UK authors get "royalties" for books loaned from (public?) libraries.
 
Well, for one thing, library books are only borrowed by one person at a time. Anyone who borrows a book from a library and then decides they want to have a permanent copy of their very own still has to pay for one. Pirated copies of something can be kept indefinitely by any number of people. So a library isn't a good analogy for that.
 
Don't know about the US (or Germany for that matter), but I think at least in the UK authors get "royalties" for books loaned from (public?) libraries.

That's good to hear. I'm in the UK and I've rented a few Trek books from my library:techman:.
 
Well said Scott. I am currently reading my legitimately purchased hard copy of Shattered Light and I am looking forward to reading your story :)

Hope you like it! :techman:

Scott, maybe you should point out the hypocrisy you commented on in your Facebook post on this subject: that this site that pirates copyrighted literature contains a copyright notice for its own software. So they assert their own right to protect intellectual property even as they deliberately violate others' right to do the same. So they can't even claim the excuse of not knowing any better.

Oh, yeah, forgot that part. The jackweeds who run the site linking to these things, who attempt to absolve themselves by declaring it's solely the original poster's responsibility to do so legally, have the unmitigated gall to run a copyright notice for their site and logo at the bottom of each and every page. They also make a point of saying they don't host the files. Then pretend that they don't know they're facilitating illegal trading of copyrighted material. :mad:
 
In the USA, authors don't get a royalty for library loans, but we do get royalties for any sales to libraries. FYI: Publishers like library sales because they're non-returnable. Which helps authors because every little bit helps convince the publisher to keep, you know, putting out STAR TREK books or whatever.

Remember: the library had to pay for the book, so it's not like it was given away for free. Somehow I doubt these pirate sites paid anyone for the right to distribute the book on-line.
 
Don't know about the US (or Germany for that matter), but I think at least in the UK authors get "royalties" for books loaned from (public?) libraries.

That's good to hear. I'm in the UK and I've rented a few Trek books from my library:techman:.

I read about it on one of the author's blogs (James Swallow?).

I just googled a bit and it seems as if you have to register to receive something (and there seem to be similar systems in other countries).

http://www.plr.uk.com/
 
I just googled a bit and it seems as if you have to register to receive something (and there seem to be similar systems in other countries).

Yep, my friend and author, Libby Gleeson, led the committee that lobbied to have a Public Lending Rights Scheme established in Australia. Not only does it send a small, annual royalty check/cheque to registered writers, the scheme also gives authors an idea as to how well their books' backlist is represented in public libraries, and how often they are circulated. The more the books are circulated, the more they earn - and each borrowing of an older title is a potential new customer who'll buy their next book hot off a bookshop's "new release" shelf.

Another friend, who writes mathematics text books (and was very worried what e-text books might mean for the future of his industry), was surprised at the unexpectedly hefty check he received from the scheme.
 
Let me say :censored: and :censored: as well as :censored:.
Right there with you, Scott, though I would not censor myself. And yes, people often rationalize that they are not stealing intellectual property, effectively declaring that such things are not real property. As you and I both know, they damned well are.

Anyway, have you contacted anybody at Simon & Schuster about this? They will take immediate action.
 
people often rationalize that they are not stealing intellectual property, effectively declaring that such things are not real property.

I have this discussion almost daily with teachers as they (attempt to) use the school library photocopier to make themselves a slab of more than 10% of a work.

Over the years, I've seen people attempt to make a reduced b/w copy of a whole children's picture book - are they really going to be satisfied with such a poor quality item, or wouldn't they rather buy/borrow a real copy of the book - and let the students experience the book the way it's supposed to be experienced? And how do they expect the author to eat, and to feed his or her family, if everyone did what they were doing?

Sometimes my words hit home. It helps that I've written a few manuscripts, have been an editor, and have made some $$$ from educational articles, but they'll usually argue that writing articles is not my only way of making money. As if that somehow absolves them of their crimes.

The need to share the latest "Star Trek" books as free e-novels, as early as possible, and with the whole world is just bizarre. But then, I don't undertand the need to share free pirated versions of the latest movies, as early as possible, and with the whole world, either.

I just borrowed a book from a friend. For free. Basically I am hurting the book sales right now.

But if you really, really love it, you might go and buy your own copy, or your friend might decide they can't live without it while it's gone and they'll buy a new copy. Or you return it dog-eared and they go and get a replacement (I've replaced several friend-worn books - and very rarely lend my stuff any more.)

Your friend is not lending his book permanently to thousands of people at once, which is what those torrents sites are effectively permitting.
 
^ A more precise analogy would be if JarodRussell had a magical free replicator and was printing a thousand copies of the book and giving them away to strangers.

Just as printing counterfeit money devalues real currency, allowing others to create illegal copies of a copyrighted work devalues the property — making it harder for those who produce it to remain employed, and increasing the likelihood that such works will simply cease being published.
 
Anyway, have you contacted anybody at Simon & Schuster about this? They will take immediate action.

I have both emailed Julia and filled out the form on the S&S website.

I just borrowed a book from a friend. For free. Basically I am hurting the book sales right now.

Well, ANYONE who doesn't buy the book is hurting sales, whether they want to read it or not. ;)

Lending is normal social interaction and can spread the word in ways that might not happen otherwise. You could just have easily gotten it from a library. Writers have no problem with that. At the end of the day, essentially, one license was sold for the book and there's still just one book. In other words, what Therin and Mack said.
 
I have little patience for giant corporations that are upset at missing another few dollars from a film or album that's made millions of dollars. "I can't even put fuel in my jet plane!," like they said on South Park. I'm sorry, but I just do not care if I'm stealing money from Jeffrey Katzenberg's pocket.

But, by the same token, I have a lot of sympathy for the authors of TrekLit, most of whom are middle class Americans who genuinely need the money they earn from their novels to make a living.

I understand why people pirate movies, but I can't imagine why anyone would think the publishing industry and its authors can withstand that kind of piracy.
 
Well that just plain sucks. I don't care what people think they're 'entitled' to, piracy is just plain stealing.

It's a pity the people the original post is aimed at probably won't give a damn, and will just go on thinking they're entitled to keep stealing other peoples' work.
 
I don't support piracy in any way, shape or form. However, I do get annoyed at a publishing company that charges Canadians 20% for a book. The US and Canadian dollars have been near par for a number of years now. 20% is robbery.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top